|
Marc Clifton wrote: First, isn't JSON inherently ripe for abuse?
Hum, Is it? Don't think so. It has simple and great spec. http://www.json.org/[^]
Marc Clifton wrote: Second, why are you abusing yourself?
No choice at this time, except working with it.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse wrote: Don't think so. It has simple and great spec.
Simple is good, but what annoys me about JSON is that, unlike XML, you can't publish a schema for it. You're left to the willy-nilly design of the developer and, unless the developer properly documents the JSON format (which seems rare in my experience) you really have no idea what the options are. That said, the same thing is true for XML, except that you CAN create an XSD (and should, in my opinion). Granted, there's some attempts at using JSON to create a JSON schema.
But frankly, chalk up most of my rant to just being old school and liking structures defined, databases with real relationships and normalization, etc.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I see your point. However this doesn't mean you shouldn't comply with the existing spec. Atleast try to make it work with existing spec.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
MongoDB uses BSON rather than JSON. The extensions are to provide support for the richer types you get from BSON rather than JSON.
|
|
|
|
|
According to their document it uses both. http://www.mongodb.com/json-and-bson[^]. Moreover .NET MongoClient library has
collection.FindOne().ToJson() Which isn't presenting good format for my case.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
I have decided to become an Ontology Engineer[^]! 
After all, that is essentially what software development is, isn't it? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
So you're going to become a Visio or some other chart designing tool guru?
Draw the picture and let the rest of us figure out how to make it work.
|
|
|
|
|
There's one word that keeps changing it's definition. Aw, we got a cool-sounding word, we got investors, now how do we put 'em together?
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: There's one word that keeps changing it's definition shifting its paradigm
FTFY 
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: we got investors
I'm still waiting for the investors. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
All you need is an Etch-a-Sketch.
|
|
|
|
|
Obligatory Dilbert[^]
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: All you need is an Etch-a-Sketch.
That is only for professional use... 
There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure. Colin Powell
|
|
|
|
|
I like the title; Chief Ontology Networking man?
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Chief Ontology Networking man?
There you go.
Mike Hankey wrote: Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
 Had not heard that one before. Can't wait to use it!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Chief Ontology Networking man?
Conman?
|
|
|
|
|
I am thinking the same thing ! But I was thinking of selling park tickets outside Bristol Zoo. I heard the income is not bad . 
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
It's only a simple right/left shift...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
and then a branch to the left/right, with your hands on your hips...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Your going into Project Management?
|
|
|
|
|
Pualee wrote: You're
FIFY
Sorry, but its bugging me a lot.
Edit: Seeing your location : You are not allowed to make such mistakes !
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a programmer because everything works as long as I misspell everything consistently.
If I could spell and use proper grammar, I'd be something relatively useless, like a journalist 
|
|
|
|
|
Pualee wrote: Your going into Project Management?
Well, the definition is:
formal representations of a set of concepts within a domain and the relationships between those concepts.
Project management would be anti-ontology non-engineering. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
anti-ontology = pro-ctology ?
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
