|
Just saw this[^] and don't know if it has been posted. Some beautiful pics of breaking waves.
|
|
|
|
|
Guy gets some awesome shots.
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
What's the difference between the England team and a toothpick?
The toothpick has 2 points.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
What does the England football team and a circle have in common?
They both only have one point...
...except for the circle
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote: England team
England English team
FTFY 
#GrammarNazi
.:>GSN<:.
|
|
|
|
|
So, few hours earlier I made this[^] post bragging about my Rep point being a certain prime number and also expressed my joy of being able to hop over as many prime numbers as possible.
A kind hearted gentleman turned my wish into reality by taking the pain and effort to down vote my answers and posts as many as ten and as old as a few years ago. And no, he's not a newbie or a sock puppet account, each of his down vote set me back by -16 points. Being a person with positive thinking, I assume he wanted to give me the joy of experiencing the same prime number again. Thank you gentleman 
|
|
|
|
|
The first rule of Reputation Points is, "don't talk about Reputation Points".
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: don't talk about Reputation Points
"I mentioned them once but I think I got away with it alright."
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 24-Jun-14 20:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Who cares? My reputation here on CP can't be any worse than in "real life".
|
|
|
|
|
Don't take it to hard - it's a ritual. You can find endless cases where someone down-voted answers in a row. Me to had it a few weeks ago. The only one can catch such a 'pure soul' is CP staff, but I think they have other things to do...
So rant here to spill the bad feeling, than really try to enjoy your prime numbers - you deserve it!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Too bad it was gone again the second you posted that 
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect someone is stalking me 
|
|
|
|
|
sir please check it if possible
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/789641/how-to-fetch-image-from-server-in-windows-form-app?arn=7
|
|
|
|
|
sir please check it if possible---
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/789641/how-to-fetch-image-from-server-in-windows-form-app?arn=7
|
|
|
|
|
I'm starting a new project that will be using the latest and greatest stuff from MS. MVC, Web API, ASP.NET Identity ...
I want to test base on the Business Requirements, hence the BDD approach. The step I'm at now, before I write too much code, is selecting the tools to create and execute the tests.
Because the current version of MVC (5) still has a dependency on System.Web, it is easier to drive the browser than mock up the static objects needed to properly test the controllers and views. Plus testing controllers and views is implementation testing not requirement testing.
I have pretty much decided on using SpecFlow for the creation of the test stubs and execution of the tests.
I believe the current practical Browser Automation tools boil down to WaitN, Selenium and MS Code UI Tests.
Does anyone have experience, recommendations or warning on these or other tools that might make my life easier and the product wonderful?
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a big believer in ADD (Attitude Driven Development), it involves a lot of coffee, cussing and confusion!
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
And tilting your chair as far back as it will go
|
|
|
|
|
It's the feeling just before you fall over backwards, "Do I look as stupid as I feel?".
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: in VS2103
Aha!
I've been looking for proof of time-travelers for years. 
|
|
|
|
|
Damn, it was knowledge of time travelers that caused the 'Problem'. I've caused the very thing I was sent back to prevent.
|
|
|
|
|
I used to work with Ranorex for any kind uf UI tests, and I believe their Browser Automation is pretty great, too.
Link[^]
IMHO getting a trial copy and just have a look at it is worth the time.
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|
|
Saw this headline in the newspaper today, "US vs Portugal ESPNs highest rated non-football game"
I'm in the (can you guess the country?) but still it struck me as amusing, considering all the WC banter on this site.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say the US as a whole is into sports and rather patriotic... you combine both and you get a great ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
While you're correct of course, I was refering to their use of the term 'non-football'. I would imagine that in most if not all other parts of the world that headline would be considered an egregious mistake.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
