|
Hi Marc,
This is in the Texas marketplace, bronze level for me+wife+child is $1050, up from $620.
Cheers,
Daaron
|
|
|
|
|
Daaron wrote: is $1050
Yup, adding spouse and dependents makes insurance insane.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: $360/mo
I do not know what you get for that money, but that must be one hell of good care...
I have highest level possible with my company and I pay about 200 NIS ($50)...
(And as I saw the healthcare here is better than the US, but I may be wrong)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: but that must be one hell of good care...
Nope, that's the lowest level, highest deductibles, they choose the provider (can't go out of plan) and no extras. To improve those options, I could go "silver" or "gold" level, I think gold was around $800/mo, for one person.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: And as I saw the healthcare here is better than the US, but I may be wrong
Healthcare, IMO, is better just about anywhere than in the US.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
There are cost sharing groups that work just like insurance but are not and they are way cheaper. I'm only familiar with Christian health sharing groups but there may be others. If you google "christian health sharing" you'll find some but you need to be Christian.  Perhaps google health sharing options.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ryan,
I have googled health sharing options, and the only ones appear to be Christian. However, that stipulation precludes me. I was hoping someone knew about a secular health share that I cannot find.
Cheers,
Daaron
|
|
|
|
|
Daaron wrote: that stipulation precludes me.
It's never too late. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You're going to have to either raise your rates to compensate for this or find a full-time gig with benefits. There's a reason why you'd typically ask for higher rates as an independent than a regular full-time employee would get, because you have to pay for all of your own "benefits" (medical, dental, life, disability, and try to save for retirement).
Another option would be to shop for insurance in surrounding states. If one is significantly lower, you may have to move down the road if you don't think you can raise your rates to match the insurance rate increases.
|
|
|
|
|
Cuba has great healthcare.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
...
...
...
Nope, I've got nothing.
Has anything interesting happened?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, nuthin' ever happens.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. They think that democracy should do what they think is good... I saw a statistics, that suggested that Trump was elected by under-educated, old, white male citizens... But even so - he was elected!!!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you talking about elections or erections?
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Yet Clinton actually got more votes, so it could be argued that democracy failed.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not know what are you voting for in the US... If for the person, than the US system is totally wrong. However if it is for party, it is not unheard that one party got slightly more votes but didn't formed the government and PM is from the other party... They call it coalition...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
They mistake democracy for equality, fighting against discrimination/sexism/racism. So when someone is either of these or doesn't have combating this as their main priority they believe its undemocratic. The same can be seen in Europe.
Basically their definition of democracy has shifted from being a system where you vote to being a set of values.
I do believe it's a big part because of this Trump was successful as well as "far" right parties keep gaining ground in Europe. The middle class in these countries has been left out of focus for so long that they feel threatened and even trampled upon so when someone appeals to them it doesn't matter that those values aren't a priority.
I read an article at cracked a few months ago that made me believe that Trump would win because of these reasons. One of the main parts of the article was that large swaths of America feels left out, mostly outside the bigger cities. Combine that with my view on American infrastructure severely lacking its relatively easy to see how he can appeal to so many.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Just the same as all the Bremainers demanding a second referendum.
|
|
|
|
|
I think part of why the Brexit side won is because of same processes. People who feel like decisions are taken from them, that their opinions doesn't matter. That their aren't allowed to be critical to immigration or the EU because they are privileged and white etc and constantly told that they are racist or xenophobe or uneducated etc. If these people had felt that their opinion was being taking in to consideration most likely enough people would have been swayed for the UK to remain and I believe the same thing is happening in a lot of EU countries. Just because you are white, male and less educated does it make your opinion less valued to those people? If you don't want them to lash out you can't be derogatory and instead make sure that they can trust that you are also working for a better future for them, not just everyone else. But that's one of the difficulties with politics find what appeals to people and express it correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a little bit more complicated than that.
Nobody in the UK really knew what they were being asked to vote for in June (it's November now and we're still none the wiser).
Requests for a second referendum are largely built upon the notion that if we're going to employ democracy we should do it properly rather than asking a vague question then treating the answer to that as a mandate for an un-elected PM to do whatever she fancies.
In the US, the question asked was a simple and unambiguous one of who should be president. The public voted and are going to get what they asked for. It's entirely different in that respect.
If PeejayAdams ever spoke about himself in the third person, I would not vote for PeejayAdams.
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: Nobody in the UK really knew what they were being asked to vote for in June
I did.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you could tell our glorious leaders - they don't seem to have the remotest idea.
If PeejayAdams ever spoke about himself in the third person, I would not vote for PeejayAdams.
|
|
|
|
|
Considering we are the first country to do this in the last 60+ years, I think they are correct to take it slowly.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
