Click here to Skip to main content
15,900,511 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: Question w/o code Pin
Sumuj John21-Jul-16 13:07
professionalSumuj John21-Jul-16 13:07 
GeneralRe: Question w/o code Pin
Mike Hankey21-Jul-16 13:28
mveMike Hankey21-Jul-16 13:28 
GeneralRe: Question w/o code Pin
Sumuj John21-Jul-16 13:29
professionalSumuj John21-Jul-16 13:29 
GeneralWell then... Pin
Brisingr Aerowing21-Jul-16 7:33
professionalBrisingr Aerowing21-Jul-16 7:33 
GeneralRe: Well then... Pin
R. Giskard Reventlov21-Jul-16 7:55
R. Giskard Reventlov21-Jul-16 7:55 
GeneralRe: Well then... Pin
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz21-Jul-16 11:20
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz21-Jul-16 11:20 
GeneralHow about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Chris Maunder21-Jul-16 6:58
cofounderChris Maunder21-Jul-16 6:58 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? PinPopular
Richard Deeming21-Jul-16 7:13
mveRichard Deeming21-Jul-16 7:13 
Seems like an awful idea to me - I want code that silently swallows exceptions to be a pain to write.

However, you could always add the suggestion to the Roslyn GitHub repo[^] for discussion. It doesn't seem half as mad as some of the other suggestions on there! Smile | :)



"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer


GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Ryan Peden21-Jul-16 9:08
professionalRyan Peden21-Jul-16 9:08 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Richard Deeming21-Jul-16 9:20
mveRichard Deeming21-Jul-16 9:20 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Ryan Peden21-Jul-16 9:28
professionalRyan Peden21-Jul-16 9:28 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Richard Deeming21-Jul-16 9:51
mveRichard Deeming21-Jul-16 9:51 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
BillWoodruff21-Jul-16 13:54
professionalBillWoodruff21-Jul-16 13:54 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Richard Deeming22-Jul-16 2:24
mveRichard Deeming22-Jul-16 2:24 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
BillWoodruff24-Jul-16 14:58
professionalBillWoodruff24-Jul-16 14:58 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
#realJSOP21-Jul-16 7:19
professional#realJSOP21-Jul-16 7:19 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Corporal Agarn21-Jul-16 7:27
professionalCorporal Agarn21-Jul-16 7:27 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Sander Rossel21-Jul-16 20:42
professionalSander Rossel21-Jul-16 20:42 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
#realJSOP21-Jul-16 23:36
professional#realJSOP21-Jul-16 23:36 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Eddy Vluggen21-Jul-16 7:46
professionalEddy Vluggen21-Jul-16 7:46 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Chris Maunder21-Jul-16 8:09
cofounderChris Maunder21-Jul-16 8:09 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Gary Wheeler22-Jul-16 1:05
Gary Wheeler22-Jul-16 1:05 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Vark11121-Jul-16 7:47
Vark11121-Jul-16 7:47 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
OriginalGriff21-Jul-16 8:02
mveOriginalGriff21-Jul-16 8:02 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Nish Nishant21-Jul-16 8:13
sitebuilderNish Nishant21-Jul-16 8:13 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.


Straw Poll

Were you affected by the geomagnetic storms this past weekend?
Communication disruptions, electrified pipes, random unexplained blue-screens in Windows - the list of effects is terrifying.
  Results   488 votes