|
If this gets through while all of Baba's posts are fed to the Hamsters, then the filter's fine.
I think that while having a rum-baba, or several, while playing the original Desi Arnaz' rendition of "Babalou" in duet with his young son, Ricky: [^].
I will contemplate the current fearful ascendancy of the evil star Ketu's influence on CodeProject's web-site, hoping that the even more dreadful Rahu is not nearing its antipodal proximity to Earth, signifying an even more sinister misfortune.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Or worse: if Bel-Shamharoth rises, we'll all have to use Octal for the rest of our miserable lives...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Just think in which mess I'd find myself with the nickname containing not one but TWO numbers that are two times four!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No more fermented coconut juice for Bill. He's had enough for one night.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My reputation list shows freshly posted messages as undo of themselves...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. Two posts, one to the Lounge, one to Insider News, led to hamsters-chewing-motherboards page, and then were undone with one point deducted from my rep.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
But the post are actually there (maybe with a little delay, but today all move slow)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I just noticed the posts had re-appeared, except for the previous post to this one which was an update to this thread saying the problem had, evidently, been fixed 
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Approving all you guy's messages..
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Very kind of you...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Update: both messages that failed to post initially have now been posted.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm approving messages as fast as I can! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying that all those messages are got into the spam queue? And you are working hard to clean it up?
I would consider to post more
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - I suspect that it's taking post frequency into account and marking all "frequent posters" as potential spammers.
So the more we post about it, the more it hates us...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
And more work for you! I'm in!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
And i am even able to approve my own messages there
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
modified 16-Feb-15 6:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
You should report that guy! Unbelievable what people post these days!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Look like filters are affected by baba's posts...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
And now, the obvious spam is getting through without any issue.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
modified 16-Feb-15 8:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
It's flagging up a lot of non-spam as potential spam - stuff with no links, no web addresses, no phone numbers and no obvious keywords I can see.
And in a related issue, it's odd to see a post from me in the "potential spam" list: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5002496/Re-Do-you-hate-human-interaction-too.aspx[^] - but even odder to then be allowed to approve my own message...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
If it helps you I can vote you out
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It's got a thing about you: this and your lounge one just came up as well... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
After all that spam detector got smart
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Please send me a copy or link to messages you think shouldn't have been flagged. I may need to adjust the algorithm or the training data.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
There are two in the "messages" list at the moment:
Id Forum Message Replied To Actions
5003383 The Lounge
Re: What the heck does this mean? - Nagy Vilmos
I am guessing he is either:
- talking about building up classes using Ruby's strengths and understanding how to apply duck typing in the best ways, or
- talking out of his arse.
veni bibi saltavi
Msg 5003321 This is perfectly acceptable message. Display the message. This message is Spam. Delete the Message.
5003382 The Lounge
Re: What the heck does this mean? - Nagy Vilmos
I am guessing he is either:
- talking about building up classes using Ruby's strengths and understanding how to apply duck typing in the best ways, or
- talking out of his arse.
veni bibi saltavi
Msg 5003321 Submit Submit
If can work from just the message ids, they would be 5003382 and 5003383 - I'll sort out some more of them for you when I'm at my PC later
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
