|
Very well-said. cheers, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
My old company had a no a**holes policy. They were burned one time too many by smart-ish jerks whose ability to stop a project with pointless squabbling, and rudeness out weighed their ability to complete a project.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Seem a bit contradictory ?
Not at all. Confidence is important to communicate with trust, specially if we have multidisciplinary engagements and sometimes, with clients. Confidence is very important to firmly show a point so its absorbed by the audience. Whereas overconfidence is very dangerous and can easily blind the overconfident from the truth (and blind others too) and can also quickly lead to arrogance. When someone is overconfident re-validation of his beliefs do not happen as frequently as they should.
BillWoodruff wrote: ... how much does personality come into play ...
A lot! I for one have experienced a fair share of behavior that can intoxicate a whole team. You mentioned extreme behavior, but the extreme behavior in many ways are silent. Someone that is overconfident may shadow an entire team and enforce the rule of "my way or the highway". I have seem plenty of this happening to teams I participated in and also the ones I had contact with. Some types of behavior can can hinder innovation, demotivate peers and simply steer the team in the wrong direction as if it was right.
Teaching skills is much cheaper and faster than changing someone's behavior and also carries a lot less risk to the company. All we need is someone eager to learn and with the right cultural fit in the company and the team.
BillWoodruff wrote: I hate that inevitable question about: "the time when you made a mistake ..." !
It is a great question! It can tell a lot about the candidate's ability to admit he makes mistakes and how he deals with it. Hiding a mistake can be very costly and have worse consequences than the mistake itself. Learning how the candidate deals with mistakes can tell a lot about his arrogance or humbleness, his ability to react to negative situations, teamwork, ability to learn and adapt. This question alone can help raise lots of flags about the candidate.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
Confidence? Does that include the confidence to let the interviewer know that you don't want to work with him/her?
The most recent interview that I deliberately "flubbed" was with RIM a few years back (shortly before they went bankrupt). I had pretty much decided I did not want to work with the folks that were interviewing me (I thought their interview technique was essentially useless, and they appeared to be having problems with employee retention), when they asked, "How good are you at multi-tasking?"
My reply: "I suck at it, and so do you, especially if you think you don't." That little truth-bomb was pretty much the end of the interview.
|
|
|
|
|
celticfiddler wrote: Confidence? Does that include the confidence to let the interviewer know that you don't want to work with him/her?
I guess. The moment that you feel you don't want to work with them, you can end the interview right there (you don't need to be impolite) so you stop wasting both people's times.
celticfiddler wrote: That little truth-bomb was pretty much the end of the interview.
Although I can understand the motivation for having a little bit of fun before ending the interview, I wouldn't do it myself. That's a little bit of my life experience that what goes around comes around.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
The Dunning-Kruger effect is not about "confidence" as that word is commonly used [^].
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
It seems similar to the effect when people believe their own lies.
To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia
|
|
|
|
|
It works both ways, I have interviewed with very inexperienced interviewers who were so nervous that as a young man I was unequipped to deal with that. In that instance, neither has a strong enough personality to make the interview work.
In other situations I interviewed with an interviewer who had a really strong personality. It felt like an interrogation, I came out shaking, though I did get the job. It turns out he was doing that on purpose and he was impressed that I did not break down during the interview.
In another case I was interviewed by someone who was roughly my equal though he was more mature. The interviews went well, I got the job.
So, yes, personality matters, it always will. At least until Robots and AI's are doing the hiring, then it will be one sided, until the applicants are robots and AI's.
|
|
|
|
|
The very best programmers I have ever worked with were mildly to severely introverted, and mildly to moderately (high-functioning) autistic.
When I started my career as a programmer, I was very slightly introverted, and more than just slightly autistic. As my career progressed, I became more introverted, and less autistic (I think the latter was mostly due to dietary changes).
Since I am personally familiar with introversion and autism, if I was interviewing a programmer for a position at my company, I would look for signs of both of those.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakeshare wrote: Nobody wants to work with a dick who's an expert at (e.g.) C++ and is obnoxiously right most of the time.
Glad to see you have an active fantasy life 
jakeshare wrote: Hard skills training is a lot easier than soft skills training
I can see why you're a recruiter.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a recruiter. I teach people how to find jobs.
---
Job Search Expert
JobMob
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations on not being a recruiter !
I read your article up until I read:Quote: Why are soft skills important?
A 1918 study – yes, over 100 years ago – by Harvard University, the Carnegie Foundation and Stanford Research Center, found that “85% of a person’s job success is a product of interpersonal (soft) skills and that only 15% of his success is the result of technical knowledge (hard skills).”
Does that still hold up today? It certainly feels right, give or take.
What is true is that many recruiters prefer candidates having all the desired soft skills while missing some of the required hard skills rather than vice-versa. Hard skills training is a lot easier than soft skills training.
At which point I threw up 
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley you mean "Last 0.3048 meterage of Kilometres Davis".
Get hip with the times, Baby!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I stand corrected.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone using VS2019? I saw that absurd modal Stary Window and thought "WTF ????"
Is there any way to turn that off? I use the VS2017 Start Page all the time. is that gone now?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
You can turn it off, but you can't get the old start page back without installing an extension - eg:
Start Page on startup - Visual Studio Marketplace[^]
Almost every request to bring back the old non-modal page seems to be closed - for example:
Start Page: Please give it back! - Developer Community[^]
This one has a comment from July suggesting they're looking to make the start window non-modal:
Make the Visual Studio 2019 start window non-modal - Developer Community[^]
Quote: Quick update - we're looking into hosting the UI of the start window within a document tab or tool window within the IDE as an option. So you can launch Visual Studio with the focused UI of the start window to get to your code initially, but if you are already within the IDE, then the same UI will show up in a non-modal way.
- Pratik Nadagouda [MSFT] Jul 11 at 10:35 PM
There hasn't been an update since then, but the ticket is still "under review".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Marvelous.. Every time I see some new "feature" like this, I wonder what moron at MS decided this was a good idea
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the same guy that thought it was important to make VS2019 more easily themeable.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect it may be a whole team of morons...
My plan is to live forever ... so far so good
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I wonder what moron at MS decided this was a good idea
This might be a trigger for some, but MS seems to put the lesser lights in charge (probably to reduce labor costs) of projects, which eliminates to wiser, more experienced minds that used to manage products and projects and lead software development.
My lead example of this is that 30 years ago, we had a WinForms designer in the VB IDE that worked beautifully. And so it did going forward through the advent of .NET and Visual Studio. Yet today's "brain trust" at MS says it is too hard to make a XAML designer work as well as the WinForms designer that was once written in assembler!
Maybe MS needs to hire adults and not wannabes to lead their product development and software development.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Every time I see some new "feature" like this, I wonder what moron at MS decided this was a good idea
The one that decided that since they had some spare developer cycles, they should fix something that wasn't broke, instead of something that was.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. That first option did it for me
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
