|
That's like a peon in life paying $0.017 cents in "recompense" for crushing someone's car on purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
Yet another reason NOT to use Google.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
How much does the NSA cost?
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Extensible, mutable, and rapidly evolving thanks to open source roots, the Web browser reigns as a platform for users, developers alike. Write once, run everywhere (after a few polyfills. And some hacks. And lots of swearing. And maybe a few tweaks.)
|
|
|
|
|
<rant>
On point (1), fair enough. Although I still prefer Outlook to any Web mail app, but evidently I'm perverse.
Points (2) and (4) list features enabled by browser-specific extensions, then in (5) he still claims "multiplatform". You CAN have your cake and eat it.
For point (3) he really doesn't seem to understand "Open Source", or the fact that copying from an existing page may actually break copyright law. OK to look at for learning, not OK to copy, unless explicitly permitted.
Point (6) "A clean abstraction layer" had me spluttering my coffee over the monitor. If that's a "clean" abstraction, then I'm a banana. Conceptually it started off clean(ish), but its become muddied.
Point (7) - is he seriously saying that JS has come with a better library system than any other. It doesn't f****ng have a module system (yet)!!!
Point (8) seems to ignore the fragmentation caused by targeting features specific to one browser.
Point (9) again fails to mention that this is all not supported yet across all browsers.
And for point (10): (i) Node.JS is not run in the browser, so is irrelevant, but with regard to the callback mechanism (apparently invented by JavaScript):
f = function (a) { "What could go", function (b) { "With a callback based", function (c) { "architecture" }, function (3) {"anyway"}}};
While the ideas of coroutines and continuations have existed since I was born!! That's progress, largely in the wrong direction, but progress.
</rant>
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Android, iOS and Blackberry top Dice's list of top search terms used by hiring managers at the tech job posting site. All of them
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: All of them
Especially Blackberry...
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch. That hurt 
/sniff
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Last year in November, we released an out-of-band customer technology preview (CTP) of the Visual C++ compiler. It contained preview versions of C++11 features which we subsequently fully released in Visual Studio 2012. At that time, and at GoingNative 2013 this year, we promised to keep releasing these CTPs to show our progress towards full C++11 and C++14 standards conformance. And a little sumtin-sumtin for the native folk as well
|
|
|
|
|
...instead of just a CTP, with the real meat and potatoes coming in VS-next (2014)
I seem to recall STL explaining how last year's CTP couldn't be integrated into VS2012 (past a CTP) due to some drastic changes to the standard library implementation. Hopefully we're not being teased yet again with what's going to come in another full price release of VS.
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by STL's comments in the thread beneath, I wouldn't count on it.
OTOH, with Visual Studio Express the "full price" now is rather low!
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd bite, but VSE doesn't allow you to use 3rd party extensions. VAX and Atomineer are a big deal to me.
|
|
|
|
|
We have released ASP.NET and Web Tools 2013.1 for Visual Studio 2012. This release brings a ton of great improvements, and include some fantastic enhancements to ASP.NET MVC 5, Web API 2, Scaffolding and Entity Framework to users of Visual Studio 2012 and Visual Studio 2012 Express for Web. More toys for your Web playtime
|
|
|
|
|
If Vikings were here today, the sounding of a distinctive horn in York would have created chaos.
The ancient instrument, blown last night, signalled exactly 100 days until the end of the world, according to Norse mythology. It's in the Daily Mail, so you know it's 100% accurate
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like an advertising campaign for a certain NZ TV show[^]! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
OK, maybe I'm a sucker for the concept, but is the show any good?
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
and can they count.. (the blurb in the link mentions 4 brothers, the illustration shows 5)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
No, there are only four brothers. The other guy on the picture is their grandfather, whose powers include not ageing as fast as everyone else.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It's better than some of the other shyte that's on at the moment. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Apple won a round in its seemingly never-ending legal battles with Samsung today, making it more likely that Apple will be able to deny Samsung the ability to import some of its smartphone models into the U.S. You know, maybe getting a company that builds phones to be the main supplier for your phone wasn't a good idea?
|
|
|
|
|
meh
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Let assume that Samsung DID stole that code from Apple. How can it be a base for band Samsung's phone.
Apple states that, that specific piece of software gave the advantage to Samsung over Apple. BUT! Apple has the exact same software!!!
I can understand how the court can fine Samsung for using stolen code and make him pay a lot of money to the lawyers (yes, and Apple can be happy to get some out of it), but on what base can ban Samsung's products? That Apple was unable to advertise it's software?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
If there's no crisis or big project to work on, CEOs may wonder what IT does all day. Here's how to make sure your contributions aren't undervalued. Go ahead, shut down the servers for a while, make yourself noticed!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: shut down the servers for a while, make yourself noticed
or write every detail you do in work and report your work in a timely manner.
|
|
|
|
|
Tarek Elqusi wrote: or write every detail you do in work and report your work in a timely manner.
Ffft, like they'll actually read any of that. 
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
