|
I have developing application in WPF. User can add controls from toolskit where controls will add to the canvas.
In this scenario, values changed in one control should reflect in another control.
How do I implement this?
Thanks,
Venu
|
|
|
|
|
You're at the wrong part of the website; this is the Lounge. For programming questions, the link above in bold red is where you need to ask. [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Or you could ask in the dedicated WPF forum!
The answer is to bind both controls to the same data source.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
... and you didn't flag this as a rant? You're slipping! 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Add reference to Nuget System.Net.Http (V 4.3.2) package
And there's the problem. Again. And again. And again. Ad nauseum.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
My new favourite error: Quote: Could not load file or assembly 'netfx.force.conflicts' or one of its dependencies
Looks like it's a another bug[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: My new favourite error:
Ewww. And I suppose none of the "I solved it" posts worked?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
No - not one. [Update: I did find one that did - but by coincidence]
It's all System.Net.Http: If you add a reference to a framework assembly then it wants 4.1.1.1, but it can't find 4.1.1.1 in the framework assemblies so fails. I can, however, copy a version of System.Net.Http.dll into the directory and get it working for a Web Forms app.
However, on an MVC app that isn't working. It wants 4.2.0.0 when I've referenced 4.1.1.1, so I bite the bullet and add the Nuget ref to 4.2.0.0 and then it complains it can't find 4.1.1.1. I adjust the redirection in web.config so they all point to 4.2.0.0 (even though VS keeps wanting to set it as 4.1.1.1) and then I get the "can't resolve assembly". No version number now - just "can't find anything that works".
So my final workaround is
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity name="System.Net.Http" publicKeyToken="b03f5f7f11d50a3a" culture="neutral" />
<bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-4.2.0.0" newVersion="4.0.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
which is what someone else has also found: System.Net.Http package 4.3.2 - redirect to 4.2.0.0, assembly loading failure · Issue #22781[^]
Evidently: Quote: Looks like Visual Studio 2017 15.3 is shipping with a .NET 4.6.x System.Net.Http.dll with internal assembly version 4.2.0 and the latest Nuget Package assembly version is 4.1.1 for NetFX.
And the best bit?
Unless you clean out the bin completely before each rebuild (or, it seems, glancing away for 10 seconds) you get
Could not load file or assembly 'netfx.force.conflicts'
Which is evidently impossible but everyone's getting it.
A complete Charlie Foxtrot. I'm beyond pissed off at such a fundamental showstopper.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 18-Aug-17 17:23pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The way Microsoft is behaving these days, I am sure they will come out with a SaaS solution, which you can get from Microsoft Azure, just make sure you have a valid subscription. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I'm sorry I haven't been posting during the day, except well new job, don't want the standard to slip just yet. It is kinda cool, I get to break things and test them to see if they work. Also is it a good sign I have been invited to the Christmas do (they send invites in August?). I can look just not post at the moment...why was Mike Martin (or Mike Farrrkking Hunt as he was earlier) on a tirade? so body spilt his ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) ???
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: why was Mike Martin (or Mike Farrrkking Hunt as he was earlier) on a tirade?
When is he not? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: Mike Martin
It's faarrrkkkking Mick!
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats! But don't they miss you at the pub?
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
|
There you go, you screwed up and paid your tab on your way out the last time. If you would have left it stand, they would miss you. A lot.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
True, that taught me not bury the bodies too deep next time! Quote: f you would have left it stand, they would miss you. A lot.
It would have been fun to do three rounds with the Texan ex-marine and finished the conversation with "not my problem, get the muppet who wrote it to sort it!" 
|
|
|
|
|
Why do hot dog buns come in packs of 8, but hot dogs come in packs of 10??
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
you're not buying enough at a time. you're supposed to buy four packs of hot dogs and five packs of buns.
|
|
|
|
|
I knew it had to be some sort of conspiracy
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Because some people, like me, like to go bun-less.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Commando weinies? 
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
This has been explained elsewhere.
Buns are less resilient than the hot dogs so it is often the case that a bun becomes soggy or ripped.
There are actuarial tables that show for every 8 hot dogs you need 10 buns because of loss.
Originally the bun-makers did this to be nice and then they lobbied and got a law put into place that states, Quote: "if consumer suffers no loss of bunnage, said consumer must throw away 2 extra buns".
You are illegally eating those extra buns and will be reported, post haste.
|
|
|
|
|
Hah, that sounds more like an American, no ARTE stuff
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
