|
Evidently psychographic profiling indicates that a person posting exactly that phrase is more likely to commit heinous crimes so we had to put the filter in. Obviously you've found a devious way to get around it...
|
|
|
|
|
There may be a mole in the hamster farm, time to start looking for the hamster working for the NSA.
|
|
|
|
|
OK who flagged this as spam/abusive. Seriously?
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a solution is deleted the points are not removed (user gets to keep the points for answering the question), not sure if that is by design or an oversight...
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Beyer wrote: not sure if that is by design or an oversight...
Good question. When I posted my first answers, then after removing an answer, the points were nullified. But then, there came an update in November 2012, that changed the voting system of the message boards for example, and after this update, removing answers doesn't nullify points anymore (but I don't know whether it is a bug or by design).
+5!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to use this code in my article:
<pre lang="cs">void Number()
{
<div style="font-size: small;"> int la0, la1;
bool dot = false;
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 == '.') {
Skip();
dot = true;
}
MatchRange('0', '9');
for (;;) {
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 >= '0' && la0 <= '9')
Skip();
else
break;
}</div>
<strong>la0 = LA0;
if (la0 == '.') {
if (!dot) {
la1 = LA(1);
if (la1 >= '0' && la1 <= '9') {
Skip();
Skip();
for (;;) {
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 >= '0' && la0 <= '9')
Skip();
else
break;
}
}
}
}</strong>
}
It seems that something in CodeProject tries to encode the HTML (not what I wanted), but also inside the <strong> element, something weird happens. Maybe it happens in comment boxes too, so I'll demonstrate:
void Number()
{
<div style="font-size: small;"> int la0, la1;
bool dot = false;
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 == '.') {
Skip();
dot = true;
}
MatchRange('0', '9');
for (;;) {
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 >= '0' && la0 <= '9')
Skip();
else
break;
}</div>
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 == '.') {
if (!dot) {
la1 = LA(1);
if (la1 >= '0' && la1 <= '9') {
Skip();
Skip();
for (;;) {
la0 = LA0;
if (la0 >= '0' && la0 <= '9')
Skip();
else
break;
}
}
}
}
}
Yup, the glitch is happening in the comment preview too. Hint: this text is not bold.
|
|
|
|
|
What does that mean by
Qwertie wrote: <pre lang="cs">
i think it because there is not any pre-define format for "cs" is available.
Check it and go through it.
Warm Regards
bjdestiny
"Affordable solutions for all your creativity needs."
|
|
|
|
|
It is not in the popup list, but it is valid
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the author edits the article then the approval count gets reset to zero and the article goes back on the pending queue.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. I just had a look at Revisions tab and i am not able to see the Article version that is in moderation queue. Am i missing some thing?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Try to display the minor revisions, too.
Veni, vidi, caecus
|
|
|
|
|
They are currently only at 2 and 3 reports respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. I think they came again in moderation queue just after i pressed Approval. The confusion was there because i saw 5 reports after that[Snapshot].
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting this error frequently when I open non-deleted questions in Q/A section. Don't know why?
Browser - IE7
Server - Web04
|
|
|
|
|
If page loads more than a normal time,then this will happen. I also faced similar situation.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
What adding a new question the tags were not properly added, I submit and ask me to fix the tags and when tag is fixed and resubmit the question the below error appear and page redirected to here.[^]
Error:
There was an internal error creating the item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snehasish_Nandy wrote: being a professional doing such stuffs really pathetic.
pathetic? We are open to down vote anything which seems incomplete or inappropriate.You can down vote any content over here if you feel its not appropriate etc. e.g. route planning algorithm[^]
I would have downvoted this one,but i didn't. Some of your answers were down voted by me with reports. You have habit of copying the title of the question and paste it into google,then posting links to that as answer. Go through your own answers list and you will feel it. All the times,its not necessary that OP failed to find the answer through google.
Well,after these many times being banned,don't you still understand that you can not make money out of the reputation points? Well,many members(including you) know what i am talking about.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...rohan...so you mean to say down voting is the solution..
and then again i don't have problem in down voting until an unless it's genuine and the person down voting have the courage to state the reason in the comment box.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
