|
|
Well, now that's just gonna confuse the rabbits. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wait 'til you realize what's been going on with Dilbert's tie all along!
(then again, he hasn't worn it since that dress code thing a few months back...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Need you say more?!  
|
|
|
|
|
That's how CP will look like after we remove all the spammers den2k88[^] ( ) throws at us. At the end we will be a few hundred most...
And beware not to say 'hiiiiii' to anyone in your messages
(OT: There is no shorter way to kick them? My fingers are gone, and I have work to do!)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I have 320 more, but I'll wait the first 80 to be kicked - I don't want to clutter up the S&A section! 
I'd really like a faster way to remove spammers account, some of the first truckload I bumped on the site are still there after only 8 kicks.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I was under the impression moderators got a new hammer for that, but maybe @Chris-Maunder has an answer...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
For messages - yes. For accounts, not yet.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
What's wrong with saying "hi," if there is other technically valid content in the message ?
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
I told 'hiiiii' - and it was a joke! It is obvious that the common in the last wave of spams is the 'hiiii' openeing (number of 'i's can be different)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
My niece started to learn CS some 6 weeks ago. I just realized that nothing changed since I left...They still pump an enormous amount of mathematics into students.
I'm aware that, good logical thought is a must-have for CS, and that good mathematics means the same, but even so!
Did you learned that much mathematics as part of your studies? Was it really helpful?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I went off to Uni (many moons ago) to study a BTech in Maths and Computer Science.
At the end of my first year I failed every maths subject (getting zero in one exam, I suspect I didn't even get my own name right) and transferred to a "pure" CS after I re-did the maths exams (at home, no time pressure, all my books and notes. And friends who had passed them handy).
I can say that with the exception of basic geometry the only thing I have needed any significant maths for since is low level graphics drivers (you need trig for arcs, curves, and circles).
So no. It wasn't really handy.
I think it's a hangover to the old, old days: when maths (and Latin) was at the root of all science and scientific thinking. You need some, yes - but nothing too advanced any more. (You need a damn sight more math for physics than for computing these days)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Agree about the physics!
Many, many moons ago when I started Uni I was aiming for a degree in Physics. That lasted until second year.
The day my lecturer put a double integral sign up on the blackboard (I said it was long ago) was the day I knew I would have to find something else... so computing science it was!
|
|
|
|
|
And it gets plenty worse (or better, depending on your view of math) in physics after double integrals.
But then, in CS, there's the C and the S, isn't there - and who would want to miss the S if it puts you effectively in a higher echelon?
|
|
|
|
|
I once had to do nested integration by parts in an Excel spreadsheet.
BNF had an old Frameworks spreadsheet for calculating radiation from waste piles and they not only wanted it brought up-to-date, they wanted to pull dynamically from a database. One radioactive element breaks down to others - the math was seriously hairy. One formula couldn't fit into an Excel cell, so I created VBA functions. I remember one calculation had to be broken into smaller parts and even then I hit the maximum line continuation limit several times. [shudder/]
I'm not sure that my uni math helped much though!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I left the country
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't blame you!
Sounds like a prime candidate for Weird And Wonderful[^] though. Or are you worried that the next poor fool is going to hop on a plane and hunt you down?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have the code anymore (like I was going to keep that!)
I think there were fewer line continuations then (around '95, gawd know which version of Excel), but breaking some of the calculations up made no sense and would have made the code even harder to understand. This was done on site and with the approval of real nuclear physicists (a weird bunch who incidentally knew Terry Pratchett personally!)
You should have seen the original Framework spreadsheets. At least my VBA had comments (some probably started "Sorry"!) and "friendly" function names like dblRadiationFromDaughterProducts.
Sometimes the problem really is that awful, and your choice is to compare various steaming heaps.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm self taught, no college education. But I must say that although I don't specifically implement mathematics in my work, I find myself using math a lot in my mind as I work. Especially with Web projects. Helps to solve a lot of problems, layout issues, etc. It isn't really complicated mathematics, but I can see how they would apply.
djj55: Nice but may have a permission problem
Pete O'Hanlon: He has my permission to run it.
|
|
|
|
|
We had a lot of maths courses (calculus, stats, linear algebra...) and a lot of theoretical CS courses that required a good maths base.
I forgot most of it because I did not have use for them in the jobs I had after uni. but now, it kills me and I need to get back to it if I want to improve my skills.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I did - Computer Engineering in Italy is strongly based on Mathematics.
Yes I used and use it heavily. Processing analogic and digital signals, analyzing mass spectres and densimetries to detect irregularities, optimizing such algorithms through analysis before the implementation... They are all part of my day-to-day job.
Also if I were to program videogames I'd need a thorough competence in trigonometry, while for Operational Research math is needed to understanding and avoiding precision losses and to pre-optimize procedures. Big data research uses algorithms strongly based on statistical correlation, which is a living hell of integrals of each and any order.
Let's not even talk about more scientific fields, where interaction with physics (and so differential equations of any order) is continuous.
IMHO teaching good math in the studies is the best way to go, because you don't limit students to a few career paths - the ones who end up developing Android apps or simple applications may discard any deep mathematical knowledge, while those who feel up to may end up in other fields where math is more important.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
It's simple organizational politics and economics.
FACT: CompSci was developed by Math Department.
FACT: Because CompSci is a Math major, there are minimum requirements to be taught by the Math Department professors.
Supposition: If Math Department loses control of Comp Sci major, math requirements would lessen causing Math Department to lose professors, staff and budget.
Supposition: If Math Department loses professors, staff and budget then the Dean of the Math department would have less prestige and lower pay.
Result: Math Department won't give it up CompSci major and the requirements for taking course in the math department stays high/
That said, many universities have business school programs with emphasis on information systems. The math requirements stop with applied calculus and statistics courses. The question is: Do you want to write compilers or business apps?
cat fud heer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
