|
Is this context going to have 2nd and 3rd best articles with prizes like before? Or only the best out of these? 
Looks like it's going to be very close 1st players....
|
|
|
|
|
I Believe only one winner!;P
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even though all articles are very good, the collection builder gives a simple way to produce faster coding. It can be exampandeble very easiely due to it's simplicity.
|
|
|
|
|
orbmoas wrote:
the collection builder gives a simple way to produce faster codi
Agreed!;)
|
|
|
|
|
Good article, however not worthy winning!
|
|
|
|
|
SteveJ23 wrote:
however not worthy winning
We should never say who is and not worth winning....
|
|
|
|
|
Well put this way, I have never imagined in getting this amount of votes, winning or losing I am alreay very happy
Cheers
ES
|
|
|
|
|
Erick Sgarbi wrote:
I have never imagined in getting this amount of votes
|
|
|
|
|
 Hmmm... shame... now that I have an idea for one
Mauricio Ritter - Brazil
Sonorking now: 100.13560 MRitter
English is not my native language so, if you find any spelling erros in my posts, please let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Mauricio Ritter wrote:
now that I have an idea for one
No, it's impossible. Outlook is a perfect product, there is no room for improvement, ever. 
|
|
|
|
|
>>> Outlook is a perfect product, there is no room for improvement
LOL - 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This addin is the strongest and most impactful add-in of all posted add-ins. That's just a shame it was posted that late, and will have hard time catching up others.
Again. Kuddows to the guy. And kuddows to Lutz of course. 
|
|
|
|
|
Reflector catches up. Glad to see there is some logic of truth outta there.
For those who wouldn't know yet, Reflector decompiles the source code from the .NET framework (and in fact all assemblies) into readable C# and VB.NET code. It also lets one find types by name, and a few other ways to quickly browse the class hierarchy. It's the handiest .NET tool to work with, and an unmatched way to make quick progress into the 5000+ classes.
|
|
|
|
|
Stephane Rodriguez. wrote:
Glad to see there is some logic of truth outta there.
There ins't anything new on that addin, nothing build for the coder. The whole Reflector addin is purely the Reflector standalone tool(????)
Stephane Rodriguez. wrote:
It's the handiest .NET tool to work with, and an unmatched way to make quick progress into the 5000+ classes.
what do you mean by that?????
|
|
|
|
|
What is worth in that article is the Managed addins section which is not part of the context of the addin. If the addin was totaly revolving how to build a managed addin then it would get my vote. No architecture No Vote
|
|
|
|
|
The Managed Add-Ins framework *is* the add-in that I'm submiting. Reflector is just one example of an application that can now be quite easily made into an add-in. The whole point is that it is now easy to leverage existing technology even if you don't have the source!
It would have been much easier for me to submit NUnit Add-In [1] that I have been working on for a good number of months. Instead I wrote the Managed Add-Ins framework from scratch within the two months that the competition ran. It can host dynamicaly updatable add-ins (i.e. Whaoo!) as specified in the brief.
If you're thinking that NUnit Add-In hosts the NUnit GUI in the same way that Reflector is hosted you are wrong. It uses the NUnit.Framework assembly in the same way that the NUnit GUI and NUnit Console does. It is a pity that the NUnit GUI couldn't just be hosted in Visual Studio.NET. With the Managed Add-Ins framework is will be very easy to do so!
Run NUnit, JUnit and Ad-Hoc methods within VS.NET
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/nunitaddin
Have fun, Jamie.
P.S. If you're using a build prior to 32, please upgrade. The add-ins toolbox has been completely revamped form the pathetic excuse for a UI it was before!
|
|
|
|
|
daggyosires wrote:
what do you mean by that?????
Without this tool, how to you see the source code of the .NET framework?
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if there is any advantage doing that as a addin....
|
|
|
|
|
<sarcasm>Why use intellisense when you have the MSDN documentation waiting for you. Huh?</sarcasm>
|
|
|
|
|
<getreal>Nothing better to do??
|
|
|
|
|
Minase Tue wrote:
Nothing better to do??
|
|
|
|
|
However we are not paying attention to other articles such as line counter and Collection builder or even Code store, these have put a lot of work on the addin and not around existing ideas.;P
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
