|
This is the side effect of "You must use enums for comparisons so that the code is maintainable." code review comments.
|
|
|
|
|
I hate this kind of dogmatic crap.
What the hell is wrong with a define, in upper case for comparisons?
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy. Unless you're doing it wrong, in which case it's challenging.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow...
and with a slogan of "Take your skills to the next level" I'm just wondering what level they speak of?
Technician
1. A person that fixes stuff you can't.
2. One who does precision guesswork based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I think they're talking about level 4 (by Dante's reckoning).
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMG, code in the Lounge, will the un go dark next?
Isn't Ord(MyEnumVar) easier?
|
|
|
|
|
In August I will be in London / Bath / Cardiff and I'm trying to book a date for A Midsummer Night's Dream.
Well, they have a site that seem made in the early 2000s, with a non functional payment section (maybe it works only for the UK Maestro cards because with my Mastercard it simply shows a blank space after I click on pay).
Truied with all the browsers on different days, nada. No PayPal option. Send an e-mail to support: they booked the seats for me (I told them the seats and date in the e-mail) I just have to phone to pay. International phone call, ugh, ok no problem... the number they gave me is inactive, and it's the same advertised on their site. [this was a problem on my side, I had to mangle the number to make the call from abroad]
I'm not sure if I am a (wannabe) spectator of a show or the unwitting actor of a comedy.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
modified 22-Jul-19 10:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
if the sites looks that old perhaps ie 5, or mosaic netscape 3 will work?
(just don't expect any secure/https connections or encryption of your credit card details.)
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm fairly sure it's a validation problem, it has two fields required for UK cards that don't exist for other cards.
Well, phoning in worked, except that I had to ask to slow down because street british accent is "oufol".
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: street british accent is "oufol".
Same as most languages if you are not a native speaker. But chances are the person you were speaking to was not either. Most help lines in Britain these days are manned by foreigners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Judging by the accent he was a local descended from the first conquerors in 1061
So either Danish or French.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck following Shakespeare then 
|
|
|
|
|
Not a big problem, I already followed Richard II in 2013 and I didn't find it excessively difficult. I've been more exposed to Shakespearian english than London street english.
Also the new productions tend to go easy on the ancient english, only the traditional plays maintain it in all its splendour and difficulty.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Well, they have a site that seem made in the early 2000s
It's Shakespeare; late 1500s.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed in the past few years that most advertised C++ jobs are in the Linux ecosystem. Apart from legacy applications what new work is being done specifically in the Microsoft ecosystem?
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Microsoft itself is always looking for C++ developers.
Apart from that - mostly games and low-level system development.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like fun, actually.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
my take is:
- windows is a good presentation platform (massage and show information to 1 person, and with interfaces via web and even say office apps programming is lite if not nearly fully automated),
- windows is not well suited to processing information. (poor file handling capabilities and multi-processing capabilities in particular when you try and do those things together).
Just look at how something pretty simple like chrome, excel even word with large documents can still cripple a windows machine (it demonstrates even a moderate level of basic context switching - not multitasking - is a strain for windows.)
windows' core is still based on simplistic context switching (and rumored even some actual code) written for winxp, which let's face it was written for single user machines using a generation of processors and associated hardware that themselves were never designed / intended / even-in-wildest-dreams-envisioned for full-on multitasking
------------
summary in 1 sentence: windows is a single user presentation platform, not a processing platform.
(and btw: all windows server does is add another layer of [still very basic] context switching and some simplistic semi-'virtualisation' capabilities to the windows code base.)
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
So true for end user boxes.
No so for Server boxes.
Windows Server has a different core.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz wrote: Windows Server has a different core.
LOL
it's a huge amount the same core just with some extra wrapping (and crapping)
as mentioned before - an extra [sort of] layer on the context switching, some built-in sort-of virtualisation, a few extra facets to the security (albeit more at interface/app level rather then kernel), a few (again mostly app-level) extensions to networking and other libraries).
like buying the basic version of a car, or the all-in version with 7 speed auto, cruise control, ABS, larger engine and ... - underneath still came from the same set of blueprints, aka. the same core design.
(binaries of quite a few low level OS apps can be pulled back and forth between desktop & server - if the 'core' of each were very different that would be highly unlikely - just like you can pull the doors of the cheap model of the car and bolt it onto the top end model - same shape, same fitting points.)
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Much of that is true for older server versions, but no so much since Windows 8/Server 2012 timeframe and certainly not so from Windows 10/Server 2016 timeframe.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I assume there are a lot of specialized desktop application (all aspects of engineering for example) that still mostly use C++.
They are not fancy or technically state of the art (it is hard to change due to inertia), but they are out there.
That's what I've been doing for the last 25+ years of work ( I know crap of C# or all those new fangle internet technologies)
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Are you any good with an icon editor?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
