|
The C++ past influences a lot its using even for new created projects, and many not C++ developers still thought that this language is very complex. Then it's decided: we must go back in time to fix it!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget your sports almanac
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
He picked up the Farmer's Almanac by mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agree.
I even don't reach the "complexity" adjective, rather the "useless verbosity" first.
A language stick to its features of 30+ years ago...
Just my opinion, though...
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
More specifically than its past, it's the near backward compatibility with 'C' that causes many problems. This has made it very easy for C programmers to move over to C++ compilers and continue to write C-like code. However, in order to jump from procedural-style C to object-oriented C++ requires a huge shift in the way problem solving is approached. Moving towards a Modern C++ approach requires another adaptation.
Compare and contrast this with picking up an entirely new language with a similar syntax like JAVA and C#, or simply an entirely different language. You simply have to adapt and learn how to do things a different way in these different languages.
The past is not an enemy, and especially for a tool, like C++.
Failure to adapt is the enemy for a skilled professional of any type of technology, or field of study where advances are constantly made.
|
|
|
|
|
This article was clearly written by an author whose first language is not English. The grammar errors are glaringly distracting and annoyingly painful. 
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
modified 24-Nov-14 17:25pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Trojan is likely state sponsored, has attacked Russian, Saudi internet providers and telecoms since 2008. "Do you want to know a secret? Do you promise not to tell?"
|
|
|
|
|
I just cleaned a rather nasty one off my wifes Laptop.
It was a Fake AV but it also disabled UAC and replaced the Antivirus Service with its own EXE.
It would not allow me to launch any exe that I tried except MS Paint.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you absolutely sure you hadn't picked up an Etch A Sketch[^] instead of the laptop?
|
|
|
|
|
It would allow me to to do a print screen then paste it in Paint to save the screen shot before the next fake error popped up blocking the screen like UAC does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backup, What's that?
None of my customers knows what that is either.
|
|
|
|
|
Users have filled the company’s ears with literally hundreds of wants, but a few stand out from the crowd. Here’s what the people clamor for. No one asked for a pony?
|
|
|
|
|
I asked for a pony.
Evidently it wasn't high on their priority.
Whatever. 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I asked for a pony but instead I got a mule.
When I raised this as an issue it was closed as "unable to reproduce".
|
|
|
|
|
Are you trying to suffocate me with my own coffee?? 
|
|
|
|
|
What about a one-step removal procedure for all those live tiles and app crap which gets automatically installed and can hardly be disabled on Windows 8?
|
|
|
|
|
The European Parliament is about to call for the “unbundling” of Google’s search business from the rest of its operations, as one potential way to challenge the company’s market dominance. Stop me if you've heard this one before...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strange. Usually the go for the wallet instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Google should just buy the EU. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
This is America.
You really want to try n' dominate a bunch a crazy red necks yet again?
Shesh..
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Google should just buy the EU.
That's not necessary, it would be just a waste of money. Politicians are already only marionettes in the game. They'll just have to threaten them publicly with something like how many people they're going to lay off when they break ranks, and that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
If I were in charge of Google, I'd just pull the plug on the EU for a month.. they can always use Yahoo for search 
How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Clever move. I can see two outcomes:
1) Google pulls the plug: users panic for a week then find alternatives. EU has plausible reasons to build its own Internet resources and increse network isolations other than NSA fluck up;
2) Google backs down and splits: this will actually give way to other (EU) companies to grab some market share, literally paying EU to not isolate more the network.
In the first case we would se a Russification of EU, with more and more services localized (see Vkontakte and Xing compared to Facebook and Linkedin) and less money gained in EU but taxed elsewere.
In the latter Google would show weakness, exploitable for further "requests" from EU whilst reducing its presence in EU market.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
