|
I would definitely disable the timer upon entry to the method!
Assuming you are not storing the sensor details every second.
Once you have done the processing store the results in the database, associated tables with foreign key relationships are a basic operation.
Store the primary record
Get the ID from the just inserted record
insert the related records with the primary key.
wrap the entire operation in a transaction and/or use a stored procedure
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't use a System.Timer because the timer events are the lowest priority events in Windows, so a busy system will ignore/skip events in favor of more important work. I think a thread for each sensor to accept/store new data in the database would be a better solution.
As far as visualizing the data, I would either make the user request new data (with a button click), or set up another thread that reads the new data at a regular interval. The length of the interval would be entirely dependent on the level of performance of your hardware and network (if your database is on a separate machine).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I would have thought that 40+ threads on a single machine would have been an issue.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
really depends on the machine i think. On a reasonably powerful machine with a quad core cpu (or better) and at least 16gb of ram, it should be okay. You can always set the CPU affinity for each thread if you need to.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, very basic to you guys but I'm hoping someone can offer some advice.
I'm making a parking lot windows forms project and have a class structure of:
Vehicle
Car:Vehicle
Van:Vehicle
etc.
Then a ParkingLot class which declares a private Dictionary collection of type <string, vehicle=""> to store all the instances. The key is a parking space code e.g. A1, A2, B1, B2 etc, which then returns the vehicle object associated with that slot in the parking lot.
I've made the dictionary private so that all of the functionality is contained in the parkinglot class and the form button presses etc only update the dictionary via public methods in that class for abstraction/separation of concerns (if that's the correct terminology!). The contents of the dictionary are currently displayed in a textbox by calling a parkinglot.displayinventory method which loops through the dictionary items and uses a stringbuilder to create and return the details of all the items to display in the textbox.
All was fine, however, now I want to change it to display the contents in a listbox rather than a text box and now I'm questioning whether using a dictionary object was a good idea (I was thinking of the efficiency of retrieval O(1) of dictionary vs O(n) of list and all that).
Should I just use a public List<vehicle> which I can then bind to the listbox? But then I thought from an abstraction point of view, having the list of items accessible from the form/view was a bad thing?? Should I stick with a private dictionary for efficient retrieval and create and return a readonlycollection object from the displayinventory method for binding (or something similar)?
It's been a while since I've worked with collections and classes and things like this and I've confused myself no end with something so simple! Any tips much appreciated 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I see no fundamental difference between displaying vehicular text in a TextBox and the same in a ListBox.
You never have to use binding, but you can.
Without using any binding, you can iterate your Dictionary and build a string for each Vehicle (I'd say your Vehicle.ToString method should serve that purpose), then add that string to the ListBox.Items
Or indeed you can set up a List of Vehicles and use binding; I know I wouldn't, as I don't like creating a second collection with all the risks of getting out of sync... You could consider using Dictionary.Values as the list of items to be displayed; depends on how you handle empty spots I guess.
PS: the one advantage of using a ListBox, if your app would need that, is that you can actually paint some graphics in a ListBox item (an icon, a picture, whatever); a ListBox collects objects, they don't have to be strings! It would require you to add the actual Vehicles to the ListBox.Items, your ListBox to be set to UserDrawn mode, and you to implement a DrawItem handler.
PS2: can you store a couple of bikes in one spot?
modified 4-Apr-20 18:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Luc. Yes, I could just iterate through the dictionary and populate the listbox but my concern is that I would be exposing the 'master' collection to the form. From an abstraction point of view I was trying to avoid this and only allowing a method (parkinglot.displayitems) to output the contents of the dictionary in a read only form (currently a string that is formatted ready to just display in the textbox)... this is where I've now got confused! Do I just return a copy of the dictionary from this method or some other collection (which I can then iterate through or bind to), or do I just expose the master dictionary object? I'm trying to follow/show good design practices with this project :-/
|
|
|
|
|
When you return a collection of objects basically it is an array of pointers. Making the collection read-only protects the array, not its elements (the objects it refers to). So whatever you do, as long as you export instances of Vehicle, they become public and modifiable.
There are two ways to remedy this:
1. Create and export a deep copy: build a new collection with copies of your Vehicles. Now if Vehicle contains references (say to a Manufacturer class), then these objects must be deep copied too. That soon gets very cumbersome.
2. Create and export exactly the information you need, in a data structure that isn't otherwise used in your ParkingLot class. In this case that would be a list of strings. And then you should create this data each time it is requested, you should not store it inside ParkingLot and just pass a pointer, as then one client could still falsify the information another client gets.
Either way, the clean approach is to provide a ParkingLot property or method that creates and returns the information required; and then you can use that any way you want, no harm can be done to the ParkingLot.
The one thing you probably would also need is a way to signal the outside world your ParkingLot has changed. An event seems appropriate here.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, yes, of course they are. Completely forgot it just stores pointers to the objects. Thanks for pointing that out!!
As I said, it's been a while! Thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I would use a List<vehicle> and binding, but then I use WPF not winforms. I find List<> to much more maintainable and manageable.
I would also not allow database/binding or list/dictionary efficiency to influence my decision with such a small number if items.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Performance is not an issue, even with thousands of dictionary entries.
