|
Hi,
trinh.nguyen wrote: But I still wonder this: If there is no "=" operator defined for that class, what will be implemented for "=" operator? Binary copy?
If you do not write an assignment operator for your class the compiler will generate a default assignment operator that performs a memberwise copy[^] of base classes and members.
Have a look at section 12.8 paragraph 15:
www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3690.pdf[^]
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I want to make a USB write blocker with c++ to work for linux. I have been looking for open source USB write blockers, but I just found few for windows that disable the writing functionality from the registry. The idea is to prevent the OS from changing the USB devices timestamps while plugging the device for cloning or analysis the data.
I need help in figure out the best way to do it.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Override ::
MSVC > Class View > Properties > Override >
OnKillActive , OnSetActive
/*Dialog ( in sheet page ) */
virtual BOOL OnKillActive();
virtual BOOL OnSetActive();
/*exit page*/
BOOL CMyPropertyPage1::OnKillActive()
{
TRACE(_T("OnKillActive\n"));
return CMFCPropertyPage::OnKillActive();
}
/* entrance page*/
BOOL CMyPropertyPage1::OnSetActive()
{
TRACE(_T("OnSetActive\n"));
return CMFCPropertyPage::OnSetActive();
}
Visual C
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a specific question, or are you just posting random code? 
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I am confused with screen/window/client coordinate in windows programming.
As I understand, 3 coordinates are like the following:
screen top left point: spoint(Xs,Ys);
window top left point: wpoint(Xw,Yw);
client top left point: cpoint(Xc,Yc);
so the related position for 3 points are:
spoint -----------
| wpoint----------
| |
| cpoint ----------
|
|
GetWindowRect(&rect) gets wpoint;
ScreenToClient(&rect) gets which point? if it gets cpoint,then
cpoint (x,y) based on wpoint, or spoint?
And in a dialog template:
CONTROL "",IDC_STATIC_TST,"Static",SS_BLACKFRAME,80,83,118,35
80,83,118,35 based on client top left point?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
It's all relative, my dear Watson.
econy wrote: ScreenToClient(&rect) gets which point?
ScreenToClient will convert a screet RECT (your 'spoint') coordinates to be relative to client RECT (your 'cpoint'). In your example the top and left will be negative coordinates relative to the client top/left.
Window Coordinate System[^]
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I am new to c++ and I have an assignment to write a program to compute the Average daily solar energy collectable from January 1st to December 31st per square meter (kWh/m^2/day) using a 2-axis tracking collector in Albuquerque, can any one help me with this
|
|
|
|
|
Well... get started and ask specific questions. I think you'll get more fruitful responses that way. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Albert
I will attached more specific information
|
|
|
|
|
Its very simple, from an IT perspective. Your hardware, whatever it is that measures radiation, plugs into your serial/USB port, your app opens that, and takes readings on a periodic basis, collates them, and averages them.
The problem is how you distinguish solar radiation at the surface from back radiation from GH gasses. (assuming you will be measuring at the surface and not TOA).
|
|
|
|
|
i have a library, which i can not modify. this library is called from a console app, and as part of its processing, this library dumps a large and variable amount of debug/trace info to stdout. i'd like to be able to read what the library is sending to stdout from the calling code, in order to extract certain pieces of info for analysis. basically, i want to capture some of what the library prints during a call, save that info away until the call completes, then re-print the info in a better format. this would help me from having to search the hundreds of lines of output to find the particular bits i need.
(this is Windows, C++)
is such a thing possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
i need to do this within the calling app, not from the shell.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you need this for trouble-shooting or all the time? ...because it sounded like you just needed for troubleshooting, in which case... why not use the shell options?
..but otherwise, you can always try reassigning the stream using freopen[^].
Here's an actual example...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/58667[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: Do you need this for trouble-shooting or all the time
all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, try out the freopen option... hopefully that gets the job done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey out there,
i'm heared that the use of timers in large projects is bad for performace.
So is this true?
I'm wondering, because i have done a new control using VC++/MFC and i use one timer in there.
The timer only is created and the first time it's called i terminate it.
Now someone said to me that i sould use ::GetTickCount() instead and save the first value and compare it again and again.
It look more performance hungry than my timer solution.
So what's your oppinion?
Please don't answer something like i should do a test, i haven't so much time to test such things.
And please answer only real facts and not only stuff like "i like timers more because i like it more" or "i like the TickCount solution more".
Hope for a good discussion 
|
|
|
|
|
I think it largely depends on specific circumstances... for example, I've used timers to update fields that change at extremely high-rates. Under those circumstances, timers were actually a HUGE improvement on an old system that updated UI fields as often as new data was available.
So my opinion is... use what works for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Using anything in an inappropriate way may be bad for performance. Using it correctly shouldn't.
Your question isn't so much about timers being bad in general, but about the proper use of one. The size of the application has nothing got to do with it at all.
As for our opinion: it's impossile to tell if you're not more specific. It's ironic how you're asking for specific answers, yet fail to offer the minimal information required to answer the question properly. There are plenty of timer interfaces that you might use, you didn't specify yours.
As for GetTickCount, that is a bad way to measure performance since it only checks the system time, not the time your application uses: if other applications are running at the same time and slowing the whole system down, you'll get much higher values! If your purpose is to measure program performance, a more suitable function to use would be clock()[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan_Lang wrote: Using anything in an inappropriate way may be bad for performance. Using it correctly shouldn't.
I like that... 
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like too.
Using it correctly, the timer has a good performance.
Sometimes, GetTickCount is a good solution, but it wastes too many cpu time to do this.
On the other hand, Timer provide a good way to let you know when times out, and you can do anything in the period.
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about? Timers do not have bad performance! Timers don't waste CPU! All they do is read some hardware register. We're talking nanoseconds here!
Keep in mind that almost all timer functions can measure at a resolution of only about 20-50ms at best, even though the unit typically used for the result value is in ms. Calling them more often then 100 times a second is therefore utterly pointless and stupid. Calling them less often will not result in any performance loss that you are able to measure!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)