Spam and Abuse Watch

[Gone] Big old spam hunt reprise. Part VII - 210 of 468

18-Jan-15 10:30

I think so: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4982393/Spam-Moderation-queue-inconsistent-behaviour.aspx[^]

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

den2k8815-Jan-15 20:41

den2k88

15-Jan-15 20:41

All gone!

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]

spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
spam[^] mer[^]
Spam[^] mer[^]

Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

modified 16-Jan-15 8:24am.

Re: Big old spam hunt reprise. Part VII - 210 of 468

OriginalGriff15-Jan-15 21:37

Re: Big old spam hunt reprise. Part VII - 210 of 468

15-Jan-15 21:37

Spam cleaned. :phew:
Spammers still need kicks.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Nelek15-Jan-15 22:18

15-Jan-15 22:18

5 atm

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

All gone

ZurdoDev16-Jan-15 2:22

ZurdoDev

16-Jan-15 2:22

They are all gone now, I believe.

There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

15-Jan-15 19:25

SoMad

15-Jan-15 19:25

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:45am.

15-Jan-15 21:10

Jochen Arndt

15-Jan-15 21:10

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:44am.

15-Jan-15 21:30

15-Jan-15 21:30

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:44am.

15-Jan-15 21:38

Jochen Arndt

15-Jan-15 21:38

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:44am.

15-Jan-15 21:40

SoMad

15-Jan-15 21:40

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:43am.

15-Jan-15 22:12

15-Jan-15 22:12

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:43am.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

15-Jan-15 22:36

SoMad

15-Jan-15 22:36

Message Removed

modified 16-Jan-15 4:43am.

Another face of baba

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov15-Jan-15 17:09

15-Jan-15 17:09

Here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11378676[^].

This is a post sample.

—SA

Sergey A Kryukov

modified 16-Jan-15 1:13am.

gone

Nelek15-Jan-15 22:20

15-Jan-15 22:20

gone

M.D.V.

Baba's back...

OriginalGriff15-Jan-15 6:02

Plagiarism...from himself...

15-Jan-15 6:02

This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11377871[^]

And this: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11377880[^]

Sigh | :sigh:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

modified 15-Jan-15 12:09pm.

Both Gone

DamithSL15-Jan-15 16:07

DamithSL

15-Jan-15 16:07

Both Gone

OriginalGriff15-Jan-15 5:10

15-Jan-15 5:10

No, really. Honest...
This: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/thinira[^]
Posted this: Telerik Report[^] first as an article then as a tip - it was accecpted as a tip.

Now, it's back in moderation as a new article: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=155845&aid=865540[^] with a slightly different title, and exactly the same content.

He's plagiarising from himself? Or is this just abuse? Dunno...

And now he's trying again to get it as a tip - with the same content as his other tip... I smell a reputation farmer... http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=155990&aid=865540[^]

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

modified 15-Jan-15 11:53am.

Nelek15-Jan-15 8:05

15-Jan-15 8:05

It could be a failed try to improve?

Chill60 has given him / her a warning. I would say, let's see the next move.

M.D.V.

OriginalGriff15-Jan-15 8:16

15-Jan-15 8:16

Afraid not - he had already edited his other tip a couple of times.
And when I warned him when he posted it as an article:

OriginalGriff wrote:

This is the same as your tip.

Exactly the same: Telerik Report[^]
That wasn't an article when you try to get it through as that, and it certainly isn't going to be published as both and article and a tip!

I got the reply:

what kind of modification you expect?

So he knew exactly what he was doing...

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Nelek15-Jan-15 8:31

15-Jan-15 8:31

Then... it is all said

M.D.V.

Brisingr Aerowing15-Jan-15 9:29

Brisingr Aerowing

15-Jan-15 9:29

That's all I can say.

What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

Gone

Mitchell J.16-Jan-15 11:09

Mitchell J.

16-Jan-15 11:09

Gone

QA moderation

Nelek15-Jan-15 2:22