|
The subcontracted workers were challenging their termination, but they couldn’t hold out. “Union, Union, Union City blue”
Technically subcontractors, but no one has heard of Lionbridge, so the headline mentions Microsoft.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft should have just hired some exterminators to get rid of their bedbug and roach problems.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
With Sketch 2 Code, developers can draw wire frame sketches and export them into source code. No, it was supposed to be a monkey, not a database front-end
|
|
|
|
|
So how does the algorithm solve the "magic happens here" portion?
|
|
|
|
|
With a little AI pixie dust, of course. I’m sure it’s 100% effective. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Am I reading it right that it's output is raw html, as opposed to the specific flavor/markup/WT![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) used by <insert buzzword="" compliant="" frontend="" library="" here="">?
If so it seems like it'd be really limited in actual use beyond the simplest of quasi-static or fully static pages.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't they just build the whole app and give it to you ... hey cortana build me a contact form for my website...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
modified 24-Aug-18 14:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Antimatter continues to behave just like regular matter, no matter what tests scientists throw at it. And in the face of yet another new challenge, antimatter has again refused to crack. Probably best not to try to catch it though
|
|
|
|
|
If they keep disturbing the antimatter, they might make it madder.
|
|
|
|
|
Antimatter continues to behave just like regular matter .. so whats the point in dropping it ?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
abmv wrote: so whats the point in dropping it ?
Getting funds for more "studies"?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Antimatter has mostly been manipulated via electromagnetic forces, and indeed behaves like matter in this respect. We have yet to collect enough antimatter in one place to test how it reacts to gravity.
If, for example, it has a positive inertial mass so that it accelerates "normally" but a negative gravitational mass, that is it falls "upwards", we would have to rewrite quite a lot of physics. Don't you think this would be interesting?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: If, for example, it has a positive inertial mass so that it accelerates "normally" but a negative gravitational mass, that is it falls "upwards", we would have to rewrite quite a lot of physics. Don't you think this would be interesting?
Yes.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
abmv wrote: Antimatter continues to behave just like regular matter .. so whats the point in dropping it ?
To see whether it doesn't when dropping it.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
To gain a better understanding of how many code snippets hosted on GitHub's gist system are actually executable, researchers at North Carolina State University conducted a thorough evaluation of the executability of publicly available Python scripts hosted on the platform. Executable, or justification for execution?
|
|
|
|
|
Russian arms maker Kalashnikov on Thursday presented its new electric car inspired by a rare 1970s model, saying the new technology will rival Elon Musk's Tesla. Well, they've certainly brought the S3XY with that model!
|
|
|
|
|
From the article: rare 1970s model
There's a reason it was rare, yuck.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Russian arms maker Kalashnikov
They're building a bullet train?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
A coffee-delivering drone that can detect when people are tired and bring them a drink has been patented by technology company IBM. That's what I hear buzzing over Chris' office?
|
|
|
|
|
Now that's a good idea! Will it make the coffee? Or just a delivery service?
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
IBM? Does Wally work for IBM?
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
This could be useful when they close down and spin IBM into International Coffee Machines ICM
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Why change the name? What could possibly be more important to a business than ensuring that its employees have a steady supply of coffee?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
If the Commons clause were to be adopted by all open source projects, they would cease to be open source, and therefore the Commons clause is trying to destroy open source. Open-ish source?
|
|
|
|
|
Drew wrote: If the Commons clause were to be adopted by all open source projects, they would cease to be open source1, and therefore the Commons clause is trying to destroy open source. When this first appeared I spoke out about it in discussion threads around the net, but didn’t think anyone would take it seriously.
Don't even worry, we don't take the idiotic statement even a tiny bit seriously.
You will never unite all code in a single license type. It is not a real threat, just a way to get attention and selling ads.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
