|
Why don't you write code to submit a web request without waiting for a response. You can probably get a substantial number of requests made in a matter of a couple of seconds.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
If you run a loop from console to hit the button a 1000 time it will block it with a 'Such a smart subject.' message, but not for a 100 long loop... 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I got the 1000 click one using a simple loop, even though it gives the message it still allows it.
The ones I still have to get are;
You didn't move for a day
You moved nonstop for 10mins
You moved nonstop for 1 hour (I'm guessing, it is still hidden)
You entered the button 1000 times
You held the button pressed for an hour
You held the button pressed for a day (guessing)
You moved in a circular motion
You made the window inactive for a day
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed if there is a message it also blocked...
To be honest all those 1000 and above are a bit boring - like debugging someone else's code...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sociopathy?
I don't believe in all these hippie-ish "new age" medicines.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there
we want to debug GASChedule. But it not starting on visual studio 2015. we got some errors. This errors are:
"Error C2338 <hash_map> is deprecated and will be REMOVED. Please use <unordered_map>. You can define _SILENCE_STDEXT_HASH_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS to acknowledge that you have received this warning. GenetikAlgoritma c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 14.0\vc\include\hash_map 17"
and
"Error C2664 'BOOL CFont::CreateFontW(int,int,int,int,int,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,LPCTSTR)': cannot convert argument 14 from 'const char [6]' to 'LPCTSTR' GenetikAlgoritma c:\users\özge\documents\visual studio 2015\projects\genetikalgoritma\genetikalgoritma\childview.cpp 115"
and
"Error C2664 'void ATL::CStringT<wchar_t,StrTraitMFC_DLL<wchar_t,ATL::ChTraitsCRT<wchar_t>>>::Format(UINT,...)': cannot convert argument 1 from 'const char [9]' to 'const wchar_t *' GenetikAlgoritma c:\users\özge\documents\visual studio 2015\projects\genetikalgoritma\genetikalgoritma\childview.cpp 163"
how can we fix it?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm not surprised you are having problem working with software you can't even read the hihlighted text at the top of the page, read it now and you may understand why you are not going to get a positive response from to this question in this forum.
Try Visual Studio Discussion Boards[^]. You probably won't get much of a response there because these issues look lik very specific problem with GASchedule. Try telling us a little more like what is GASchedule for a start.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you have some code written for a previous version of C++ (C++0x) and now you want to compile it with more modern C++ (C++11 or C++17). Try the C++ forums.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12888494 wrote: "Error C2664 'BOOL CFont::CreateFontW(int,int,int,int,int,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,BYTE,LPCTSTR)':
Replace the source for that with:
CFont::CreateFontW(int,int,int,int,int,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,SPAM,LPCTSTR)
|
|
|
|
|
Please to place mental litter generated while reading off-topic posts in appropriate waste container.
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Change career, you havent the first clue about software and compilers have you?
|
|
|
|
|
He posted in the wrong forum for sure but that's rude and in violation of rule #1 and #6 of this very forum. He obviously has an issue. To post this 10 hours after the initial post and 9 hours after he re-posted in the appropriate section after being told to is uncouth.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh come on, he hasn't even the most basic understanding of data types and casting.
And he asks for help debugging? It doesn't even compile!
modified 11-Dec-16 4:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
I had a C++/CLI project I had to migrate from VS2013 to VS2015 that wouldn't compile in VS2015. I had to manually edit the .csproj file because of nuances between the two versions. I'm not saying it's not his fault but to assume that incurs the assumption you've never run into the same situation.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure that happens, automatic conversion is bound to screw up sometimes but not being able to distinguish a const from non const data type is somewhat of an elementary failing wouldn't you say?
|
|
|
|
|
I think the issue has more to do with the character encoding used. He's attempting to assign an 8-bit encoding to a 16-bit value (char to wchar_t). Any non-character-encoding expert has probably run into the same problem before - I know I have. The base Windows types don't have very descriptive names so often I have to look up what they mean. Personally, I've never dealt with an LPCTSTR before only LPCSTR and LPTSTR.
|
|
|
|
|
Its not really a problem though is it, a new version of VS has headers with string definitions tightened up in functions. Just cast them and all will be well.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a problem if you don't even understand the basic premise of why that encoding is different. I've said it in the past - programming is an infinitely complex topic in which no one, and I mean NO ONE, has a full grasp. Lifetimes of work can be encapsulated in a single topic.
Munchies_Matt wrote: Just cast them and all will be well.
That's an easy statement to say when you're familiar with the topic being discussed. That's an entirely different monster when you have no character encoding experience or experience with Windows types. You even mention the fact that wchar_t is a header definition for an unsigned short in your response. How many average coders do you really expect to have read the header file for wchar.h or its equivalent? wchar_t isn't even universally accepted and the char32_t standard was implemented in 2011 to deal with that issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming the basic types are fundamentally correct, else it would have crashed anyway, all it needs is a cast. And it meerely takes a minute or two to read up the types if you are in doubt. Posting a question to a forum is lazy, and NOT the behaviour of an engineer.
|
|
|
|
|
Off-by-one errors, as the simplest form of error in possibly computing history, would like to have a word with you. Sometimes being blind to your own code or simply being ignorant of the context of your code is a fatal mistake. It is in this time of need that developers turn to their peers. Not to be berated but to be educated.
|
|
|
|
|
May be he doesn't have a basic understanding of casting, but that doesn't mean you've a reason to insult him, especially given the circumstances as highlighted by Jon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
An obvious red herring but I'll bite. Given other coding experience - yes I would. A single topic in which you are not well-versed is not indicative of a bad developer. QED.
|
|
|
|
|
Being too lazy to do your own research IS an indication of a bad engineer.
It is only when you have researched and boiled a problem down to a single, distinct question, that you seek the help of senior engineers. If I hadn't done that in my early days I would have got a roasting, and rightfully so!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
