|
Wow, that gives me pause to think, but not furlong.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
That's a bit of a stretch
“The palest ink is better than the best memory.” - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
That's the height of speculation; imagine, ostrich the limits of you viewpoint to see if it stilt a actual mystery.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
We let it all hang out.
Technician
1. A person that fixes stuff you can't.
2. One who does precision guesswork based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Typical; the subject is the height, but you discuss the length. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have reached 319,913 points at 14:41 (UTC+2Hrs).
Is this a sign? Do i have a chance to win on lottery or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: Do i have a chance to win on lottery or something?
Yes, but not because of your "sign". 
>> Is this a sign?
Well, some would say that an angel is trying to ping you so to speak, since they can't communicate with us on the earthly plain directly, so they try to send messages with weird everyday occurrences, usually in odd or extraordinary number sequences like time: 11:11, etc.
I personally do not believe they communicate with us via clocks, but some do. To each their own.
|
|
|
|
|
It can't be a coincidence! 
Personally, i don't believe in Numerology, but... i'll take a risk and try Polish Lotto and Eurojackpot. As you said, not because of "sign", but to give a chance to win.
Have a nice day!
Maciej
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in the off chance you strike it rich, be sure to throw a nickel or two my way.
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: i don't believe in Numerology
Me neither. Numbers are not real. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: Is this a sign? Do i have a chance to win on lottery or something?
I'd back "something" as more likely.
Meanwhile back in the real world every lottery ticket has 50% odds: it will either be the winner, or it wont.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Something is more than nothing 
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it's a sign of anything, it's that you're probably reading too much into it...
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: have reached 319,913 points at 14:41 (UTC+2Hrs).
Is this a sign? Do i have a chance to win on lottery or something?
I don't know... did you win the lottery when you had 318,813 points?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can numbers be considered a palindrome also?
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: Do i have a chance to win on lottery
After I down-vote your QA answers until your rep is #666, then Satan will be in touch.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all your down-votes, Bill.
I hope that satan-signed-reputation will help me winning on lottery.
|
|
|
|
|
Since Satan has made me the lottery, I guarantee you'll win.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
So when you regex capture, you can specify capture groups like
(<identifier>?[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*)
what i can do with that is take those capture groups and make JSON fields out of them.
So then basically you can define a JSON object using a series of capture groups in regex, which you run over some text to scrape it.
Finally, you can take that and use it to create a web scraper that presents a facade of JSON objects based on regex scrape expressions.
Anyone seen anything like this already? And is it stupid? it's very simple, so i don't know. that can be good or bad.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Anyone seen anything like this already?
Yes, I have seen and used Regex before... not sure what else you are suggesting you may have discovered here?
Also, JSON is just a string (it's basically a serialisation format). There are no fields or objects, perhaps you mean javascript objects?
|
|
|
|
|
conceptually a JSON object is
{
<fieldname>: <value>,
<fieldname>: <value>,
<fieldname>: <value>
}
A JSON array is
[
<element>,
<element>,
<element>
]
So now when I say these things you can know what I mean.
Now, furthermore when people use JSON they don't use it as a raw string, but normalized data.
My JSON engine, like every single one in existence, normalizes JSON into queryable objects.
For example, a JSON object (see above) may become an instance of a class implementing IDictionary<string, object>. (Json: A Fairly Powerful JSON Engine in a Small Package[^])
I'm sorry, I figured most people would know what I meant already.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
