|
Should be good now. Maladjusted hostname.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 11-Aug-15 12:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, 2015-08-10 11:27 PDT, the "Latest News" column at the bottom of the CP home page lists five items showing a posting date of "Tue 11 Aug 2015" 
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
Kent's good. I mean: really, really good.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Is he maybe posting from australia?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Could someone please tell me why are images not showing properly in my article and how can I fix them?
Below is a link to my article:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1017396/Running-jobs-sequentially-using-Quartz-Net-with-th
or you can search it in code project by entering "running jobs sequentially using quartz .net"
Thanks & Regards,
Deepak Bisht
|
|
|
|
|
There's a bug, sadly. Apologies. I fixed the images.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
Thanks for fixing them for me. So, is it like every time I will have to ask you for help?
Also, I saw some one posted a comment in my article saying that my download links were not working but I am not able to find that comment anywhere anymore. Can you tell me where can I find it? Is this also a bug?
Thanks & Regards,
Deepak Bisht
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean. Also, one more thing. I saw some one posted a comment in my article saying that my download links was not working but I am not able to find that comment anywhere anymore. Can you tell me where can I find it, so that I can reply to that comment? Is this also a bug?
Thanks & Regards,
Deepak Bisht
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible you posted that comment while the article was in Pending status. After the article goes live the comments get wiped, which is by design because often in Pending articles the comments are about the pre-live version and do not apply to the final article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
Thanks. It makes sense. But one more question related to that. If some one gives a good/bad rating when an article is in pending status, will that get wiped off as well?
Thanks,
Deepak
|
|
|
|
|
You can't vote on Pending articles
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for this info.
Regards,
Deepak
|
|
|
|
|
Impressive response times in this thread! Wow 
|
|
|
|
|
[sound of the wind moving through a desert street]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's been edited by someone - I doubt the OP would add the "no effort" tag!
So the bug is that the editor isn't shown, just the OP (presumably with the edit time)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted, I missed the tag change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now click the "Show Minor Revisions" and you'll see who actually did it.
Why my name is on it at all, I'm not sure - I don't remember editing it (or even reading it!)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: ... you'll see who actually did it.
Why am I not surprised? 
I'm sure Chris asked everyone to avoid "shame-tagging". Maybe it's time for a quiet word...
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Not only that, but I keep deleted the no-effort tag.
Close a question or down-vote it. Don't insult the poster.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just a thought, but if a question is still unanswered after a period (three months? Six? A year?) perhaps we should quietly delete it.
That way, a search via google doesn't come up with a frustrating unanswered question, and rep hunters aren't tempted to answer it for the rep points? It seems unlikely that it's still relevant to the OP after that amount of time (and it'd free up space in your DB).
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
