|
Hello Sean,
I was looking at "Revision 6" to be available for public (the version I added source code to the article).
Thank you,
M.Sreekanth
@_sreekanth_
|
|
|
|
|
I think I did it. How does that look?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
It still looks the same. I'm not sure what could be the reason. I tried it several times.
Just below the "Summary" header at the top of the article,
<h3>Summary</h3> there is a "Process" header with three list items (A, B and C)
<h3>Process</h3>
But in the published article, Process header and the list is missing.
Thank you for your time
Sreekanth
M.Sreekanth
@_sreekanth_
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. I tried applying revision 6 manually. How does that look?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect. You are awesome 
Thank you
M.Sreekanth
@_sreekanth_
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings,
I changed the license on my article and submitted the change for review. Typically the review process is fairly quick, and I'm confused about whether I need to do something; or if the process is just taking longer this time around. Is there any page that I can monitor to check the status of the review process?
My article is entitled "UpgradeDB", and the link to the currently posted version is shown below.
UpgradeDB[^]
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
It was only submitted 4 hours ago; please be patient. The people who review articles are all volunteers and do it in their free time.
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings,
Thanks for the feedback. I had submitted a post on Friday evening (November 7th); and I was concerned that it had somehow fallen off the radar (revision number 14). So I submitted a second post that simply allowed more users to edit the article (revision number 15). Both submissions were essentially equal, and it looks like the second posting went through just fine! 
Thank you Code Project community! I do appreciate everyone's hard work!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to view my articles submitted and one issue I keep encountering is: I deleted an article and started a new one with the same title and other facets. The reason for deleting the original was the article wizard refused to let me delete attachments. Now when I view my article listing it brings me to a page saying it is a draft and I can continue working on it or delete it.
The invalid article waid showing up in my Articles view is: 148214, it should be showing 148218. Both have an aid of 839901.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was wrong at one point,
Since it's been approved the issue went away. Not sure on how to pinpoint the cause or exactly how to replicate the issue.
The waid was incorrect, the aid was identical for both. I'm not familiar with the intricacies of CodeProject's query string so I can't say what that means exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
If you discover it happening again and replicate it, please let me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
I was trying to fix the article Gigabit File uploads Over HTTP - Node.js version and it seems as if I published the article again and it is now appearing in the moderators queue. How should I fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, Thanks a lot. 
|
|
|
|
|
kindly reactivate my account with email : ashish.jindal@grapecity.com
|
|
|
|
|
The article you attempted to repost acted as a kind of advertisement for Wijmo. If you are interested in posting an article like this I would be happy to put you in contact with someone from our Sales Team.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I posted it under Thirdparty solutions and tried to describe a concept that has been ported from .NET to javascript by Wijmo as it would help a lot of Javascript developers.
If it does not satisfy the standards of CodeProject article then you could have closed the article siting this reason instead of de-activating the account.
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone reply and reactivate my account ?
|
|
|
|
|
The CodeProject staff did not close your article and account. This was done by the community who decided that you were abusing the system.
|
|
|
|
|
So, can CodeProject staff reactivate my account ?
And I really don't understand why this community closed the account instead of telling a person that this article does not fulfill the criteria ?
|
|
|
|
|
They can reactivate it.
The community chose to close the account because we are sick and tired of having to fight our way through articles that violate the rules - be it that the article is attempting to sell a service or product, or it's plagiarised, or it's just incredibly badly written. Seriously, was it that hard to figure out that you were trying to advertise your products on this site, and that you should pay for that privilege?
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone please re-activate my account ?
I understand your point but just a suggestion that it would be better if they give a warning before closing the account. If the person repeats again then you can surely close his account.
|
|
|
|
|
That's four times you have repeated that request. If the administrators want to reactivate it they will do so in their own time.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes because I don't want to lose that account.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
