|
"Mental bullying" is sometimes a consequence of the "bully" (i.e. nerd) having been picked on by thicker jocks back in high school; what goes around comes around.
Blame the jocks. 
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few points that are relevant here.
First, a recent study found that more experienced people are more closed-minded about new or different concepts in their field. Further, other people thought that was justified because of their experience. So, some of the resistance to new concepts comes from that area. It has always been the case that to make major advances in a field of knowledge it is necessary for the older generation to die off or retire. This is a problem in every field. All you can do about it is to try to be aware of the tendency in yourself and avoid it whenever possible.
A non-computer example is set theory which allows a set to be a member of itself. This is accomplished by removing the Foundation Axiom (which explicitly prohibits it) and tweaking the definition of identity. It has been shown that such a set theory is consistent if and only if normal set theory is consistent. But, it allows so much more to be done, is a complete superset of normal set theory and avoids many problems. But, the older generation either completely rejects it, or sidelines it as a curiosity when those working in the field should have been all over it.
Second, sometimes a "package" result is really required because the effort of developing it yourself is prohibitive. As a personal example, I am extremely good with mathematics. However, it has been several decades since I last used Calculus or Differential Equations (I use mathematics daily, just not in that area). So, if I need something that is expressed or derived using those tools, I would need to spend weeks or months coming back up to speed on the needed mathematical tools. When experienced people in a field can provide a relative simple set of rules or guidelines, or a canned generic solution that is definitely worthwhile. It is not the same as trying to get someone to do your homework.
An example here is the FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) or Wave Packets. It is not necessary to understand the derivation of the transform when all you need is an algorithm. It is possible to understand the underlying concepts without wading through the mathematics. Suppose you want to transform an audio file in some way. All you really need is an algorithm. Your task has almost certainly been done many times before. There are many people with a solid understanding of the mathematics and of the algorithm. They can easily provide assistance that is extremely valuable to a fellow programmer that just needs to add a minor feature to a product. Management might allow a couple of days, but not months for something like that. So here, a "package" solution is exactly what is required.
Finally, no matter what, posts should be polite, grammatical, spelled correctly and written as if you were sitting down with a quill pen and parchment to write a letter. Courtesy hurts no one. Posting to a forum, sending a text or writing an email is fundamentally no different that writing a letter with a quill pen. Only the technology is different.
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus, people are stupid. And lazy. And don't even try to solve problem - they cry like a child - "mom, heeelp!". It's infantile behaviour and what's sad they continue to behave like that even being 40 y/o! So I don't allow lazy morons to WASTE MY TIME. If question is simple, GOOGLE IT! Right now. Time is priceless and we should save it for bigger things!
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion: On-line postings tend to bring out the worst in many people for some reason. Some times, because we can't see the facial expression or hear the tone of voice, the posting becomes negative even when not intended that way. The fact that we've now gotten to where some don't even use words, they've gone back to the per-literate days of pictographs (emojis and the like), is a major problem. They can't take the time to give a complete, unhurried answer while "keeping a civil tongue" in their heads. E-mail and postings tend to be done in a manner not consistent with proper written correspondence; they seem to encourage errors of grammar, spelling, usage and a lack of politeness. The writers appear to have not made it past 2nd or 3rd grade English class.
However, I've been in the computer industry for 50 years and can state that people displaying all the negatives you mention have been behaving in those ways for at least as long as I've been involved. In fact even longer. My father started with these beasts in 1934 (Electronic Accounting Machines) and told of unpleasant, mean spirited, uncooperative, and unsharing people even then.
I fully second your request for civil, cooperative behavior by those in all areas of computing.
Charles Wolfe
C. Wolfe Software Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Out of interest has anyone added google analytics to an article they have written ? I have generated some html using the google analytics web site and was curious how to insert it into an article. Or is this thing frowned upon/banned ?
Here is the HTML
<script>
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
})(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
ga('create', 'UA-69072944-4', 'auto');
ga('send', 'pageview');
</script>
|
|
|
|
|
Custom scripts in articles tends to be frowned upon. You'd have to seek permission from the site owners to allow you to include it.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - no scripts in articles unless those scripts are specifically to illustrate a Javscript / CSS technique (and even then an editor would need to do it)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I have a question. When I publish article on my blog and then is consumed by codeproject, it is usually in wrong section with wrong tags and also I need to change short description etc..
Can I somehow tell to codeproject that I want article to be consumed, but not publish it right away? just consume it as pending?
|
|
|
|
|
It should not be published directly. It actually should go to the moderation queue where you can still edit it and make the corrections you want.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have come up with a very useful little C# Class that can maintain a history stack for any Type (i.e., it's a generic Class), and serialize/de-serialize the stack, and "current value." The user specifies a fixed size-limit for the stack when creating an instance of the Class, and if that limit is exceeded, the oldest item is removed from the stack.
Of course, I intend to publish the source (which is not that long). And, I intend to discuss the design decisions involved such as why I did not actually use the Stack<T> .NET generic data structure.
My sense is this probably should be a tip/trick, but being aware of what passes for articles these days (and what passes for tip/tricks), I'm not absolutely certain that just because the content would be "relatively short" that it should not be posted as an article.
Appreciate your thoughts, Bill
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
modified 18-Nov-15 1:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
If I read the above correctly, you are explaining how to use one small specific feature. It certainly sounds like a Tip. And you will most likely get just as many votes.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Richard, yes, I agree with you, and I will post as an article only if there is substantial content added that puts the code in a broader context.
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
If it is only a description and extension is short I would go for Tip/trick.
If you are going to explain what happens, why you took one way and its advantages... it might go through as article though.
BillWoodruff wrote: being aware of what passes for articles these days (and what passes for tip/tricks),
Friends and socket puppets are often faster than usual moderations 
Me and many others still try to rise the point as much as possible, but still difficult to fight against it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Nelek, I will post as an article only if there is substantial content added that puts the code in a broader context.
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I have submitted a Tip/Trick with an attached zip file containing the source code which has been approved and published. The source can be read in the article (by using 'Browse Code') but somehow there is no button to download the file. The article is freshly uploaded and approved. Is the code still in quarantaine or something alike?
Cheers,
veen_rp
|
|
|
|
|
Downloads don't automatically get added to articles. You have to include a reference to them in the same way you would with a picture.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I will. 
|
|
|
|
|
I sometimes have an issue when I paste code into an article and then set the code formatting style and language type. The HTML comes out wrongly and in the preview mode this gives unsatisfactorily results. Is this a known issue? Or is it my browser, I use Opera? Or is it me?
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
I am using the CodeProject editor to edit an article I have written. When previewing the edits, the images included with the article are not displayed but instead appear as blank sections. Editing the image properties requires entering a URL. The default URL references the location of the image on my computer instead of the CodeProject site. My question, how do I change the URL to reference the images previously uploaded to the CodeProject site so that the images are correctly displayed when previewing the article? More specifically, what should be included in the URL?
Thanks,
Ian
modified 8-Nov-15 21:30pm.
|
|
|
|
|
To include images you need to first upload them (drag and drop them onto the area of the wizard for file uploads) then you can reference them in your article using
<img src="image.png">
Where image.png is the filename of your image. Don't add any path info - the wizard will fix all of that up for you.
In the list of images you've uploaded, just to the left of the image name, is a small arrow icon which, when clicked, will insert the image at the current cursor location.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Is looking beautiful! 
Including LaTeX and images!
Chris, how is it looking for you? Still see black boxes instead of formulas?
Maths in IT #2: Venn diagrams[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I am posting a second part of an article, should I post as a new article or as an alternative to the original article?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
