|
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=744114&av=1103684&msg=4785717#xx4785717xx[^]
Hey Guys you are strict with Plagiarised, I am new and I understood, I removed all contents from article .
I had removed article contents from MS site but only Name of the classs which are used in the article is given with the appropriate link. Also I mentioned in re-posted article that Compression/Encryption/Zip contents are taken from Microsoft site.
I am confused what is missing when I followed all your suggestion ?
I am sorry I am login with other account to connect with you because my that account is deactivate. Now next is what to do ? How should I re-post my article ?
Or this is End no chance given to clarify, or modify contents ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: very poor article I didn't see any 'article' there
However I don't think it's a span - it maybe written not on caffeine but on something stronger...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with KEP on this one... Let the member live.
Edit: I removed the spam-ish sentence and put it back into the queue, but as a Reference.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
Fine by me if the member lives - I just wanted second opinions on spam / rubbish... Rubbish it is then!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
It's not rubbish per se, to me it is fine as reference with the Coffee-link removed.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
I would disagree - there is almost nothing in there! If he wants to write a document on Singletons, then he needs to explain a lot more background, I think. That is just an example, with hardly anything supporting it.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: That is just an example, with hardly anything supporting it.
Which makes it a Reference.
From the submission page: A Reference article is a short (typically 1 page) article used to lookup common information such as tables (eg. ASCII tables, HTTP codes etc) or function or class explanations. Typically there will be few if any images, and no downloadable code (though both are possible if the author wishes)
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
Which would make References just "Tips Lite" - anything at all could get in there! The way I read that is that references are just that: common information, small snippets that are badly explained on MSDN for example. The singleton pattern is well explained elsewhere, but in terms of pages, not lines!
Not sure about this...but shall we agree to disagree, rather than get into an argument?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I see the ASCII code mentioned as example... Which is probably even better documented as the Singleton Pattern (or equally, at least). But okay, I agree on disagreeing with you.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post gone. Member needs one more kick.
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
This spammer was already posted by Jas. And as I've seen it, the spammer was reported 11 times, but he's still alive!
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
kArViD0tnEt wrote: This spammer was already posted by Jas. Saw that just after posting.
kArViD0tnEt wrote: And as I've seen it, the spammer was reported 11 times, but he's still alive! Turns out the spam report threshold was increased recently.
Also, the account is gone now.
What is this talk of release? I do not release software. My software escapes leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. I see. Thanks. Seems I have been out for so long.
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Chris doubled the amount of reports to close account so innocents don't get ban by chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Seen it. Thanks.
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
|
This person flooded the Q&A forum with massive postings:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10684279[^],
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/Donnie-Brownhotmailcom[^].
At the moment of writing, this member got 8 abuse reports on his account, all posts were removed, I saw 3 (three) last ones.
This is the copy of one of those posts:
Donnie-Brown wrote:
Question:
You use a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database.
You want to create a table to store Microsoft Word documents. You need to ensure that the documents must only be accessible via Transact-SQL queries. Which Transact-SQL statement should you use?
A. CREATE TABLE DocumentStore AS FileTable
B. CREATE TABLE DocumentStore([Id] [uniqueidentifier] ROWGUIDCOL NOT NULL UNIQUE,[Document] VARBINARY(MAX) FILESTREAM NULL)GO
C. CREATE TABLE DocumentStore([Id] [INT] NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,[Document] VARBINARY(MAX) NULL)GO
D. CREATE TABLE DocumentStore([Id] hierarchyid,[Document] NVARCHAR NOT NULL);GO
Answer: C
Question:
You develop a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 server database that supports an application. The application contains a table that has the following definition: CREATE TABLE Inventory(ItemID int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, ItemsInStore int NOT NULL, ItemsInWarehouse int NOT NULL) You need to create a computed column that returns the sum total of the ItemsInStore and ItemsInWarehouse values for each row. Which Transact-SQL statement should you use?
A. ALTER TABLE InventoryADD TotalItems AS SUM(ItemsInStore, ItemsInWarehouse)
B. ALTER TABLE InventoryADD TotalItems = ItemsInStore + ItemsInWarehouse
C. ALTER TABLE InventoryADD TotalItems AS ItemsInStore + ItemsInWarehouse
D. ALTER TABLE InventoryADD ItemsInStore + ItemsInWarehouse = TotalItems
Answer: D
...
This looks pretty bad. I hope we will agree that we don't want such things.
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 24-Mar-14 2:24am.
|
|
|
|