Your "parking lot" class is in effect your "data repository", and you can use a similar pattern for that. Ultimately, your "backing store" may be be XML or a data base; if a "client" needs a "list", they get a list; if they want to "empty" a parking spot, there's a method for that, etc. The client doesn't care what the backing store looks like, it just wants what it needs.
And as Luc pointed out, it's all references to existing objects unless you're cloning.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
modified 5-Apr-20 17:11pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest you model a "parking lot business:"
PLotBusiness
Finances ?
PLotData : map vehicles to locations, status, etc.
VehicleManager
Cars
Vans
PLotManager
SpacesI would use methods in these classes that returned collections, or datatables, for binding to Controls as necessary.
imho, the separation of concerns in this model is desirable. "Let the atoms remain ignorant of how they are used in molecules," I once said 
for UI design, think about the end-user: their technical depth, their role, their needs, security ...
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Expose a Cars property:
public IEnumerable<Vehicle> Cars { get { return _dictionary.Values; } }
(This assumes:
private Dictionary<string, Vehicle> _dictionary; )
Bind parkingLot.Cars to your listbox.
Make sure Vehicle has a ToString() which renders it as you want it to appear in the listbox.
Truth,
James
|
|
|
|
|
Hello friends. I have a big problem..
Know about C# FlowLayoutPanel Controls how to filter sql query use? 
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a good question - we cannot work out from that little what you are trying to do.
Remember that we can't see your screen, access your HDD, or read your mind - we only get exactly what you type to work with.
So typing as little as possible help no-one - we don't even know what kind of app you are writing, so we can't give you any specific information!
Try again, this time explaining as if to someone who knows absolutely nothing about your project and is at the other end of a telephone.
Tell us what you have tried, where you are stuck, what help you need - and be specific!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
FlowLayoutPanel has absolutely nothing to do with filtering records. All it does is affect how contained controls are laid out on the form.
|
|
|
|
|
Unable to see traces and Service in Jaeger UI on host server, used C# client (tracer) for Jaeger but able see traces in local environment using "jaeger-all-in-one --collector.zipkin.http-port=9411"
I have tried below code and Referred link as
https://itnext.io/jaeger-tracing-on-kubernetes-with-asp-net-core-and-traefik-86b1d9fd5489
public static class JaegerTracingServiceCollectionExtensions
{
public static IServiceCollection AddJaegerTracing(
this IServiceCollection services,
Action<jaegertracingoptions> setupAction = null)
{
if (setupAction != null) services.ConfigureJaegerTracing(setupAction);
services.AddSingleton<itracer>(cli =>
{
var options = cli.GetService<ioptions<jaegertracingoptions>>().Value;
var senderConfig = new Jaeger.Configuration.SenderConfiguration(options.LoggerFactory)
.WithAgentHost(options.JaegerAgentHost)
.WithAgentPort(options.JaegerAgentPort);
var reporter = new RemoteReporter.Builder()
.WithLoggerFactory(options.LoggerFactory)
.WithSender(senderConfig.GetSender())
.Build();
var sampler = new GuaranteedThroughputSampler(options.SamplingRate, options.LowerBound);
var tracer = new Tracer.Builder(options.ServiceName)
.WithLoggerFactory(options.LoggerFactory)
.WithReporter(reporter)
.WithSampler(sampler)
.Build();
// Allows code that can't use dependency injection to have access to the tracer.
if (!GlobalTracer.IsRegistered())
GlobalTracer.Register(tracer);
return tracer;
});
services.AddOpenTracing(builder => {
builder.ConfigureAspNetCore(options => {
options.Hosting.IgnorePatterns.Add(x => {
return x.Request.Path == "/health";
});
options.Hosting.IgnorePatterns.Add(x => {
return x.Request.Path == "/metrics";
});
});
});
return services;
}
public static void ConfigureJaegerTracing(
this IServiceCollection services,
Action<jaegertracingoptions> setupAction)
{
services.Configure<jaegertracingoptions>(setupAction);
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
So what exactly is your question?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
I am beginner in C# and I am building an application to create a workbook (Book1.xlsx) then copy a specific sheet from another workbook ( Book2.xlsx ).
I created Book1 but I am trying to copy Sheet1 from Book2 but I could not.
before copying [Sheet1 from Book2 ] I am dong a kind of check to collect names for all opened workbooks so I could not be able to get names of workbooks which opened by Visual Studio c# by the below piece of code but If will open the same workbooks by myself I found the below code can get the name of opened workbooks without problem.
I don't know why.
public void CopyAsiRefSheet()
{
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application XAPP;
XAPP = (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application)System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.GetActiveObject("Excel.Application");
foreach (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Workbook WB in XAPP.Workbooks)
{
MessageBox.Show(WB.Name);
}
}
Thanks,
Moelsayed
|
|
|
|
|
|
I`m working on a graphics editor. I was trying to implement a gui in DirectX but I realised that`s not the right approach. I`m used to C# Forms so I was asking myself if I can stitch C# GUI (Forms) and C++ DirectX together. Any help is welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
WinForms is also not the right approach. Use WPF instead.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Could you expand? I would like to use my existing C++ code base would that be possible?
|
|
|
|
|
That's impossible to answer since you are the only one who knows how that code is written and what it depends on.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
