|
Why do you want to use ODBC? It's a generic and unoptimized method for getting at databases. Being generic, you lose the performance benefits of using a direct client and you also lose database engine specific functionality.
Member 11762295 wrote: But When I am doing same thing using Oracle client connection then it works fine but since its deprecated, i want to use ODBC.
What is deprecated? ODP.NET? No, it's not.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: What is deprecated?
Microsoft's Oracle client (System.Data.OracleClient) is deprecated:
The types in System.Data.OracleClient are deprecated and will be removed in a future version of the .NET Framework.
As you say, ODP.NET[^] is still supported. It's even available on NuGet:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Microsoft's Oracle client (System.Data.OracleClient) is deprecated:
Wow, that's so deprecated I even forgot it existed! 
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11762295 wrote: But When I am doing same thing using Oracle client connection then it works fine but since its deprecated, i want to use ODBC.
Microsoft's System.Data.OracleClient is deprecated, but as Dave said, ODP.NET[^] is still supported. It's even available on NuGet:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard,
Thanks a lot for guiding me.
Is it possible to share an example of creating table adapter using ODP.net
|
|
|
|
|
I've never used Oracle, so I'm afraid I can't give you any examples.
If you're using the wizard, you apparently still need to install the developer tools[^]. With those installed, I'd hope that it would be fairly straightforward to create a table adapter. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any nuGET package for ODBC?
|
|
|
|
|
No, the ODBC classes ship as part of the .NET Framework.
Why would you want one anyway, since your question says your code doesn't work when you use ODBC? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is several other classesin the application depends upon a web service which uses ODBC connection to connect to DB. so for this table adapter is I create a ODP.Net, either I have to change the webservie code along with all the classes or the option I am considering is re-write the code with DataAdapter instead of tableadapter thereby eliminating this connector issue
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. I created an aplication in C# (Visual Studio 2013) which uses an SQLiteDatabase. To install it on a computer I used Install Shield. But when I run the program and I try to modify some data from database, I receive: "attempt to write in a readonly database", twice. I know I receive that because the user does not have rights to modify that file (database.db) from installation folder but I don't know how to fix this because this app will be installed on other computers and every user should modify the rights for that location folder which is not an option. Any help is welcomed. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Use a better database system?
|
|
|
|
|
Well you think the problem is the database?
|
|
|
|
|
It may be that it isn't suited for your environment, but that's something you'll have to determine.
|
|
|
|
|
What exactly do you mean with "for your environment"? What should I do in that case? I google for an answer, but I didn't find one..I changed the folder destionat and it worked, but I need in "Program Files"..
|
|
|
|
|
DPaul1994 wrote: I need in "Program Files"..
No. That's the wrong place. (If Windows) try the ProgramData or %userdata% directories.
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain "better"
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
"suited for your environment" 
(PIEBALD carefully balances on a fence.)
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the fence, I'd say it is pretty sturdy
The database is not chosen only based on environment; having a server would solve the problem with the file-system rights, but would also be quite a bit overkill if the application is comparable to, say, KeePass.
By the way it reads, it would be data that is accessed by multiple users simultaneous. In that case, SQLite definitely is not suited for the task, as only one person can have a file open for writing at a time.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Simple; put the databasefile in a location where EVERYONE can access it. If the user has no rights, he/she will not be able to modify the file's contents, it's that simple.
As PIEBALD suggested, you could opt for a database-server. Those usually connect over TCP/IP, and have their own authentication - one that is not determined by the file-system.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
When you installed your database, did you by any chance install it into your program directory? You know, the directory that's normally protected so that software can't do malicious things to your system.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been trying all day to figure out why in one of my C# projects in Visual Studio 2013, .NET framework 4.5 I cannot find System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory. I try to add it as a reference but it does appear in Reference Manager. I have been searching all day on how to resolve the issue and I cannot find an answer. I need some help please. I am out of options.
The only thing I can guess is that using System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement replaces System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.
Time is the fire in which we burn.
|
|
|
|
|
Your post appears to be screwed up. You tried to add a reference and the .DLL does NOT show up?
That's because it doesn't exist. On .NET 4.5, the available references are System.DirectoryServices.dll, System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement.dll and System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.dll.
I believe the one you're looking for is System.DirectoryServices.dll. It contains the NAMESPACE System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct. It is screwed up. I was trying to say "does NOT appear in Reference Manager".
I tried adding System.DirectoryServices.dll and the namespace system.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory now appears. Thank you very much.
Time is the fire in which we burn.
|
|
|
|
|
I found the object browser in VisualStudio to be very helpful.
I put System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory in the search bar and get:
namespace System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory
Member of System.DirectoryServices
There are strangers on the Plain, Croaker
|
|
|
|
|
That is exactly what I tried and it did not work. In any case, the issue is resolved so thank you for your help.
Time is the fire in which we burn.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
