|
When submitting an article selecting the section "Client side scripting", the subsection "JacaScript" is sometimes available, and sometimes not! Isn't this a bug?
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of adding download links to the body of the article, wouldn't it be better to put the links in the panel on the left side? I see it as an exandable tree item, like so:
Rolled up:
+Downloads
Expanded:
-Downloads
Article Name.HTML
File1.Zip
File2.zip
. . .
File5.zip
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I've been noodling with this and a major problem as I see it is space.
There's not enough space on the left hand side to show article filenames or explanations.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If there's room for one item, it could be "Downloads" which would show a pop-up window with a list of available files related to the article in a checklistbox. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
A UI for something as important as downloads shouldn't be hidden within a popup.
I'm not sure what problem you're trying to solve - what's broken that needs fixing?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm not sure what problem you're trying to solve - what's broken that needs
fixing?
It's not really broken. I was just thinking that if an article-related file is uploaded, the article page itself should support downloading the file instead of putting a link inside the article body (which could accidently get deleted during a subsequent edit). In essence, it should be treated like "Browse Code" is, because code browsing actually uses the uploaded source code. Why does the article's body have to have a link do download the very same file that "Browse Code" already knows about?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Or, you could put it on the right side as the first item...
Or, put related articles on the right side to make room for "Download" on the left (above "Tagged as"), and make "Tagged as" a hoverable item.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
On this article: Converting Text Numbers to Numeric Values[^]
I uploaded the associated ZIP file, butI can't find a link to download it...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John, I added the files to your article. You should be good to go now.
|
|
|
|
|
Did I do something wrong when I submitted the article? They used to be added automatically, and I never gave it a second thought.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
There's a link at the side (above the listed files). If you check the checkboxes of the files you want to attach, and click this link (it says something like "include files in article"), this will include the relevant files.
I seem to remember that the files used to be added automatically but I no longer use the article wizard. I prefer to send my article over whole.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello codeproject-community,
in my company, internet access is only permitted via a proxy server that controls which URLs are allowed to access and which are not.
I'm lucky that codeproject is allowed! 
But every now and then, I come across an interesting article on codeproject that contains images embedded from an external source, which is forbidden by our proxy.
This could make the article quite useless and it requires me to view it on my private PC at home.
So, I kindly ask all the codeproject authors to upload all their images to codeproject, which makes it easier for me (and maybe lots of other readers) to view the articles in their company environment.
It'll also help to keep the articles readable over time as external links may change or break.
Maybe codeproject could also show a warning, if somebody wants to add an "external image" to an article!
Thank you very much!
Max
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not suggesting that this is true in all cases but, where an article has images from another location, this is a pretty good indication that there's some plagiarism going on there (even if it's just the image). We take a very dim view of plagiarised content and look to remove it ASAP. However, there is an exception to this - if an article has been consumed from a blog then the images will still be sourced from the blog.
|
|
|
|
|
According to the guidelines, external images are not allowed and such article should not pass moderation - of course we are all human and make mistakes...
If you find such article you should report it (here[^] probably the best) and the issue will be handled...If it's a sign of wrongdoing - like Pete suggested it will be removed, if not it will be fixed...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted this[^] at the Lounge, but after found out, that it is not only me it may be a legal issue for the hamsters...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a link to this site? When I googled it, it was hard to decide which one it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoah! Okay, definitely not me. Good catch.
|
|
|
|
|
There is one for Chris[^] and one for OG[^] and probably much more...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it is using Google or Twitter handle details to pull data. OG's URL you mentioned changes to his G+ ID while Pete's changes to Twitter.
|
|
|
|
|
It's maybe that OG has no twitter on his CP profile page and Pete does have...I think the hamsters should investigate it in any case...
As I see the site want to trick you into claiming the ownership of that 'account' and start to pay for...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. It seems like that.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
It basically looks like a search engine.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
From what I can see they are a "Content Marketing Solution" (Whatever that means) and you have to pay to be a member. Having the profiles there without consent is a legal issue.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: Having the profiles there without consent is a legal issue.
Possibly. As far as I can tell, it's not very different than Google. It groups all related posts together just like a search engine and links to the CP link.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
