|
RyanDev wrote: So, the only conclusion that seems logical is that you are unaware that not everyone thinks the same way you do.
Nope. If that was the case, why would I be asking you to explain your thinking? I'd just assume that you thought the same way as me, and were just being a contrary bugger for the fun of it. 
RyanDev wrote: If your wife says, "Stop making comments" would you react the same exact way if she said, "Shut up."
If your wife told you to "stop f***ing talking", would that not count as telling you to shut up?
So, on the internet, doesn't telling someone to "stop doing F******* comment" count as well?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: If your wife told you to "stop f***ing talking", would that not count as telling you to shut up?
So, on the internet, doesn't telling someone to "stop doing F******* comment" count as well?
Now you're changing which quote your referring to just to suit your argument. Not interested.
I can go to the soapbox and chat with Mark or Collin to get this kind of behavior. No thanks.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I already stated 3 times that the comment you are talking about is not Abusive,but it is edited version and the problematic part was removed once i reported it here. Further,he made the same comment(original version) to another member. How on earth do you think that making such comments repeatedly doesn't mean Abusive?
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: I already stated 3 times that the comment you are talking about is not Abusive,but it is edited version and the problematic part was removed once i reported it here.How on earth do you think that making such comments repeatedly doesn't mean Abusive?
First off, I responded to Richard who said the edited version was abuse so I'm not sure why you think I was responding to you.
Secondly, as you said, I don't know what the comment was so how can I think it was abusive or not? I suggest posting what the comment was and if it got changed then don't be so sensitive about it. Let it go.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I don't know what the comment was so how can I think it was abusive or not?
You are asking over and over again on many posts about why you should report something as Spam/Abuse? Consider the case,when we spot e.g. baba spam on moderation queue,we report it there so message will be nowhere. It gets deleted right away. Then we report it here,how to answer your question in such cases? There will be nothing to prove he/she was spammer. The thing is, this mechanism works like you have to trust some or the other way. Really. As per as OP is concerned, even one message is visible and i told you that the non abusive message was also abusive one in its previous form.
If you are unable to trust those tons of posts, i kindly request you to ignore them.Because most of the time, members don't have enough time for that discussion. Example is just above this thread.
Richard provided with the links which show past posts and even Chris is agree with the same. Then also you are not able to understand that posting comment "stop f**** comments" is abusive? I mean why?
Look at that account. Its disabled now. Enough people thought such comments as abusive. It IS and WILL BE abusive when it comes to Codeproject.com.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: You are asking over and over again on many posts about why you should report something as Spam/Abuse?
No, I'm not. I see a lot is getting lost in translation. I understand English may not be your native language but I'm done. I don't see one comment or even 2 worth ending someone's account. I also don't see it asking too much for you and anyone else to give a short explanation as to what was abusive. If you have time to post the thread, you also have time to explain why.
Rohan Leuva wrote: Look at that account. Its disabled now. Enough people thought such comments as abusive.
Or, no one looked at it, saw you post it here and just clicked abusive. It can't be hard to give a short description of why you think something is abusive.
You should have flagged the comment as abusive and moved on.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I don't see one comment or even 2 worth ending someone's account
One comment or even 2 worth ending someone's account if it is 1) Abusive 2) It is made on Codeproject.com.
RyanDev wrote: no one looked at it, saw you post it here and just clicked abusive.
Prove it. On which bases you think that is the case? Your statement clearly mean that no one is able to figure out why something gets posted here. They report it just because they saw the post in SA watch. I request you to prove it.
RyanDev wrote: It can't be hard to give a short description of why you think something is abusive
Short? Look at no of messages in this thread. If you don't agree with something even after these many messages and description, i'm sure you won't be satisfied with SHORT one 
RyanDev wrote: You should have flagged the comment as abusive and moved on.
Now you are trolling. I am ending this discussion here.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: Prove it.
The onus is on you. You made the claim that people took the time to make sure your post was valid. Prove it.
Rohan Leuva wrote: If you don't agree with something even after these many messages and description
After all these messages, you still haven't posted the offending comment.
Rohan Leuva wrote: Now you are trolling.
Requesting that you use CP tools is trolling? OK, clearly English must be a challenge for you then.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: The onus is on you. You made the claim that people took the time to make sure your post was valid. Prove it.
Account is disabled. Proven.
RyanDev wrote: After all these messages, you still haven't posted the offending comment.
"Stop f**** doing comments". This is the offending comment.
RyanDev wrote: clearly English must be a challenge for you then
Who cares. 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: Account is disabled. Proven.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hehehe... this time I was faster 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I knew I shouldn't have bothered deleting his posts!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=12022255[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
User link deleted.
Message:Board message, not the article[^] already gone
Nothing to see here. Other users mean it is legitime.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 30-Sep-15 5:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure.
I use the site he linked to as well. And the comment fits the article topic..
|
|
|
|
|
Yes but you have activity and other messages. Just one only login in 10 months give the comment of "look at this tool" and never come back... it is quite different to you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Just one only login in 10 months give the comment
That doesn't mean he is spamming. I'm not sure as message is not accessible. 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
report already edited. I'll request a wipe
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying I've posted a message about that site. Only that I know it. And I don't know how that user should profit from linking to that site.
|
|
|
|
|
Read carefully please. I didn't say you did.
If you would have given the comment, it would have been diferent, because it would have been easier to spot you are posting legitimate content.
In this case, it was smelling to site driving. That is why I reported.
But hey... this is a community. You are conviced it is not, Rohan seems to be on your side, then I delete the content
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I know
I guess it looks spammy if one posts a comment containing a link to an unknown site.
I just commented because I knew that site. If it would have been another site I wouldn't have said anything because I usually don't click on every link posted in a forum.
|
|
|
|
|
@sean-ewington can you please have a look to the user and the message? If you find it legitime as well, please wipe the reports on user's account.
I have already corrected my mistake in initial message
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My instinct says "not legitimate." 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
