Spam and Abuse Watch

ramol85515-Mar-14 0:03

ramol855

15-Mar-14 0:03

I could justify, if you are atleast eager to listen...
When anybody is providing all the references then atleast it's not stealing,that i did..
I accepted and corrected my mistakes...rest its all up to you guys...

Tom Marvolo Riddle15-Mar-14 0:20

15-Mar-14 0:20

>ramol85 Wrote:
When anybody is providing all the references then atleast it's not stealing,that i did..

Please read(point no 21):
Code Project Article FAQ[^].

ramol85 Wrote:
I accepted and corrected my mistakes...

That's what we need.

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

ramol85515-Mar-14 1:35

ramol855

15-Mar-14 1:35

Thanks! Jas24 (for FAQ).
It was really what was required by me.Should have read it earlier Frown | :(

Thanks again....

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 23:56

14-Mar-14 23:56

ramol85 wrote:
for all the intention was to share a good content

It would be harsh and barbaric, yes - but that wasn't what you did.
You copied someones elses work, and posted it deliberately ticking the box which says "I have read and agree..." And part of those conditions are that you originated or own own the rights to the material you are publishing.

You were then told "this is plagiarised"
You edited it, made trivial changes, and published it again.
Then you were reported here, and the process of removal began.

Then you edited it, removed the content, replaced it with a link to the original, and tried to publish it again.

That isn't "accidental" or even "ignorant" plagiarism. It's deliberate, it's uncaring, and it's plain wrong by any measure you want to use. And this isn't the first time, is it? How many times have you been banned since you first joined, back in July 2009?

So you aren't "a beginner" - you have definitely been here long enough to know the rules...

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

Wendelius15-Mar-14 1:51

Wendelius

15-Mar-14 1:51

ramol85 wrote:

I would request again,for future warn once and let people correct their mistakes..

You were warned at least three times if I counted correctly but instead of removing the article from the queue, you tried to get it through as a tip.

I like to believe that you have learned the lesson and won't try to post plagiarized material. So, as far as I'm concerned, it would be nice to keep your account alive and have you here. But as long as you play by the rules.

Plagiarised would be Tip

Tom Marvolo Riddle14-Mar-14 20:37

Re: Plagiarised would be Tip

14-Mar-14 20:37

This :
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=117854&aid=744447[^]

From this:
http://www.diffen.com/difference/GET_%28HTTP%29_vs_POST_%28HTTP%29[^]

Member:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10671614[^]

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 21:42

Re: Plagiarised would be Tip (reposted by the plagiarist)

14-Mar-14 21:42

He's edited it - changed nothing - and posted it back to the queue. Sigh | :sigh:

Weirdly, it's an alternative, but for a "tip" that has already been deleted... D'Oh! | :doh:

The Force not strong in this one is, I feel.

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 23:17

Re: Plagiarised would be Tip (reposted by the plagiarist)

14-Mar-14 23:17

It's back: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=117864&aid=744447[^]
And this time it's just a link to where he copied it from...let's kick this idiot back to bed!

ramol85514-Mar-14 23:34

ramol855

14-Mar-14 23:34

I Respect your thinking not your action. Sigh | :sigh:

anyways the article was closed..but the link could been useful as an alternative to the one already in Codeproject

Re: Plagiarised would be Tip (reposted by the plagiarist)

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 23:48

Re: Plagiarised would be Tip (reposted by the plagiarist)

14-Mar-14 23:48

Doesn't matter.
If you had written a mobile app, and I saw it, copied it, called it "Flappy Bird", posted it to Google Play and the App Store as my own work, and was pulling down $50,000 per day in advertising revenue then you would (quite rightfully) be very pissed off at me.

How is that different from you going "CTRL+A, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, 'yes, I wrote this' - Tick, 'Publish' - Click"?
It took minutes to steal what probably took someone a week or more to produce. Is that fair? Honest? To be allowed?

Or (if you had written the original) would you be (quite rightfully) very pissed off with Code Project for permitting it?

Tom Marvolo Riddle14-Mar-14 23:41

14-Mar-14 23:41

Kick given Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

Abuse?

CHill6014-Mar-14 3:47

CHill60

14-Mar-14 3:47

This member http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Profiles.aspx[^] includes a link to their site "JobPencil" in all of their solutions http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/MemberPosts.aspx?tab=answers&mid=10573017[^] - presumably because they don't have enough rep to include the link in their signature.
It actually rings a bell from a few months ago, so I'm guessing they're back after being booted.
Your judgement call, I'm still considering mine

Re: Abuse?

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 5:03

14-Mar-14 5:03

That was disconcerting...Click on a spammer link and get myself... Laugh | :laugh:

Did you mean to link to this user: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10573017[^]
Rather than the Who's Who list? Laugh | :laugh:

But yes, his recent stuff is spam, so it and he need a kicking.

Re: Abuse?

CHill6014-Mar-14 7:14

CHill60

14-Mar-14 7:14

How strange! Not sure what I did there Blush | :O

... but it *is* a Friday afternoon

Re: Abuse?

OriginalGriff14-Mar-14 7:24

14-Mar-14 7:24

No problem - he's all gone now!

Pathetic spammer

SoMad13-Mar-14 23:26

SoMad

13-Mar-14 23:26

Pretty big fail on the first post (no actual spam link). I don't think there is a reason to let him practice his 'skill'.
Member: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10669316[^]
Messages: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Messages.aspx?fmid=10669316[^]

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

Re: Pathetic spammer

OriginalGriff13-Mar-14 23:47

13-Mar-14 23:47

Pathetically departed.

Spam would be article

Tom Marvolo Riddle13-Mar-14 20:15

13-Mar-14 20:15

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=117761&aid=744006[^]

Member:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10669161[^]

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

Plagiarised would be tip

Tom Marvolo Riddle13-Mar-14 18:30

Re: Plagiarised would be tip

13-Mar-14 18:30

This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=117741&aid=743898[^]

From this:
http://www.diffen.com/difference/GET_%28HTTP%29_vs_POST_%28HTTP%29[^]

Member:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=6468952[^]

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

Mitchell J.13-Mar-14 19:14

Mitchell J.

13-Mar-14 19:14

Tip is closed, member still here.
He's been here 4 years and 7 months...

Re: Plagiarised would be tip

Tom Marvolo Riddle13-Mar-14 19:28

Wants help to hide from antivirus and malware detectors...

13-Mar-14 19:28

CarefulCoder Wrote:
He's been here 4 years and 7 months...

But he's still a culprit.

Please see Griff's view regarding this
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4717851/Re-Plagiarised-Tip.aspx[^]

To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright

OriginalGriff13-Mar-14 10:17

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=117713&aid=743786[^]

13-Mar-14 10:17

This: How do I encrypt a RAT?[^]
From this: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10668371[^]

What do you think?

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter13-Mar-14 6:57

Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

13-Mar-14 6:57

I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)

Re: What do you think?

Richard Deeming13-Mar-14 7:16

Richard Deeming

13-Mar-14 7:16

Argh, my eyes!

I'm torn between "Format / layout issues" and "Extremely poor quality". On the grounds that fixing the format wouldn't improve the quality, I've gone for the latter.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

New troll

OriginalGriff13-Mar-14 0:35