Spam and Abuse Watch

Spam would be members - escorts,insurance

5-Dec-17 16:45

alicaabacon - Professional Profile[^]
Paine Tomz - Professional Profile[^]

modified 6-Dec-17 3:08am.

Karthik_Mahalingam5-Dec-17 16:26

RRLE Park Lane Escorts - Professional Profile[^]
New House Insureance - Professional Profile[^]

5-Dec-17 16:26

Re: Spam would be members - escorts,insurance - One down, one to go

Richard Deeming6-Dec-17 9:29

Plagiarised would be article - gone

6-Dec-17 9:29

Escorts escorted out of the building; dyslexic insurance agents currently on 9.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

OriginalGriff5-Dec-17 9:10

Plagiarised would be article

5-Dec-17 9:10

This: Template Approach to Agility[^]
From this: 27#AmitRaj - Professional Profile[^]
Is partially copied from this: C++ Core Guidelines[^]
Search both for

Quote:
In a class template, nonvirtual functions are only instantiated if they're used

and cmpare the whole paragraph.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

modified 5-Dec-17 17:29pm.

OriginalGriff5-Dec-17 6:49

5-Dec-17 6:49

This: What is in LUIS[^]
From this: K Muralidhar - Professional Profile[^]
Is copied (and gently tweaked to hide it) from this: Language Understanding Intelligent Service (LUIS) |[^]
Search both for:

Quote:
LUIS uses the power of machine learning to solve the difficult problem of extracting meaning from natural language input, so that your application does

And you'll see what I mean.
Check out the images too!

Ten years he's been here. First post, and it's copy'n'paste. Sigh | :sigh:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

gone

Karthik_Mahalingam5-Dec-17 15:23

Site-driving spam in QA (Member 11006150)

5-Dec-17 15:23

Gone

Richard Deeming5-Dec-17 5:31

5-Dec-17 5:31

Spammer: Member 11006150 - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Member questions & answers[^]

Resurrecting an already-answered question from February 2014 to post a link to his own blog. D'Oh! | :doh:

He also has an article[^] from March with multiple links to his blog.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

JustWatchLittle 5-Dec-17 6:19

5-Dec-17 6:19

Only a question from a noob.

What is wrong to give a link to a blog, while it is possible to publish a blog directly in CP?

Thanks in advance.

Richard Deeming5-Dec-17 6:23

5-Dec-17 6:23

JustWatchLittle wrote:
What is wrong to give a link to a blog,

In principal, nothing. But in this case, the question was already answered almost four years ago.

And if that wasn't enough, the user deliberately tried to disguise the fact that it's his own blog he's linked to.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

OriginalGriff5-Dec-17 6:29

5-Dec-17 6:29

Plus he's been here three years, and actively visiting for the last year...

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

Richard Deeming5-Dec-17 6:36

5-Dec-17 6:36

So he should know better. Big Grin | :-D

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

OriginalGriff5-Dec-17 6:43

5-Dec-17 6:43

Precisely! Big Grin | :-D

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

JustWatchLittle 5-Dec-17 7:00

5-Dec-17 7:00

Ok, I can't see the answer because it has been deletet. I only remember a Statement from Chris Maunder, something like "there is nothing wrong to answer an old question. Even it is allready answered technics can Change". I don't find it at the Moment...

Thanks anyway.

Richard Deeming5-Dec-17 7:08

5-Dec-17 7:08

There's nothing wrong with answering an already-answered old question, if the answer adds some new or interesting information to the discussion.

Rocking up to an old, solved question and just dumping a link to his blog is site-driving spam. It wasn't intended to add to the discussion; it was just intended to increase the SEO ranking of his blog.

Adding a message to suggest that he'd just "found" that link, when it's actually his own blog, is just dishonest.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

JustWatchLittle 5-Dec-17 7:10

5-Dec-17 7:10

I agree
[Edit]
I'm just trying not to blindly follow the herd Wink | ;)

Richard Deeming5-Dec-17 7:27

5-Dec-17 7:27

JustWatchLittle wrote:
I'm just trying not to blindly follow the herd

A noble quest. Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

JustWatchLittle 5-Dec-17 8:52

5-Dec-17 8:52

I only try my best. There is a big Chance to fail on this because of missing Information Sniff | :^)

gone

Karthik_Mahalingam5-Dec-17 15:22

Article forum spammer - gone

5-Dec-17 15:22

Gone

Jochen Arndt5-Dec-17 2:29

Jochen Arndt

5-Dec-17 2:29

User: tarun _sharma - Professional Profile[^]
Messages (2 spam, 1 not): Latest Messages[^]

Member since 2009 with one message from 2013 and started now spamming for SEO services.

modified 5-Dec-17 9:53am.

Spammer from moderation queue (Member 13559182) - gone

OriginalGriff5-Dec-17 1:50