|
You assume I did not report it.
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
I know you didn't report it, because I checked the OP's message log, and only one person had downvoted the post (and that was me)... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Are you thinking about performance? If so, use the fastest but more inaccurate checks first. If they fail, return false. If they pass, then do the slower but more accurate checks. That way, the false results would be really fast. The true results would be a touch slower.
|
|
|
|
|
Should have waited until Friday, then post a Friday Programming Challenge (haven't had one for a while).
If you care about only ASCII characters, use an array of ints
If you want to support Unicode, use a Dictionary of ints
Iterate the strings
For each character in the first string, increment its respective value
For each character in the second string, decrement its respective value
At the end, all values should be zero
|
|
|
|
|
|
It could be a misunderstanding that 1 == best.
|
|
|
|
|
I see nothing there indicating that this is the person who voted.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The downvote and the comment came almost the same time, and there was only one vote when I posted the message.As downvote wants you to comment, I assume there wouldn't any other case.
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper.iics wrote: As downvote wants you to comment,
That's no longer true. Hasn't been true in quite a while now.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, in that case,I probably made a mistake.
Will delete this post. Thanks for clarification Pete.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you know who down-voted, and why are you complaining about it "in public."
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
I am not complaining. Just indicating an one of cases where person downvotes and then appreciates. Nothing else. 
|
|
|
|
|
As you can't see who downvotes you, how do you know it was this user? I saw nothing indicating that this was the case.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper.iics wrote: I am not complaining.
bullsh*t !
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
How did you know that he down-voted you?
|
|
|
|
|
He probably voted it down so that people won't read it, so won't recognise it when he plagiarises it.
At first glance, it looks pretty damned good. I've bookmarked it to read it properly later.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, he didn't vote for you at all ...
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Why do people always have to muddy the water with facts!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So friend of mine had a video on youtube for a long time and one of the commercial music company used it in their song without his consent. They posted song on youtube. Then they filed a complaint to Google and Google took down my friend's video as copyright infringement.
What can he do ?
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
virang_21 wrote: What can he do ?
Prove he posted it first.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
I should imagine that youtube has records of such things, so he just has to fill out a youtube complaint form to make them look more carefully.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Get a lawyer who is competent with IP issues.
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Blast them on social media and have his friends do the same.
|
|
|
|
|
Was the original video featuring your friend's song? As in he sang it? If so, you can sue the other company for copyright infringement. Talk to a lawyer.
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona OL Zach Hemmila dies in his sleep[^]
Only 22. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
