|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I would never wear an apricot shirt, so it certainly wasn't me.
I was under the impression it was actually about either Warren Beatty or Mick Jagger; at least that was the gossip at the time (according to much, much older people I have spoken to). 
|
|
|
|
|
That was the rumor at the time, but I think she stated David Geffen a few years ago. I could very easily be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: I thought that song was about me...
Ironically, the song is about him. Go figure.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
... must be the therapist's fees for consulting on narcissism[^].
|
|
|
|
|
...I think I should leave .NET and go start low-level programming, like Assembly. Then I talk to myself, "Am I high enough to think that way?"
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Just do it. Can't hurt to know something extra, can it? It's not as hard as people say.
|
|
|
|
|
He he, I already know Assembly language and I did program a few programs, not apps, in Assembly language. I did some low-level programming, personally I love low-level more than high-level.
But, personally, this post was made by giving up on migraine problem. I have, a lot of migraines, which causes me to be idiot, and post such things.  I have been to a few doctors and they all found none, they all say that they cannot estimate the problem, the symptons are random, yet they provide me with medicines, piriton is one of them. But, I cannot get through. I think I will have to talk to someone even better, with a valid degree of MBBS!  But I have personally found a remedy, I continue to take bath in cold water, I did recently for 30 minutes, but as soon as the effect went off I have been sneezing my soul since then.
I am actually ignoring responding to anything at all, I was 5 seconds away from a reporting a user for being lazy. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all, especially if you take a little processor with a RISC architecture. Many general purpose registers, not a million addressing modes and also not a million versions of each instruction for every addressing mode.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
So...not an ARM then?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No. x86 always has been much more fun.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
What makes you think that? When coding in .net with its rich set of functions do you find yourself thinking; "You know what, I'd rather spend all day re-inventing the wheel" 
|
|
|
|
|
Assembler can be a whole load of fun!
Partly because it's "as close to nature" as you want to get (machine code is a real PITA to code in - I've done it but it's a slog, rather than a joy); and partly because you aren't constrained by the framework.
OK, you don't have Sort, or SubString - but it's a very, very good way to get new hardware working, and sometimes it's still the only way to get the code doing exactly what you want. Particularly when you are interfacing to other hardware and need exact timing. There is a huge endorphin rush when you turn on the power and a LED blinks at the right frequency, or an interrupt is being processed!
And the feeling of "I saved 8 cycles!" in a tight loop...if you haven't done it, you don't know it! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
"I saved 8 cycles" would take 16 wheels to be invented, or 24 if a tricycle. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
A little too rich. And then Mickeysoft says oops and pulls away some libraries from under your feet and you have the great choice between reinventing your own work or rediscovering the trash bin. 
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
No but I do love to contribute more to make the tubes more powerful for that wheel 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: You know what, I'd rather spend all day re-inventing the wheel"
I was thinking the same thing, as I read his post.
|
|
|
|
|
Learning how they invented the wheel was a bad thing?
If so, then you really deserve to give the money you earned to Microsoft! Sorry buddy, no one can save you.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I think you are reading into my comment, waaaaaay to much, buddy, o'pal.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, because you can make a better wheel.
Tuesday Coding Challenge: do a modular multiplication of two ulongs, modulo some ulong, imagine (x * y) % m using BigInteger. You may assume that x < m && y < m && m != 0 because not assuming that just adds some trivial preprocessing and doesn't change the core of the problem.
Go do it in C#. If you don't use BigInteger, I'm sure you already see the trouble coming: you can't even multiply two ulongs in such a way that you get the upper half, so you'd have to split them, and the division is even more annoying.
Or if you use BigInteger as in the example, sure, that works.. but it has to do the same thing internally so it still sucks - you've hidden the suck but that doesn't make it go away. One of the biggest failings of high level languages IMO, you can just sweep the suck under the rug, making it too easy to just ignore it.
Or you could do a longhand binary multiplication so you can sneak in reductions one by one, but that's obviously terrible.
In x64 assembly it's:
mov rax, rcx
mul rdx
div r8
mov rax, rdx
ret
So C# is really annoying here, there's a perfectly fine feature available in the processor to do this easily and somewhat efficiently (128-by-64bit division still sucks, but not as much as when you emulate it), but you can't use it so you're reduced to doing it in dumb and annoying ways.
edit: forgot a mov.
modified 25-Aug-15 15:42pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thankfully I never have to do modular multiplication of two ulongs, so this isn't a problem for me personally. Dang I thank Bill Gates for Guid.TryParse though 
|
|
|
|
|
Assembly is not from scratch. You can call whatever you want. Well, not Guid.TryParse, but GUIDFromString yes.
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: making it too easy to just ignore it.
You mean that there's a slight, nearly neglectible penalty?
Somewhat like a rubber-track that is not quite as efficient as the wheel on the open road? 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I mean there can be an arbitrary penalty that will be hidden under several layers of "I'm hiding an implementation detail and that's a good thing". The user of the top layer will have no idea what's going on and therefore will use anything that's convenient, no matter the cost, it's all invisible. It's all preventable if you want to prevent it, but languages are set up to make people fall into the trap.
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: "Am I high enough to think that way?"
Dunno, how high are you? Rules state that you have to be at least 5' 7" to think about low level programming. Also, you need to weigh at least 12 stone. 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
