|
You are right. And I don't get it why it is in the 3rd party section.
|
|
|
|
|
So the point you've made is particularly useless?
Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
Finally: Yes.
In the 3rd party section there are no tips. So the articles may be shorter there. Therefore, I answered you. But after reading the complete article I had to change my mind on the article type.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems more like an incomplete blog entry. I did my dance of the dead and it is gone now.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't ask for a killing strike, I asked for a re-classification!
Whatever, I am sure you know what's appropriate.
Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
I just thought that it should be interesting to show some statistics on QA home page, like
1. Number of active questions
2. Number of answered question
2.1 Number of accepted answers
3. Number of unanswered questions
4. Average time a question answered
5. Average time between answer and acceptance
...and may more...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
What for? I don't see any benefit from it.
By the way... you already have the registers:
Unanswered
Active
New
Top Rated
Popular
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It maybe help to remove all the homework questions...
If someone will see that getting answers is 2 days and 3 hours in average - he will not post his homework question of tomorrow  .
I was not really in for some benefit, I just thought it could be nice - that may give some kind of satisfaction for those too didn't make the top experts list ever...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: It maybe help to remove all the homework questions...If someone will see that getting answers is 2 days and 3 hours in average - he will not post his homework question of tomorrow
You are supposing a lot...
If they did a little search they would not need to post that questions. 95% of homework questions are already solved in the net, the users are just dammed lazy.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: that may give some kind of satisfaction for those too didn't make the top experts list ever...
Ehhhmmmm... how? and... what for? 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Heck man! The lazy buggers don't read the instructions on the same page suggesting they google first. What chance do we have that they would read statistics? 
Most of the real idiots seem to post up the homework as quick as possible so they can get down the bar and drinking without delay. Which IIRC is the main purpose of going to university... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Female hunting" was a fruitless exercise at my Uni - there were about four ladies per 200 rampant stallions on course, and the local ladies all knew what students were like and wouldn't touch us with a ten-foot cattleprod!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Things definitivelly changed... and I don't explain more because I don't want to break the kid sister rule 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Recently i posted my question about "How to bind datasource to Treeview in c#" but got reported by 3 people and didn't have a chance to ellaborate or explain. Please provide an option before closing the question to let the asker improve the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Already we proposed a suggestion[^] on this topic, hopefully that's in their Todo list 
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
Regrettably, there are some trigger-happy morons in QA who assume any question they don't immediately understand in detail is "not a question" and who reach for the 1-vote and "abuse" buttons as the first , last and only option.
Not a lot anyone can do it seems... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Agent_Spock wrote: Please provide an option before closing the question to let the asker improve the question
How does this work for spam or malicious postings then? We certainly can't sit back and wait for the spammer to respond.
|
|
|
|
|
sir, it is not necessarily that the user is a spammer like i had a question which was reported for "Incomplete" but i didn't have the chance to correct it as the question was closed. If we can get an option that after the question is being reported 3 times within 24 hours the person can improve his question.
|
|
|
|
|
If I open a link after a search query IE 11 crashes and prompts to close/debug.
The same search and reopen the link then works (with a JS error).
Anybody else see this?
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying this is the fault of Code Project?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I am not blaming CodeProject. I'm not that type of guy.
Just thought it strange that opening a CodeProject article crashes the browser - a strange behavior and so wondered if it's just me.
It is more likely an IE 11 bug as a web page should not bring a browser down.
Thanks,
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
The only reason I ask is that this forum is for bugs relating to Code Project itself.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand. Can you delete/move this thread?
Thanks,
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
If an article in in the moderation queue for an update, you can read existing comments on the published version. If one of those comments is spam (as this is: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4750819/http-pharmacieplus-pk-SEO.aspx[^]) you can't report it because the red flag isn't visible unless you follow the link to the already published article first.
Not important, just a little confusing!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
