|
I spotted this on this post: stored procedure cannot loop an array of string[^]
The post has two tags MySQL, exactly the same, and when I click on the links I saw that they have different IDs.
Can they please be merged?
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted a comment to another post here:
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5075644/Re-Impossible-to-write-a-UserTextFrame.aspx[^]
I added C# tags around the code snippet, but somehow, when it was posted, and unwanted start-pre tag appeared in the middle of the code (which was not in the text), and the end-pre tag was also visible...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I 'fixed' it. It had markdown formatting enabled, so I changed from <pre ...> to ```c# ... ```
modified 16-Jun-15 17:46pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really need to be referred to articles that contain phrases such as "badass motherfucking sorcerer-hacker wizard-god" or "interviews in the Valley have truly gotten f***ing awful"?
I was in the US Coast Guard. We didn't hesitate to use coarse language amongst ourselves. But its use was with other Coast Guardsmen, not the general public.
I doubt strongly that articles containing this language would be published in any reputable publication: in a peer reviewed publication or in a newspaper or in a book. I also doubt that these phrases could be used in a business meeting without reprimand.
I'm in no way a prude. But this use of language was for shock purposes only. It added nothing to the value of the article. As a matter of fact, I stopped reading when I came across the phrases.
I find the Code Project Insider useful in that it presents me with articles that are useful. Mostly, I read for entertainment. Sometimes for their newsworthiness. But if this trend continues, I fear that I will cancel my subscription to the Code Project Insider and read more carefully the BBC articles on Tech and Science.
Gus Gustafson
|
|
|
|
|
We've had a couple of comments about sites that use profanity and we have been trying to choose those sites that are a little less blue. We'll notch up the filter one more step.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you. When I come across a site that uses over-the-top profanity as an attempt at humor, I close the tab.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The newsletter should follow the same standard as the rest of Code Project: Kid Sister Safe.
|
|
|
|
|
Can somebody please roll back my abuse report on this[^] profile? My report was based on this[^], but now that the tip itself got approved, I think the report needs to be removed too.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can it be a change of vote ?
CodeProject keep track of who voted and don't give points again when voting again or changing the vote.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
not sure, seems like a new vote and comment, and the title suggests (to me at least) it's a new one
|
|
|
|
|
There are limits [^] on the number of votes that count towards reputation per day.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
From the screen shoot he provided, he did not reach the day limit.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
like the other person suggested, didn't reach the limit that day (or any other day for that purpose 
|
|
|
|
|
As near as I can see, the voter just created a message with the title "My Vote of 5" without actually voting.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice catch, I didn't pay attention to the wrong icon.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Righty-Oh ... I thought they are autogenerated when you vote ...
never crossed my mind to leave a comment and manually type "my vote of x" as the header ...
So, votes have the general one, and suggestions have the lightbulb ... oh i see ..
Well, cheers for that, mystery solved
|
|
|
|
|
Noctis wrote: Righty-Oh ... I thought they are autogenerated when you vote ...
They do.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
_Noctis_ wrote: I thought they are autogenerated when you vote
Yes, they do, as said Chris.
But One can also forge a message with the same title and icon
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to me like a lot of work to "forge" one 
Unless you start looking at people who try to fake votes for their articles to get rep?
Anyhow, looking at the author page, I doubt it's the case He's been around for eight? years ...
|
|
|
|
|
But all he's done is post 4 messages in that time, and not logged in very often, as his rep points show.
|
|
|
|
|
yep, but i was meaning it's probably a real user, and not a fake account that someone created to upvote his own articles.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
