|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
vigek - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 27-Jan-16 7:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to add the link to the user: Valli Sheik - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
That way, we can kick him off the site as well.
Plagiarists are not welcome here - and a blatant copy like this deserves everything he gets! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What I would like to know that how that 'article' got approved? Even one didn't recognized the plagiarism - it is so wrongly formatted, that should not pass moderation anyway!!!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Because we have a lot of new moderators who I suspect are approving anything
1) Because they can.
2) Because they are mates.
and 3) For the rep points.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I would really appreciate if admin can take a look and send them a message who are really approving bad articles.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Too much for them to check.
That's why I suggested to make the "approvers" visible for a certain group of people (Menthors, Protectors, MVP or whatever combination / new criteria), that way it would be easier to discover patterns. What action to do with infractions... CP call, but at least we could help to keep the quality standard in the position it deserves for this site.
It is very difficult to control every moderated item in every moment, but sooner or later we find out "not really deserved" approved items.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
1) Cooooolll... I have new powers...
2) There we can help (see my comment above)
3) I would give no reputation for approval action.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: 3) I would give no reputation for approval action.
Not sure: moderation is adding value to the site - when it's done properly - so some kind of reward is justified.
But I don't think it should be an "automatic right" if you get to a particular level as at present. I still feel that you should have to have articles / tips approved so you know what is expected and just how much work is involved first. At the moment, someone who has never even looked at an article here can vote to approve his mate's copy 'n' paste homework answer...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I see your point. I have less than 500 points in author and would not mind to be excluded if your proposal gets active (I would at least go for gold before allowing approval).
The "biggest problem" I can see is the probably accumulation of queued items, because it will take longer to get approved.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably, yes. But... This site is about good quality articles first and foremost (like SO is - or was - with questions and answers) so a little extra time to ensure that the quality didn't get diluted is a price I'd be happy to pay. Particularly if I was wanting to use it on my resume, and most of the rubbish ones seen to be there for...: sigh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: This site is about good quality articles first and foremost
Totally agree with you
OriginalGriff wrote: so a little extra time to ensure that the quality didn't get diluted is a price I'd be happy to pay.
Me too
OriginalGriff wrote: Particularly if I was wanting to use it on my resume, and most of the rubbish ones seen to be there for...
most of the worst contributions are just for that reason. And that is the pity. They are publicing bullsh... and reducing the quality just to say... hey I have an article in CP
Which actually is galaxies away of the original goal of the site and the regular users.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article: YQL, XML, Yahoo APIs and C# - CodeProject[^]
User: [deleted; see below]
Copied and pasted the definitions from Web API - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[^] without even changing the font.
[EDIT]
Author replied immediately to my comment on the article that he will update it. Because he already has an article and three tips that are OK, I suggest to not report his account this time when the above article is gone or updated.
[/EDIT]
modified 26-Jan-16 7:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
deleted
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CSharp Tutorial Code Book - CodeProject[^] This article is nothing but a code dump of all the C# tutorial codes.
This is definitely not an article but my concern is, if this code dump is taken from the book (attached CD if any) he has mentioned "Ilustrated C# 2012 2nd Edition".
If that is the case, this article needs to be nuked but I don't have this book for reference. Can anyone do a due diligence?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I stumbled over it too.
The sources from the book can be downloaded here: Illustrated C# 2012 - Apress IT eBooks & Books[^].
I had a quick look but did not find copied sources so far. It seems that he refers to the book as C# reference.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw it as well, and suspected the same - but I don't think it is.
If you go here: Illustrated C# 2012 - Apress IT eBooks & Books[^] you can download the CD samples and a quick check says they aren't the same at all.
They may be stolen from elsewhere - I'd certainly believe it - but it isn't from the book he references unless he's done a lot of work to restructure them (and add comments!)
It's just not an article IMO.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
