|
Link fixed, thanks.
Google CEO, Erich Schmidt: "I keep asking for a product called Serendipity. This product would have access to everything ever written or recorded, know everything the user ever worked on and saved to his or her personal hard drive, and know a whole lot about the user's tastes, friends and predilections." 2004, USA Today interview
|
|
|
|
|
It is, in my opinion, a co-incidence - The member who has posted the answer has posted over 200 answers[^] and can be seen as respectable Q&A answerer - In addition, the article he is linking to is not written by him - It is written by another CP member!
Replying to questions with links to codeproject articles is not that uncommon (in fact, I have caught myself doing this a few times, too). I think that the answer has the same title as the article is rather a proof of the lack of the questioner's Google / Search skills than anything else.
After all, I think you caught up a false-positive, and you can edit your OP the way that no one is gonna harm the Answerer, Questioner and Article author.
And then I heard it like a shot through my skull to my brain,
I felt my fingertips tingle and it started to rain,
When the walls of my bedroom were tremblin' around me,
This ramshackle voice over attack of a bluebeat,
And tellin' me she's only looking for fun.
And this was the sound of the very last gang in town.
I'da called you Woody, Joe
|
|
|
|
|
"After all, I think you caught up a false-positive, and you can edit your OP the way that no one is gonna harm the Answerer, Questioner and Article author."
Excuse me, I'm not caught-up in anything: I clearly posted what I observe as a rather remarkable co-incidence, and I have not explicitly accused anyone of anything.
I find the fact that the unedited title of a QA question matches, character by character, the title of a 2009 CP article very interesting. And the very quick posting of the reply, and its being accepted, and upvoted: interesting.
Respond to the information presented, and spare me your negative fantasies.
Google CEO, Erich Schmidt: "I keep asking for a product called Serendipity. This product would have access to everything ever written or recorded, know everything the user ever worked on and saved to his or her personal hard drive, and know a whole lot about the user's tastes, friends and predilections." 2004, USA Today interview
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I clearly posted what I observe as a rather remarkable co-incidence, and I have not explicitly accused anyone of anything.
You did implicitly, by posting your OP in the Sapm & Abuse Watch.
BillWoodruff wrote: I find the fact that the unedited title of a QA question matches, character by character, the title of a 2009 CP article very interesting. And the very quick posting of the reply, and its being accepted, and upvoted: interesting.
Nevertheless, even if it is interesting: It doesn't proof anything - Since you posted this in the Spam and Abuse watch I think you are referring to an abusive behavior, for which there is no proof.
BillWoodruff wrote: negative fantasies.
That is what I guess you are having here.
And then I heard it like a shot through my skull to my brain,
I felt my fingertips tingle and it started to rain,
When the walls of my bedroom were tremblin' around me,
This ramshackle voice over attack of a bluebeat,
And tellin' me she's only looking for fun.
And this was the sound of the very last gang in town.
I'da called you Woody, Joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rohan,
What I find most interesting is the question: what do you think the chances are of a newcomer to CodeProject asking a question on QA, asking for basic help with a GridView in ASP.NET, the title of which matches exactly, character by character (for 72 characters), the title of a 2009 CP article ? There's no indication the question has been edited by anyone, or revised by the OP.
That a QA question is answered quickly with a link to a CP article by one of our google-copy-paste instant rep-bloating experts here is no surprise whatsoever, and that's not necessarily a bad thing.
It is the combination of the question's title perfect match with the article title, followed by the quick response which links to the same 2009 CP article, and the quick acceptance of the answer that, taken together, suggest there is a possibility here of something not quite right.
It is interesting to note that right now I can load your CP profile, and mine, but I cannot load the profile of either the OP for this question, or the profile of the person who responded. I don't know what to make of that.
bill
Google CEO, Erich Schmidt: "I keep asking for a product called Serendipity. This product would have access to everything ever written or recorded, know everything the user ever worked on and saved to his or her personal hard drive, and know a whole lot about the user's tastes, friends and predilections." 2004, USA Today interview
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I cannot load the profile of either the OP for this question, or the profile of the person who responded. I don't know what to make of that.
I do. The nuke happy brigade have been in town.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, this was clearly a case of some thing which was not usual. Due to the fact that we have such a wonderful group of experts here at CP, both the accounts have been closed.
BillWoodruff wrote: google-copy-paste instant rep-bloating experts
I am solely agree with you because i found many answers by him which didn't need a link. Just a single correction can make things work,than also he posted links through Google.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages[^]
Idgit[^]
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ban hammer had struck! 
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baboom.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message[^]
Idgit[^]
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
