|
I don't have a problem with them trying... as long as I can buy a TV without it.
I hope my current TV lasts long, it is the last model before mics and webcams.
Besides... I prefer the remote, at least I have an excuse to search for it under the blankets   
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
bool safeTv = smartTv - networkAccess;
|
|
|
|
|
We have just released the code formatting tool we use to automatically format our code to the prescribed coding guidelines. This tool is based on Roslyn and will work on any C# project. K&R FTW
|
|
|
|
|
It goes without saying that all the engineers at Redmond are putting in long hours to bring you technical previews that have already been released, but there is light at the end of the tunnel for the final build. Just in time for summer holidays
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: but there is light at the end of the tunnel for the final build.
Lord I hope it ain't no train!
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0
My goal in life is to have a psychiatric disorder named after me.
I'm currently unsupervised, I know it freaks me out too but the possibilities are endless.
|
|
|
|
|
... but don't want to buy into the Apple ecosystem then rejoice. You can now write Swift for .NET, Cocoa, Java and Android. This[^] looks pretty interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: You're learning Swift anyways
Who said that?  I am loving C# and always will.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: want to play with Swift
As in Taylor...??? Uh, no... 
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Why not? Internet jokes would seem to suggest that everyone else has (not that I would believe such a scurrilous rumour).
|
|
|
|
|
Well, her latest song did ask us all "wanna play?"
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Why not?
Because:
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: everyone else has
|
|
|
|
|
Did you mean internet jokes, or internet news?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I've been swiftly avoiding it 
This changes things though... 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Google's Miles Ward tells us how Google plans to let its cloud customers run like Google... for less. "'How do you make money doing this?' The answer is simple: Volume."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: 'How do you make money doing this? The answer is simple: Volume private data and personal publicity
FTFY
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
After months of work, a major milestone has been reached for Java’s JDK repository, which now builds warning-free – that’s a whopping several thousand warnings being taken care of. /golfclap
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: hat’s a whopping several thousand warnings being taken care of.
Which, if the developers had taken care of them as they happened, it wouldn't be something to write home about. But noooo....now it's like some sort of "ooh, look at how awesome we are" instead of "you dumb f***s, you should have fixed these in the first place."
And:
the clearing of this technical debt will now eliminate the possibility of bugs hiding inside the flagged code.
Yeah. You know what happens when you touch thousands of places in the code? You introduce bugs.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Which, if the developers had taken care of them as they happened, it wouldn't be something to write home about.
Thank you. That was the feeling I had while I read this, but I couldn't put into words as fine as yours. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: You introduce bugs
Not exactly...Every given peace of code has its built-in bugs waiting to come forward...All you do is smuggle them out...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
"No warning since day one" would be a lot to write home about IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Yeah. You know what happens when you touch thousands of places in the code? You introduce bugs.
Maybe the number of failing unit tests stayed the same so they figured they didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
manchanx wrote: the number of failing unit tests stayed the same
That's the greatest definition of clean code programming I've read upto now.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: the clearing of this technical debt will now eliminate the possibility of bugs hiding inside the flagged code.
And we all know that there's never a bug in code which compiles without warnings, ever. 
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
There's only one warning I haven't been able to resolve in my life...
In VB.NET I had to overwrite a function, so I needed to use Shadows or whatever. It wasn't really allowed because the base class wasn't set up that way. It was a third party library and this was their solution for my problem, so what could I do? In the end I simply edited some config and the warning went away. I believe I looked at C# too, which DID allow it... I still have trouble sleeping at night! 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Except the warnings generally issued to never allow a Java plug-in (or Flash) to run in your browser, of course.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
