|
These days, with more self-taught programmers in the market, it is no surprise to find anything UI or GUI ignored. My background is as a Mac programmer, and they had an entire manual on user interface design. Buttons were to be x pixels wide and y pixels tall. Today, finding even evenly spaced buttons is a joy.
I not only feel responsible for making the GUI make sense, but to make the user experience as easy and intuitive as possible. Most projects do not allow me time to go back and "clean up", so extra effort has to go in at the beginning to click all the proper properties and use the correct widgets.
Back to dates, since I deal with a lot of vendors and different business sites, my default is YYYY-MM-DD with YYYY-MMM-DD for monthly reports to differentiate them from daily or one time. A side advantage of this is that daily or one-time reports sort properly in the directory.
I have found that projects dealing with multiple vendors and multiple departments quickly adapt to this and I do not have to enforce it. That makes the project run smoother and interactions more friendly. It is the unknown and feeling like you aren't getting requirements that usually cause friction, so it is a proactive effort to get everyone speaking the same language and feeling comfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I liked that Oracle defaulted to dd-MMM-yy
and we used that a lot.
Over the years, I ultimately prefer some variation of YYYYMMDD and use that as time stamps for files, etc. I find it sorts nicely, is total unambiguous, and when combined with YYYYMMDD_HHNNSS it still sorts, and moves the ball forward.
But don't get me started on AM/PM... Who thought of that? And what were they thinking? And timezones, and Daylight savings time. Obviously not a lot of computer planning went into any of this when the first PC could not represent a date before 1/1/1900 lol.
Finally. Where is the metric system when you need it. There should be 10 seconds per minute. 10 minutes per hour, 10 hrs per day, and 10 days per month, etc... How much easier would life be then?
|
|
|
|
|
> 10 seconds per minute.
That would be a very short minute. In fact, it would shorter than what we call a "moment" (around 20 seconds, since the middle ages)
|
|
|
|
|
First, you have to know your audience. The software I develop is only used in the US, so 06/07/2017 is unambiguous.
That being said, it could be improved. Why shouldn't we say June 7, 2017, just in case we ever get a ROW contract?
To answer your question, UI is our responsibility in a similar way that good design principles, good data structures, etc are our responsibility. Part of our role is to be consultants to the business people, and point out these kinds of problems when we think of them.
In the same way we might raise issues with how data actually is related when gathering requirements (for example), by asking deeper questions during the requirements phase based on our experience, we should raise these kinds of issues at that time.
For with this specific issue, though, just having a software standard seems like a good idea: dates should be displayed as <good worldwide="" format=""> or <user's specified="" culture=""> or whatever works for you.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer some variation on yyyy-MMM-dd, although for some cultures it may be yyyyy-MMM-dd or even yyyyyy-MMM-dd. But that's because I like easy sorting, something that is easy to do with a computer but not so easy in a paper ledger.
If you know that the application is going to be used on a system that supplies a default date formater, always use that. If the user doesn't have it set to what they like at least it will be consistent with most of the other software the user uses.
Or you can work in an industry that specifies the format that everybody has to follow. In my case that is ddMMMyy or ddMMMyyyy both of which are pain to sort if all you have is text. 
But to answer the question...
It depends.
For a legacy UI that you don't have time/budget/permission to recode and regression test, stay with the same format of data display. Changing it for your piece will generate user irritation because it is different, or will make them irritated with the older portion because it's not as nice as the new part.
For new code, use system defaults. Maybe add a section to documentation about setting the system date. Of course that has it's pitfalls as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes we have a responsibility when creating a UI. You seem to be forgetting what the U stands for. When people talk about dates, people will say "June Seventh" way more often than they say "Seventh of June". Also when presented with a list of dates, having things in mm/dd format makes them more easy to compare at a glance. If you are designing middleware you can be as logical and unambiguous as you please. But if you design a UI and prioritize your personal sense of logic and order above what the users feel is comfortable and familiar your design will be a failure.
|
|
|
|
|
The way american Papuan speaks has nothing common with how it should be written. If you see time "10 hours 12 minutes", IT IS NOT "thousand twelve", whatever military people say. Feel the difference? Same with dates, especially when only crazy USA has clumsy order "month day year".
Normal order is "day month year". Day number is more important than year. And if you exchange dates with other people, think twice before you force 'em to scratch head with your "17/7/17".
