|
Kind of mandatory[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Google announced today that you’ll be able to register a .new domain for an online shortcut of your own. blurb.new
I can hardly wait for it to be weaponized. Probably in a day or two.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Probably in a day or two.
I didn't realize you were that optimist... I would have tipped for one or two hours.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
google canada will be allowing .canoe shortcuts. Best for streaming websites 
|
|
|
|
|
Short answer: probably not. Its popularity may have more to do with the “bigger minimalism trend” than usability, says one expert. "Blackness, blackness draggin' me down"
|
|
|
|
|
You should have connected better with previous posts...
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Blackness, blackness draggin' me down"
Better: Don't let you be attracted to the dark side, my young padawan...   
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment below:
Not only is Martin Gunsberg's term of "telltale" not a word used in the SYNC3 documentation at all, the functionality he described isn't explained in the owner's manual either. Even if every single car renter reviewed the manual, it is not clear they would understand what icon to look for or would recognize what it is supposed to indicate if they did see it. 
Companies really don't give a crap if it there is no $$$-threat
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A group of Russian scientists was hit by crippling roaming charges after some of the eagles the researchers were studying flew to countries with high roaming charges, including Iran, Turkmenistan, and Pakistan. The birds were outfitted with electronic devices that tracked their locations and sent back status updates a few times a day. Always check roaming charges before migrating
|
|
|
|
|
How was it...
expect the best, be prepared for the worst?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It still appears to be a poorly-designed experiment. Assuming the data roaming charges are per MB or part of it, what is wrong with aggregating data and sending it off as a burst?
Even if they track the position of the eagle on a minute-by-minute basis, that would be no more than 1440 data points per day, which would easily fit into a data burst of less than 1MB. Surely a daily update would have been timely enough for their needs.
EDIT: from the description, they must have used SMS to send the messages. So they buffered the messages when out of contact, then sent them one by one using the most inefficient protocol available.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: EDIT: from the description, they must have used SMS to send the messages. So they buffered the messages when out of contact, then sent them one by one using the most inefficient protocol available.
Yes, they used SMS. In the article I read was explained with some more details (German paper)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: So they buffered the messages when out of contact, then sent them one by one using the most inefficient protocol available.
For devices powered by a coin cell or fingernail sized solar panel power efficiency matters. SMS can be sent while conducting handshakes with cell towers at a tiny fraction of the power usage of switching to (any) datamode. This is especially important as 2/3g networks are shut down because standard LTE modems have much higher power consumption levels.
A few years back I read an article on Anandtech about companies working in this type of hardware developing much lower power alternatives; IIRC unidirectional LTE (vs simultaneous TX/RX modules) @ 0.9 MHz channel widths (vs 5+5 MHz as the normal minimum), and a 'super 2g' standard with 20kHz channels. Both were intended to operate in either scraps of phone spectrum too narrow for modern usage (eg the US 800MHz band has 2.5, 1.5, and 1.0 MHz slivers) or in a few small slices of spectrum used for industrial embedded communications long before IOT was a buzzword.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I stand corrected. I didn't consider the power requirements.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
And now you also know why eagles didn't just take Frodo and Sam to Mount Doom
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Happened to European researchers before, too: their ducks flew from central Europe to Russia and Kazakhstan...
Well, birds enjoy traveling through the world, and they need not worry about visa regulations, airline policies, roaming fees, ...
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
 What a great example of the side-effects of technology!
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: What a great example of the side-effects of technology bad planning!
FTFY
They could have chosen another price listing (international fee or whatever is called) and this would not have happened. Maybe a bit more expensive at the beginning, but definitively cheaper than this issue. 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Kroah-Hartman, the stable Linux kernel maintainer, says we're going to see Intel chip security problems for years to come. This 'know-nothing blurb writer' agrees
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Greg Kroah-Hartman, the stable Linux kernel maintainer, says we're going to see Intel chip security problems for years to come.
If M$ continues making things worst and forces more people to move to Linux... we are going to see Linux security problems for years to come too
In my land there is an expression that (freely translated) says:
People complain about a broken thread in others suit, but don't see the big hole in their own clothes.
EDIT:
Nathan is right.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 29-Oct-19 8:19am.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think this has as much to do with OS as it does with the fact that chip makers have exhausted Moore's Law and have been looking for alternatives design approaches. A lot of these alternative approaches are exploitable. This isn't a linux vs windows thing, just as Spectre and Meltdown were platform agnostic.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Minier wrote: This isn't a linux vs windows thing, just as Spectre and Meltdown were platform agnostic.
Fair enough
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And how is it doing?
I have always heard that AMD are worse than intel due to easy overheating, what drops the performance when a limit is reached...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
) but because we are running AMD chips --