|
Wait, what was the standard they used for changing this standard for standards?
|
|
|
|
|
Change control standards, which may be compliant with the new standard and authorized early as a policy exception (under the old standard), or is compliant with the old standard and will be updated on the next scheduled review.
...I shouldn't instantly know that. FML
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
I pity the poor shmucks that had to write that stuff, the committee that had to review it, the editor that had to edit it, etc.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Marc, there are no 'poor schmucks' who write that stuff. It grows all on its own, like a fungus.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I wish some tiny part of me could claim this wasn't believable. Having worked in government though, I have received similar and even been involved in projects with sub-sub-committees to decide what color to make the font. 
Your tax dollars at waste.
|
|
|
|
|
You should probably allocate twice as much time to any tasks to ensure both standards are followed in the meantime...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Having worked in government, I actually understood it on the 1st read! <G>
|
|
|
|
|
That's the reason why everything in government are two years behind and cost $30K a line of code, just to adhere to some useless standards. That's is not even include QA. Wait a minute. What is QA in government software?
|
|
|
|
|
Leaker!
|
|
|
|
|
Most people are quite rude at such an occasion, but not them![^]
|
|
|
|
|
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing polite about anything posted at CP in The Lounge.
[edit]
I take this back; I just found some polite stuff ...
[end edit]
modified 24-Jul-17 17:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a surprise! Did you ever sit through a baseball game?
|
|
|
|
|
| No
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
The pitchers use this to throw curve balls, to make them harder for the other team to hit.
|
|
|
|
|
I just got a sales call from 555-555-5555.
I wish all of the sales idiots would start using this so my rejected number list could get smaller...
BTW, does anyone know if there's a limit to how many numbers the rejected phone numbers list holds on a Samsung phone?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: BTW, does anyone know if there's a limit to how many numbers the rejected phone numbers list holds on a Samsung phone?
Let me Google it for you  
Google
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So... you expect people to open a link you posted rather than simply supplying the data you found? I've taken to not opening links in messages because, well.. people can't be trusted.
|
|
|
|
|
Well if you mouse hover over the link you will see that it points to google,
and doing that you also get
1. the most up to date results - not some stale copied/pasted info
2. more sure it's real info (the copied info may be altered before pasted)
3. correctly formatted at source as not all css/html pastes well into cp
4. and if you've set security properly you can't get bitten clicking on a link
or you can go on living in the dark
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
Or.. I can do the search myself, but the point was about providing information rather than simply providing a reference to the information.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, can see that but I'm the opposite in that I prefer the reference - particularly if to or links to reputable info such as the manufacturers page - to be more sure it's genuine rather than a guess, joke, fake, outdated or non applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: BTW, does anyone know if there's a limit to how many numbers the rejected phone numbers list holds on a Samsung phone?
Certainly when at last there is no more memory left to store them.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