Universal date is quite simple: "dd MMM yyyy". No mistakes, no fighting, suits for much more people than living in america.
|
|
|
|
|
Your time example actually proves my point more than yours. The format you like: dd/mm/yyyy is in decreasing significance order, meaning most specific to least specific. So if you were to extend that with time then it would be ss:mm:hh dd/mm/yyyy. But I am sure that seems ridiculous to you. We all use cultural rules when choosing how to display data. Do you also insist that in languages that are read from right-to-left that they should switch to left-to-right because you feel it suits more people? If you were designing a UI with a status indicator and you chose a fairly standard red/yellow/green scheme would you refuse to change it after finding out your users were colorblind because the scheme suits more people? The point is that it is how your users feel about the way data is presented that matters. That is a higher responsibility than adherence to rules you feel are "universal".
|
|
|
|
|
You prove yourself the way you like, but nothing meaningful to me.
If some doc needs timestamp, it's quite easy: "17 Feb 2017 15:27" - format understandable by all humans in the world. Everything else you wrote - TL;DR
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that works just fine unless they speak only Russian, or Chinese (which accounts for quite a large number of the humans in the world). The fact that you TLDR for a single paragraph means you have no interest in learning anything and are willing to stay ignorant. Good luck with that.
|
|
|
|
|
Using an abbreviation of a localised String is what you call "understandable by all humans in the world"?
I hope no-one ever lets you near a UI.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to say? Just stay away. Nobody ask your pathetic opinion what I should develop, panda!
Date is date - it's year-month-day OR day-month-year. Idiots from America "thinks different", but these gays nobody listen.
|
|
|
|
|
How many man-decades of work have been wasted debugging and fixing sh*t that developers like you make? Data must be unambiguous, and the user experience must adapt to the user (locale, formatting, etc).
modified 16-Mar-18 6:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah
Just try to implement dd-MMM-yyyy in many places only to have the [non-technical] "stakeholder" go 'Why is the date f!@#$% up? Go fix that. Our stupid users won't unnerstand'. Yes Biff - going Biff....
|
|
|
|
|
I always ignore american idiots and put date in "dd MMM yyyy" format, so you never mix what is it: "16 Feb 2017".
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it always helps to have empathy towards the end-user in order to achieve as much ergonomic and intuitive programs, but back to your case, the programmer in charge of redacting the database transaction layer is supposed to make sure that the date is stored using a time-stamp, whereas the UI programmer should take care of accordingly parsing this time-stamp on an end-user localization basis so that the end-user can for example always remotely generate a consistent receipt whatever his location.
But yes, both programmers can definitely be the same person. Presenting information to the world in various notations or languages require more UI efforts than using more standardized schemes, but have its charms.
In all cases, if the data is presented ambiguously, then the project is an epic failure (!?), with data dumped to the end-user becoming inconsistent so unusable, but in theory and back to your initial question, inside a project with respective road-maps for several programmers, it would be the UI programmer's job to properly dump / format data that have been consistently stored.
Kaveh Rassoulzadegan
|
|
|
|
|
This why we hire developers and designers.
And, FWIW: 20170809 FTW
|
|
|
|
|
Developers have a responsibility to understand the system that they are building, and preferably before they start building the system IMHO. How the system is intended to be used (via a User Interface), and by whom, is part of that understanding. Therefore the answer has to be 'Yes'.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I was surprised that this is even a question but pleased so many believe they are responsible for a user-friendly UI.
Absolutely, even if the programmer is given specific specifications, they need to validate what the user experience will be. We do not program stuff just to move data around. Ultimately a user must interface with the information and when they do, it should be as intuitive as possible. Nothing is more crazy making for the user than a UI that is confusing or ambiguous when the designer and programmer (and the whole team) have the power to make clean sensible user experiences.
|
|
|
|
|
Some fresh anecdotal feedback:
I just saw my app's reviews for last month - LiveStickies, a simple app I published for Windows Store. All of the reviews refer 2 things: "thank for the UI" (my pleasure), and "thank you for supporting language/characters/shortcuts". This just by supporting more languages than just English, even with only 2 or 3 translations. Hell, I even took 5 minutes to make sure support right-to-left systems is working.
You think the hipster silicon valley designer is going to even consider that 1/4 of the word population, when that population doesn't use a left-to-right writing? It's our job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This?
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yeah, that one has 10M+, others I saw didn't seem to.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)