|
I use Sublime also. It supports syntax highlighting. You having a rough day?  You need a hug? I can code one up for ya in JavaScript.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
If that didn't make your half program red, you use the wrong IDE. In fact a simple editor that highlight keywords would detect that (Why is the "funtion" not highlighted?). When people used notepad (not notepad++) for programming they had all these problems with typos and semicolons. Those were difficult ancient times...
|
|
|
|
|
Be mindful of the dark side...
|
|
|
|
|
I once spend 15 minutes trying to write a simple Hello World in JavaScript. I had pretty much the same problem. Boy, do you feel stupid when you have years of experience and fail at Hello World
Luckily I now know the problem is JavaScript, not me 
I find JavaScript doable nowadays, but only when I don't have to deal with other people's code.
|
|
|
|
|
Be glad that you hate it. A couple of my coworkers are full on Stockholm syndrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you think that's bad - you should try missing a semicolon after a class definition in C++
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really? No syntax hilighting? `function` is blue and `funtion` is grey. Or you're using the wrong editor.
Otherwise, prepend this to all your javascript:
var funtion = function(){ throw new Error("you typed _funtion_ instead of _function_"); };
var x = funtion() {};
|
|
|
|
|
[joke] pro tip: don't program in notepad [/joke]
Just use vscode[^]
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
I know the math is sketchy as hell but I love this any way.
Answer
| | 0 0 | = | 100 - 100 100 - 100 | | 0 0 | = | (10*10) - (10*10) (10*10) - (10*10) | | 0 0 | = | 102 - 102 10 * (10 - 10) | |
| 0 0 | = | (10 + 10)(10 - 10) 10 * (10 - 10) | | 0 0 | = | (10 + 10) 10 | | 0 0 | = | 20 10 | | 0 0 | = | 2 | PROVED |
Not my work but I couldn't find a good copy of the original image.
I had to type all the HTML by hand, sigh. Works on Firefox.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot factorize or simplify anything once you have a zero somewhere in a multiplication.
(10 + 10) x (10 - 10) = (1 + 45687) x (10 - 10) = (21321 + 765461364165) x (10 - 10)
The whole reasoning is therefore biased.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
I know but it makes most people do a double take and think about it for a bit.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: (10 + 10) x (10 - 10) = (1 + 45687) x (10 - 10) = (21321 + 765461364165) x (10 - 10)
10+10 = 20
10-10 = 0
20x0 = 0?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
And, which point are you trying to make?
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
i don'T get why you have so big numbers in the equation
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Just to express the fact that, once you have a zero involved somewhere in a multiplication, you cannot factorize or simplify anything.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
I see 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I had a friends college professor back in the 70's prove that 0 = 1. Using the same ideas. It took awhile to find the divide by 0. It always brings back fond memories of math.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, math. It's the closest we can get to a perfect system and yet it still has problems 
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
You hear that rumbling noise? It's every math professor who ever lived collectively turning in their graves.
Maybe your signature too. 
|
|
|
|
|
It's Wednesday and I needed a good laugh to start the day. 
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
the solution is actually in your signature, smart
|
|
|
|
|
I never did like that whole you can't divide by zero thing anyway. To me, something divided by nothing should be nothing {0} but according to math something divided by nothing is everything {inf}. Go figure.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you think about it, even -inf multiplied +inf should be -inf^2; and instead is only -inf.
Or inf - inf is indefinite. I d say it is zero! ...  what can we do? we are lost souls in a crazy world
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
