|
binoyvijayan wrote: I had also know the words to call u, that you used.
Some explanation would be nice; which word was offensive?
binoyvijayan wrote: So I don't want your help.
It'd be inefficient to ask if someone wants help if they post a question; I usually assume that people who post a question are looking for help.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry its my mistake ... Sorry once again....
|
|
|
|
|
No harm done, glad it's just a mistake 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The coreadudio.dll working fine in visual studio 4.0 but I can't work with visual studio 3.5. My client is using visual studio 2008. so if there is any chance to do it in 2008 .. please give the solution..
if any download link that capable of working in 2008 ,please give me
|
|
|
|
|
HAve you checked the dependencies of the dll? Parhaps its using .NET 4.0?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes . Thats what the prpblem, it s version is 4.0. thats why its working in visual studio 3.5.
I got the solution for my doubts. I got a coreaudio as an application in visual studio 2008, So now my application working properly..
Thanks for your reply
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Guys!!
I have a panel, and i have a textbox that i can move to where i want. When i try to move outside the panel, in the top or the left of the panel, the control stops, it means, its locked to move for these directions... Buuuuut, for right or bottom, the mouse leaves the panel and the control remains invisible because its outside the panels borders..
What i want is a way to lock the left and bottom, to move the contro only inside the panel...
thanks in advance!
Rafael
|
|
|
|
|
You need to set the Cursor's Clip Rectangle in the MouseDown EventHandler for the TextBox to that of its container's ClientRectangle translated to Screen coordinates, using an offset based on the Height and Width of the TextBox:
Cursor.Clip = YourTextBox.Parent.RectangleToScreen
(
new Rectangle
(
e.X,
e.Y,
YourTextBox.Parent.ClientSize.Width - YourTextBox.Width,
YourTextBox.Parent.ClientSize.Height - YourTextBox.Height
)
);And, in the MouseUp EventHandler for the TextBox:
Cursor.Clip = Rectangle.Empty; If the Control that contains the TextBox is never resized at run-time, then, of course, you can store its ClientRectangle translated to Screen coordinates in advance. If the TextBox is always the same size, you can pre-calculate the offset Rectangle only once, and then, in the MouseDown EventHandler, just set the Location depending on the MouseDown's MouseEventArgs.Location.
This may not seem intuitive .
Google CEO, Erich Schmidt: "I keep asking for a product called Serendipity. This product would have access to everything ever written or recorded, know everything the user ever worked on and saved to his or her personal hard drive, and know a whole lot about the user's tastes, friends and predilections." 2004, USA Today interview
modified 13-Oct-13 1:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
You're the man Bill!!!! Works perfectly!!! Thanks you so much!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how to export dataGridView to Image(.jpg) format?
|
|
|
|
|
The same way as any other control: DrawToBitmap[^], then save the bitmap as jpg, though you should probably save it as png instead, text and other high-contrast-tiny-feature things get mangled pretty badly by jpg.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much for your reply. It is working absolutely fine for me.
Now i want to take every 5 rows from data grid and capture it as a separate image. Can you please suggest me anything for this?
For ex. If grid contains 20 records then i want to take 4 images containing five records each.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what a good way to do that is. One slightly hacky way would be to make a new control (not on the form, but a temporary object), copy those 5 rows over, and then draw that. At least, I think that works.. I haven't tried it.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to tranfer a print job of printqueue A to printqueue B,try the PrintQueue.AddJob(), but fail, who know how to resolve it,Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of variants of the AddJob method[^]. Which did you use and what exactly was the result?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
What is the best way to store *MASSIVE* amounts of data? I'm thinking [EDITED] millions or billions of images totalling 10TB or so. Not sure of the exact size yet... need to get some data samples... but somewhere in that arena.
I guess at a high level, they could be split by state.
I know that SQL can not handle this kind of size.
Performant lookup is also desired.
How is this usually handled?
Needs to be backupable of course as well.
Had an old boss who was a big fan of storing the path in the DB and the files on disk. From personal experience, you end up with so many directories, the file system breaks down. Try navigating to a folder with 1000+ directories.
I don't think I'll need to do too complex of queries on the data, just simple look ups. Inserts should be fast as well.
-- modified 10-Oct-13 23:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Never mind the DB you choose, how will you connect that many hard drives to one machine?! 
Have you looked at these guys MongoDB[^]?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
modified 10-Oct-13 22:46pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm... you're right haha... my estimates were a bit over the top. I did the math just now, and thats like 95,000 TB... lol...
I think 10TB - 100TB total data is more in the right area... oops
|
|
|
|
|
That sort of volume is going to required some serious iron. I would suggest you need to look at Oracle, I loathe Oracle but SQL server struggles with serious volume. We were looking at record volume about the same but data size substantially smaller and I think the 3 server cost topped $1m for the Oracle licences.
Then you are going to want to hire an Oracle consultant/DBA to design and tune the blasted thing.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
As I responded to the other guy, I got a little over zealous with my estimates... 10TB to 100TB is probably closer.
|
|
|
|
|
If the number of records is over 100m then you are going to struggle with SQL Server, even when you go down the path suggested by Garth - that is really your only option anyway. There is no way you want the images anywhere near your searchable data.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
ok, there's the images, and then there's the 'meta data', or think of the index fields telling you how to locate an image ..
So, to locate the correct image or pointer to image, you need the metadata - this is what you search on .. the question is, do you really need to store the images WITH the meta/index data ? I'd suggest 'not' .. so, you have a searchable DB of metadata/indexes on fast tier 1 storage, then, once the right record is round, you then retrieve the image from maybe a worm drive, or 'tier 2 storage' using the pointer/location from the search.
Plenty of storage providers provide WORM storage for example
|
|
|
|
|
|
SledgeHammer01 wrote: Performant lookup is also desired.
You need actual requirements - not off the cuff statements.
For example you could take the above statement and claim that the the system must be capable of serving all of that data at the very same time. If so then the company is going to need to buy an IP backbone company just to deliver it.
The reality is that system has business cases that dictate usage. You need to start with those.
SledgeHammer01 wrote: Needs to be backupable of course as well.
Think about that in terms of the above requirements. How long is it going to take to restore the entire system from scratch? Obviously too long some something has to be different.
SledgeHammer01 wrote: I guess at a high level, they could be split by state.
You start with requirements, business cases and usage patterns and then define categorizations. Categorizations will impact how it is stored.
One final suggestion - if that estimate is a pie in the sky dream then go do your own research. If it is a hard business requirement then the business needs to pay for consultants (very likely plural) with experience in very large data systems rather than trying to roll their own.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
