|
I appreciate the effort of the author of showing how to use the App in order to perform some rudimentary self-check on your own health, but the Articles is basically a presentation on how the app works, and the code itself is limited at 53 lines which just plot incoming data.
There is basically nothing personal, custom, in this project.
I was about to mark it as "Extremely Poor Quality", but then I thought it was better to see what other people think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean Ewington, would you please look into my reputation history. No big deal, but such an abuse needs your attention i think.
I'm sure it's an act of Hardevsinh Mori[^] who created different account as H M Mori[^] once the older one got blocked somehow.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 11-Sep-17 12:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. The votes should disappear by the end of the day. If this happens again, please let me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: The votes should disappear by the end of the day
It's totally fine if it remains there. I'm more concerned about the act. Thank you.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Article: SqlServer Clr functions utility[^]
I think, in general, we should have requested the author to fix the spelling and grammar before approving it. Any thoughts?
Example:
concactened, i setted , directoty, managment, This 3 functions, don t use it, have query more easy., Attacched
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
It depends.
And I think you know why.
|
|
|
|
|
For non-native english writers, like me, is not always so immediate. Especially if the article is long, and not made of just some chapters.
I would say that it depends on the quality of the article itself; I can easily go over some minor grammar mistakes if the article is in a good shape and has interesting contents.
|
|
|
|
|
Having a look at the code in this article the Sort method in XmlSorter is awfully close to the code provided originally here. Basically only the name of the first parameter is different...
Perhaps @sean-ewington could take a look?
|
|
|
|
|
I've been trying to guide this guy. I'm not sure if he's listening. I'll try one more time.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
This blog C# for beginners Part 3[^] is almost 5 years old. In my opinion, if someone have the heart to share something today, at least, share something that they contributed recently and not half a decade ago.
In addition the code block was poorly formatted and download link did not work.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so Member 0x01AA posts an old joke, drumming, etc.
If you find this Member's posts to be irrelevant or trivial, don't open them. Simples!
To mark them as Spam / Abusive is pretty petty.
Tolerance. (Peace, Love, Respect, ..., too, if you like.)
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen this guy promote his blog & Youtube channel in other article submissions this year. I thought that obvious self-promotion is not allowed. Is this type of self-promotion allowed? 
Latest example: Visual Studio Collection Visualizers[^]
|
|
|
|
|
In this specific case, I think he's trying to embed videos but doesn't know how we do it. I'll check out his other stuff.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was plagiarized. He just took the plagiarized material out and made a new account. I'll have a word.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting this here because I'm not sure about it.
The user Yogi S. - Professional Profile[^] has actual 3 articles and a pending one.
In each of his articles there is at least one link somewhere to his website (not counting the link from his profile). The links are to informational content and related but the website offers commercial services (hosting, domains, etc).
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just curious, if, I provide a comment under approve or report this [article/technical blog/whatever]. Who will see that comment? The author? The protector? Other moderator? The super moderator?
Comment[^]
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
If that goes where I think it goes then just admins (though 99.9% of the time it's me). This is where you write an additional comment if the report (extremely poor quality, for example) doesn't express enough of what your problem is with the work / individual.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
OK. Good to know. Thanks.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
I used the compare program from Compare Two Web Pages or Articles - Copyscape[^] and I noticed that most of the content are about 80-90% identical.
Working With Number – Infinity Adding – Decimal, Precise Float Calculation – Python
Working With Number – Infinity Adding – Decimal, Precise Float Calculation – Java
Working With Number – Infinity Adding – Decimal, Precise Float Calculation – PHP
Working With Number – Infinity Adding – Decimal, Precise Float Calculation – Perl
etc...
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Matthias
I try to run your sample in VS2012 , but not succeeded give me error
can you provide new version for your sample and source code
best regard
|
|
|
|
|
You're probably trying to send a message to an author of an article. If that is the case, then try posting the message into the discussion area in the end of the article instead of general forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Article: Create a Bitcoin transaction by hand[^]
During approval I wrote a message explaining what to do and that the article can't be published while the copyrights are unclear.
At least one image seems to be used without having been licensed. It contains a watermark (shutterstock). Shutterstock images must be licensed and require attribution.
[EDIT]
He has replaced the shutterstock image meanwhile. But the copyright for the other images is still unclear.
[/EDIT]
@sean-ewington : Can you please have a look.
At all others approving articles: Please check and read the comments before approving.
[EDIT]
I reviewed my old article forum messages and found some more:
Consume WEBAPI in Angularjs[^]
See my message during approval:
The image "Confused Blond Boy Shrugging Under Question Marks" is not free and requires that you have purchased a license.
If you have licensed it, you must add an attribution line below the image with copyright information and indicate that it is not free.
When not doing so the image would be covered by the article license (CPOL) which would be probably a violation of the license terms.
C#: How the Adapter Design Pattern Can Make Your Life Easier[^]
My comment during approval:
There are two problems with the images in your article.
The images are offsite which does not comply with the CodeProject article rules.
There are no indications for the image sources and copyrights.
While many images can be used free they often require attribution (like linking to the source, mentioning the creator, and specifying the license). So you have to check this for each image in your article. Even when there is no specific license, it is good style to provide some kind of attribution.
The official Wikipedia logo for example is published under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/[^] license which requires attribution. You are not allowed to use the image without attribution.
[/EDIT]
modified 1-Nov-16 9:03am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
