|
This does exist?
I thought the sheep storys were myths 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that was a baaaaaaad story... ![Sheep | [baah]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif) 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Nah.
Herself wouldn't be seen dead in McVomits.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The Return of Horace (not a hoarse horse)
===========================
Horace Bixby Bridge of Sighs Fits All Quiet on the Western Union Maids All in a Row the Boat ashorace
|
|
|
|
|
SFW
If coding language were an essay..[^]
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one who fails to understand what it means most of the time? I feel stupid every time I read it and can't figure it out, but I can't stop reading the damned thing either. The other site that explains it doesn't really help, since it no longer is funny once explained. A comic shouldn't require the reader to have a &#$&! PhD in nuclear physics to understand it. For instance, WTF is he on about in today's one? (or yesterday's, whichever it is). grumble grumble...
|
|
|
|
|
You are right, it's not funny once it is explained. My answer would confuse you even more, since everything I say is a lie.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
The Driving one was OK, the Bubblegum not so good.
I guess its difficult to be funny everyday, unless you are me. 
|
|
|
|
|
ftfy:
Display Name Taken wrote: I guess its difficult to be smell funny everyday, unless you are me.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
If you flew R/C Helicopters and had as many close scrapes with the ground as I do, you would smell funny too.
Oh wait....
|
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, the T-Rex 550 touched the ground only with its landing gear up to now. The 450 was not quite so lucky after starting to roll without very much control.
What do you fly with?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: The 450 was not quite so lucky
Oh well fix it up and fly again as they say.
CDP1802 wrote: What do you fly with?
Too many flying toys to list here, I basically have one of everything. Also what if the wife is reading. 
|
|
|
|
|
Given my opinions about slavery marriage, I would really be surprised about any female objections. That's why I not only patched up the 450, but also built another one for the scale body I was working on. Five blade rotor heads are really hell to adjust. 
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
That's from something like 'If programming languages were cars' article which was among the news here a while ago. But I find it fitting. A golf cart is just as much a car as JavaScript is a programming language.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Ironically, I like JavaScript a lot. However, I tend to hear a lot of people act like it's the answer to cancer these days and it makes me laugh. Some of the people where are work are comparing to Assembly in terms of speed for instance because of libs like asm.js[^]. And yet, it's still a script. Not sure why people don't get that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I really don't like any functional languages, but that's just my personal preference. I think they are not easy to debug and at some point it always becomes hard to determine, wether or not this mess of code and data in a variable is correct or not.
As an interpreter, it's not only slow, but also notices errors only at runtime. Since the parser can get out of step after a typo, you must not only test whatever you changed, but also everything that comes after it. I really prefer to have a compiler filter out this kind of stuff before anything runs.
And a performance like assembly? Laughable. How can an interpreter which has to parse and interpret every line each time it is encountered ever hope to come close to the native machine code? Such nonsense can only be claimed by people who have never tried or understood what assembly or machine code are all about. Even in the old days some people never really understood the overhead involved with parsing, interpreting and then executing a single line of a higher level language.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: And a performance like assembly? Laughable. How can an interpreter which has to parse and interpret every line each time it is encountered ever hope to come close to the native machine code? Such nonsense can only be claimed by people who have never tried or understood what assembly or machine code are all about. Even in the old days some people never really understood the overhead involved with parsing, interpreting and then executing a single line of a higher level language.
It can't. That's why I laugh at such hyped-up claims. Script kiddies these days.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
During my studies, the professor started the first lecture about assembly programming with claiming that compilers 'nowadays' do a better job than the average assembly programmer. I made a comment about not comparing myself to the average and he thought that I was a bit arrogant. Later we had many interesting talks, after he heard that I had about 18 years experience of machine code and assembly programming at that time.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
You guys don't seem to understand how modern javascript interpreters work.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that must be it. Do you really think they did not try to get their good old BASIC interpreters to perform a little better 35 years ago when memory and CPU were a little more limited than now? Your 'modern´interpreters are just as wasteful and a pain to work with as the old ones and no optimization short of turning them into compilers will make it any better.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Well it's not that he's not funny, it's just that the joke is buried so deep, nobody can find it (or at least, I usually can't)
Bill Watterson was usually funny. I recall that almost every single one was. I wish he had kept on drawing Calvin & Hobbes.
|
|
|
|
|
Today's xkcd requires one to be familiar with this movie, They Live[^]. I found today's drawing quite funny, but that's just my odd sense of humor.
"...JavaScript could teach Dyson how to suck." -- Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
Back in school, we'd call it "The Emperor's New Clothes".
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it to be a reference to Duke Nukem but if it's not i still think its funny 
But in general you are right
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
