|
I have the same problem on my account.
Recent incident from this article (AGauge) WinForms Gauge Control
No emails received in my Gmail, certainly not issue of firewall / SPAM / JUNK.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
I checked my spam filter and there is nothing from the codeproject. I also do not receive notifications when somebody replies in this forum. Can you check if the emails get send out? My article was moved by an admin a while back and I believe that is where it stopped working.
Stephan
modified 9-Jan-18 6:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
Your email needs to be confirmed. I've had a reconfirmation email sent to you. Just click the link in the email and you'll be good to go.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Got it, I confirmed and will check if notifications work now.
Thx
Stephan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blimey is that font size 0.01?
|
|
|
|
|
It's squished to fit the text width - open the image in a new tab and it's readable.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I've got a decent size screen, so it looks OK to me.
And once my new glasses are ready, I might even be able to read it! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I've got a decent size screen
Yes, it's almost readable on my 68" TV.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 20-Nov-17 9:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
The "images/downloads offsite" and "missing images/downloads" are not available in the "need help" report menu for tip/tricks.
Is that on purpose?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
+1
even i thought that.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
just a short suggestion from my side.
I do not bookmark articles very frequently but here and there one rises up that I want to keep.
And every time, when it's been a bit longer since my last bookmark, I get confused by the bookmark icon again.
If you have not bookmarked the article, it shows a plain bookmark icon, but once you have bookmarked it, the icon changes to a bookmark containing a "+" symbol... the latter I would interpret to "add this as bookmark" and not as "it is already bookmarked".
An icon should always show what will happen, and not what has happened when you clicked the icon the last time.
I hope my english is good enough that you understand what I mean.
So my suggestion is: the bookmark icon with the + in it should be when i CAN bookmark it, and when I already HAVE bookmarked it, the + should change to... maybe a checkmark?
thanks for reading, cheers Mike
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Actually (just tested it) you can't remove the bookmark by clicking the bookmark-icon on the article again - you have to remove it from your bookmarks list. And if you reload the page of an article which you already have bookmarked, the bookmark-icon gives no indication of that.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: you can't remove the bookmark by clicking the bookmark-icon on the article again - you have to remove it from your bookmarks list.
I already suggested about that some days ago 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This has been added.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My expirience is, that this "+" is anyway only showed when you currently Bookmark an article, means if you visit a bookmarked article later it does not Show it again.
So I think, while bookmarking one can assume that the user can remember his click .... 
|
|
|
|
|
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - that was poor UI. Fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... the Employment Opportunities[^] page a little.
Currently, you are still seeking a 3 month contractor who can start in 2013, and a C# / ASP.NET Developer - Permanent who lived in Toronto four years ago ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A while ago I published an article on LDAP searching. I made a number of revisions. At one point I deleted the article and started over. Now in google searches, the deleted article is coming up.
DELETED: https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1211551/LDAP-Search-Utility
PUBLISHED: https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1212134/LDAP-Search-Utility
"In quiet and silence, the truth is made clear."
|
|
|
|
|
This will be fixed after our next deploy, and then whenever Google decides to update its index. Hours, days, months...?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I expect that this has been asked for before (but I'm too lazy to look for it). If this feature already exists, I apologise; but if it does exist, where is it?
Please could there be a 'Next Unread' / 'Prev Unread' button for the various forums. I have just spent a fruitless half an hour searching Weird and Wonderful for an unread message because the forum index had an orange dot indicating that there was a new message.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to find the latest messages is to use the forum search box:
(The one at the top of the forum, not the one in the menu bar!)
Search for *, and it will return all messages in descending date order.
Eg: Search[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The issue with this is defining "read". We can do it two ways: either anything posted since your last visit (inaccurate but do-able), or we track every time you click to open a message and store that as "read". So thousands of records for 10s of millions of members. Again, do-able but it's a lot of storage and processing (though Redis can probably do this quickly).
We did have a filter (which is still in the code) which would restrict the message list to a date subset. That could be used to filter messages to those posted since your last visit. Unfortunately the implementation is database heavy (the reason it was removed).
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
