|
|
Does a developer really want to be called a builder? AWS sure wants to use builder especially as it pitches itself as a master tool provider for enterprises. "Time to get busy, such a lot to do: building and fixing till it's good as new"
|
|
|
|
|
But can we fix it?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than a year after patches were released to thwart powerful NSA exploits that leaked online, hundreds of thousands of computers are unpatched and vulnerable. Universal Plug and Prey
|
|
|
|
|
Akamai must be a good company to listen to, on such matters, as this search[^] shows.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
As a new research paper points out, ignoring the value of free products and services also means GDP may be missing a lot of value created in the form of free programming languages Just in the cost of buying new hardware to get better performance
|
|
|
|
|
Good God, what utter nonsense!
Is it "Let's Make Ridiculous Statements and Act Like they're News!" day, or something?
A more interesting version of the article: Hey, Listen! We all pee a couple of times a day, but if we didn't, we'd be less efficient in our work, and that would filter through to have an effect on the GDP of whatever country we're not peeing in!
If the guy has just woken up to how GDP works, he should wait until he understands it a little better, before lecturing on it.
There have always been and will always be free things for writing code, whether they be languages, IDEs, or whatever else. Some became popular, and some didn't, that's all.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
You can go with Kotlin , ELM , Elixr and many more but I suggest you to look into Crystal as it seems more robust and promising Just in case you needed something else to fix all the problems in your life
I mean - ELM, Elixir, and Kotlin. Definitely great company, right? :eyeroll:
I won't try it - I developed a fear of things named "Crystal" in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I won't try it - I developed a fear of things named "Crystal" in the past.
It took me ten minutes to click the reply non-button.
I was like a rabbit fluffy bunny frozen in the headlights.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
wait till one gets to the reports part !!!!
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funny how lots of people's favourite issues of the Avengers were drawn by George Perez.
And Shooter was one of the better writers on the series, too (which says very little for the rest of the series).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That and I'm old and it was part of my childhood.
|
|
|
|
|
Is Silicon Valley a force for good?[^]
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
If you are holding votes on the "good" of a company, you are already lost. A company is there to make money.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course they are, but that's not the point to the article. The question is whether the tech giants provide a net benefit or not. Despite the technoligical advances they provide, there is a cost to be paid. Those costs include censorship, surveilance, loss of personal data and free expression etc.
In my opinion whatever value such tech giants provide, overall they are a net cost rather than a net gain.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: Despite the technoligical advances they provide, there is a cost to be paid. Those costs include censorship, surveilance, loss of personal data and free expression etc.
You forget that "good" is subjective; the things you call costs are considered benefits by many governments. Also, knowing the metric does not change their decision-making.
Dominic Burford wrote: In my opinion whatever value such tech giants provide, overall they are a net cost rather than a net gain.
Any "gaint" corporation is a threat. Once a business is bigger than the smallest country, it has too much power.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: You forget that "good" is subjective; the things you call costs are considered benefits by many governments
I didn't use the word 'good', I said 'costs'. Describing something as good or bad is subjective, whereas describing it's 'cost' is more objective and is more quantifiable.
It should be fairly obvious that I am coming at this from the perspective of a user, not of a government. All the examples in the article relate to people, not governments. And yes, the fact that many of the 'costs' that tech giants provide are net gains for the goverment is also precisely the problem. That should also be obvious.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: I didn't use the word 'good', I said 'costs'.
Topic was referring to good, not to costs. Still, had to upvote it for providing good arguments.
Dominic Burford wrote: It should be fairly obvious that I am coming at this from the perspective of a user, not of a government. All the examples in the article relate to people, not governments. And yes, the fact that many of the 'costs' that tech giants provide are net gains for the goverment is also precisely the problem.
In that case, there's also a military-industrial complex that has a high "cost". As a voting user, I know that we'll get little say in the matter.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: In that case, there's also a military-industrial complex that has a high "cost". As a voting user, I know that we'll get little say in the matter.
That's a good point. As a society we need to balance out whether the costs ultimately justify the means. And that's never going to be easy. And if it's decided that the costs are too high, how do we do about rolling those services back in again?
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
If you keep talking like that, you'll be labelled a communist soon 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure how the conversation managed to stray from Silicon Valley to communism but I think this thread has now come to an end 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: I think this thread has now come to an end
I think one more post 
Dominic Burford wrote: I'm not sure how the conversation managed to stray from Silicon Valley to communism
You want to measure "social costs" and take actions against those deemed "too expensive". That was what you wanted to suggest, no?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
"Despite the technological advances they provide..."
The ones who bring those costs along with them provide zero advances, technological or otherwise. In my opinion anyway.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
