|
dandy72 wrote: I have to imagine that it ultimately goes through a clean WM_CLOSE request
But then Chrome would simply restore the tabs, like it does when I explicitly hit the close button.
Latest Article - Code Review - What You Can Learn From a Single Line of Code
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Look in the history of the browser 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
It's still a needle in a haystack. I had to load a lot of useless pages before I settled on what I had opened.
Besides - I was just pointing out MS's futile attempt at being useful. I wasn't really looking for a way to reload those pages.
Oh - and I have the browser set up so it always loads in private mode by default, so nothing's ever saved - including browsing history.
|
|
|
|
|
Next time shut your computer down without closing Edge...
If you do that it seems it remembers the opened tabs...
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't explicitly close any browser.
Are you implying doing a shutdown, then restarting (obviously), results in different behavior than letting Windows restart the computer on its own?
|
|
|
|
|
I have to learn reading again...
I don't know why I have answered this given your question... 
|
|
|
|
|
 I was a little confused by your answer. S'all good.
FWIW - I'm using IE (seriously). I try to avoid Chrome, but I also can't get used to Edge and I keep going back despite my best efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got used to Edge... at the beginning it was rendering images weirdly, now it works well.
In some cases though I've seen some forms that are not working well... in those cases I'm using the latest Firefox, it is lightweight and it works well...
|
|
|
|
|
Joan M wrote: I'm using the latest Firefox, it is lightweight and it works well...
It's been a long time I've seen those two words being used in the same sentence without also seeing the word "not" in there somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Has anyone come across a shelf desk space extendor that would be long enough to be above monitors.
things like the following desk clamp shelf - Google Search[^]
but more stable like [^]
At home I screwed in some wooden shelf brackets into my desk, then attached to a wall upright rails
[ image here]
with shelf then attached to the uprights.
And then been trying to find something more "professional" looking, for the office desk, which attaches with clamps to the back, save needing to screw into the desk. about 1 meter off the desk to clear raised monitors.
Sounds like something ikea would sell by the thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you could take a cheap IKEA "Lack" table and glue that onto your desk: LACK Salontafel[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Totaly forgot that I have previously used the Billy on top of a desk. only problem is the base takes makes the bottom a bit cumbersome.
Billy shelves[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Why not a couple of vesa support arms to hold your monitors where you need them?
See[^]
Two of them are better if you have a very deep table as then you can adjust them individually...
|
|
|
|
|
I already have the monitors on arms.
At work, there is no personal storage/draws, so desk space as a tech/developer with to much paper, hardware, spare parts filled up.
So there no space above my computer, why not used all that empty air. And not near a wall, so idea of "normal" shelves wont work.
but like the following Shelves above desk[^] but mounted and connected to the desk instead of a wall.
Image an office space like this image[^]. Some shelves ontop of bracket like holders still allows a whole through to chat to the person on the opposite side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woah!
that second link is marked as a harmful web site by Bitdefender!
|
|
|
|
|
maze3 wrote: that would be long enough to be above monitors.
Myself I wouldn't really want to have the opportunity to put potentially heavy objects above my monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 12
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's shacked up somewhere with Win 9.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Are you suggesting that not only 7 8 9, but 7 8 11? Or is that 10 8 11?
|
|
|
|
|
By now, even a new-ish member should know that MicroSloth will do it doggy style.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting link. I believe that the last time I have understood so little in a piece of text I had been reading, it was written in old Sumerian language.
|
|
|
|
|
What's the problem? I understood all the words.
It's just the sentences I had difficulty with.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
A Operating System Update or what ?