|
Richard Deeming wrote: Wait, so a 19-year-old is trying to buy an X-Box for his 4-year-old son, and it
turns out he's not particularly intelligent?
 Imagine that.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Who spends $734 on ANY game console?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a PS2, my brother in-law gave it to us when he bought a new one. And we have a Wii that we bought used for $100 and it came with a bunch of games and a Wii fit board.
As of now they are both collecting dust.
I'm one of those guys that waits a year to buy games when I can buy them for $15 instead of $50 - $60.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: I'm one of those guys that waits a year to buy games when I can buy them for $15 instead of $50 - $60.
I'm in that club too. It's what SteamPowered sales are for. I decide what I'm willing to pay for a game and then twiddle my thumbs until I can buy it at that price (or at least on major sale--I'm not paying $59 for a game. Amazon often has nice discounts on relatively new games. Just bought two for my kids for 30% off one, 25% off the other.)
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting that he's buying that for his 4-year old son who must have been born when he was 15. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Gramma's probably 34 and great Gramma is 49.
Yeah, buying it for the 4 year old, like me buying a Telecaster for my duaghter when she was 4, I don't understand, she just can't figure it out. I guess I'll just have to play it myself and she can watch...
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I bought a Telecaster last month (first electric). I got home, and my 7 year old (who bought a stratocaster knock off with his own money serval months before that) immediately starts playing it and says "Daddy, I want a telecaster too".
So, in my case, I could buy a $700 tube amplifier and claim it is for my son 
Edit:
Saw your profile, beautiful Les Paul... so, can you recommend me a good amp? Looking at VHT Special 6. Maybe VHT Classic 18 (as I see it on criagslist locally for cheap).
|
|
|
|
|
The Les Pual is pretty at a distance but she's been played and the wear and tear is real "Road Worn".
For an amp it depends on what kind of sound your looking for, The VHT's will probably be just fine. The reviews tend to be favorable. For a tele, if you want that "spanky" tele sound there's no beating a Fender amp. You can probably pick up a Fender Champ XD combo or mini stack for the same price as the VHT. The Champ XD is a tube amp that has effects built in for extra sounds.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Let me hang on to that Tele until she grows up. Promise to give it back to ya. No, really. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Um, Ok, I'll need a deposit first, if you could just give me your account number and password I'll just take out what I need. 
Did I mention I will be sending a picture of my her Tele?
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: Did I mention I will be sending a picture of my her Tele?
Perfect. I'll give you my account details as soon as my Nigerian buddy returns my card. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: my Nigerian buddy
Imagine that! I know a Prince from Nigeria who's having financial issues and needs to transfer all his money into my account.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: Did I mention I will be sending a picture of my her Tele?
Since we have members from across the pond: Tele[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Was it a picture of the gold-plated one? 
|
|
|
|
|
No, that was extra. 
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
In the past it was item really cheap, postage really really expensive that use to get those who didn't read properly.
EBay don't let this happen anymore now.
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations to Peter Jackson who has managed to unseat Francis Ford Coppola.
I'd actually stopped looking for bad movie to book adaptations, so it was a refreshing surprise to see that, yes, it is possible to c**k up a book more than Francis Ford Coppola's retarded offering Bram Stoker's Dracula(1).
I'm assuming Coppola is Jackson's mentor because I should think it would take years of training at the hands of a professional in order to learn how to suck every clever and imaginative thing out of a book and substitute in pure camp. You could have randomly sprinkled in scenes from Indiana Jones and the movie wouldn't have made less sense.
I know that after reading The Hobbit I was left with several unanswered questions about the backstory. For example, I'd always wondered what would happen if there were a love triangle composed of two elves and a dwarf - the book isn't the place to find the answer to that question, you have to see the movie because the book says nothing about it. Nothing.
In the book Biblo does several clever and funny things - none of these things make it into the movie. I was especially disappointed with Mirkwood as it seemed to rely entirely on a scary set without actually creating a mood. I've seen scary scenes in the woods without the need for such an over-wrought set - it makes me wonder if they picked most of it up at a Harry Potter fire sale. The whole thing was a total mess.
I've no interest in seeing the 3rd film.
I'll have to re-read the book to cleanse my imagination.
NOTES
------------------------------------------------------------------
1: Francis wouldn't have been the champ had his movie been a mere vampire film; however, he actually used Bram Stoker's name in the title of the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
As soon as I heard that he was spreading this over three films, I knew that it would suck mightier than a street sweeper.
|
|
|
|
|
The movie called The Hobbit, but it doesn't made on top of the book called The Hobbit. Peter Jackson made a prequel to the Lord of the Rings based on all the background story written by Tolkien.
My only problem is that there is nothing in it from the funny, childish things written in The Hobbit...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
I really enjoyed the LOTR movies*, but I have avoided both Hobbit movies so far.
* Particularly because Tom Bombadill (  ) is absent. Also because we get to see those self-righteous elves get slaughtered.
|
|
|
|
|
I hadn't read the book in many a year but saw the first part the other day and also thought it sucked and thought I should go back and read the book again because a lot of it didn't look at all familiar. I won't be watching the rest of it me thinks!
|
|
|
|
|
I had mixed feelings with the first movie too. Yet it's a matter of perspective. Peter Jackson is telling the story not only from Bilbo's View, but from his story telling. "There and back again" is in fact the book Bilbo has written himself over the years. So the movie is trying to convey what Bilbo has experienced. (Not only "facts" but also his feelings etc.)
I noted this best when the mountain giants clashed together. Only then did I realize: This is not just a reenactment of some story, but it's how Bilbo had felt and is telling his story after his journey.
Considering that: I have to say the film was nice enough for a Tolkien fan like me  And I'm going to see the 2nd part today
|
|
|
|
|
I think the main problem with me not liking it was that I didn't think that the character that played Bilbo was very good. He doesn't become the character like the character that played in LOTRs. He just didn't make it beleivable...if that makes any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Got the first movie as a present, now I do not follow movies in general so was upset to find the movie end in the middle of the story. I gave up on movies matching books so thought the first movie was not too bad. However, I do not think I will be seeing the second and third as it was not that good!
|
|
|
|
|
poor little you.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
