|
You're right of course. I cannot remember how much of the site non-registered people can actually see.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found the root cause.
Base on Pete O'Hanlon's idea in [AppInnovation Entry - Problem in publishing], we must remove all Boilerplate text to avoid this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've updated my article, but it didn't appeared in the Latest Updates. I thought the (U) meant updated. Or does it require some number of votes, or popularity, or something? I'm puzzled  . Can someone explain me this mysterious inner workings of the Code Project? 
regards,
Kate
Wisdom is to see the things as they really are.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you are talking about this: A Complex - Yet Quite Intelligible - Pathfinding in C#[^]
I saw it in the moderation queue Friday afternoon (US Pacific time). It does look like something is wrong since the "Updated date" on the article page currently says 18 Aug, 2013.
CodeProject was down for a few minutes Friday afternoon, so perhaps the hamsters got confused.
Looking at the revision history[^], the "Updated date" should say 24 Aug, 2013.
Hopefully this will alert the CodeProject staff to take a look at it and make sure the posted article has all the latest updates.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
OK, thank you for the prompt answer. That might explain it.
regards,
Kate
Wisdom is to see the things as they really are.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kate,
Could be a few things, first let's rule out some stuff.
First, did the update stick? Everything look OK?
Second, what date was the update on?
Third, how much did you update? Did you leave the "mark as updated" box checked?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
> First, did the update stick? Everything look OK?
It looks OK, so I guess it did.
> Second, what date was the update on?
23-Aug-13 20:21 - my update
24-Aug-13 1:00 - editor later corrected the grammatical errors (thanks again Deeksha  )
> Third, how much did you update?
I did update the sources (download file), and quite a lot of article (1/3 or 1/4). Here: Difference between version 3 and 4 [^]
regards,
Kate
Wisdom is to see the things as they really are.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have written an article: Fast Postback and Model Binding, under asp.net section.
But my article didn't appear in the weekly mailer on the next week.
Could you please let me know what went wrong with my article?
Article link: Fast Postback and Model Binding
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Anurag,
Thanks very much for your query. In order to keep our newsletter lean, we have set a requirement of three minimum votes on an article before it appears in the newsletter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Does it mean that after 3 votes, it will appear in the Newsletter?
Or an article needs 3 votes during the first week of submission only?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes and yes. For "new" articles an article only has the first week to get those 3 votes. After the first week is over it will not be considered for the "new" section of the upcoming newsletter. However, if you were to update it and it had 3 votes it would be considered for the "updated articles" section of the newsletter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
recently I added my blog feed and the first article got pulled fine. Now when I added more posts none of them are getting consumed.
Now, I've added the CodeProject link to the bottom of every post but still it's not working.
On my blog feed though I can't seem to see this tag: http://nikola-breznjak.com/blog/feed/[^]
Do you maybe have some suggestions what should I try to do?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nikola,
Thanks very much for your query. I believe the length of your blog entries is the reason here. In order for our aggregator to pull, an entry must be at least 1000 words long.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm. Your RSS link in our feed looks good. You rel tag looks good. I think code counts for words.
Hmmm.
Would you consider changing your feed description to include the entire post? I suspect your previous entry that pulled was not set up like this, but please humour me, I'm superstitious.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
You are totally correct. First time I posted my first post I had the posts set up in a way that they were showing full content (not excerpts). After that I changed it to only show excerpts, and posted two additional posts. Then, when I saw that the codeproject wasn't pulling in my blog feed I changed the posts settings back to the full content, but that didn't help so I was lost.
Currently posts are set to show full content, thereby the feed shows the full content of all posts.
Hope this helps now.
Thanks,
Nikola
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot submit my article because images of my article are not getting uploaded.Please help
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be happy to help. But if this is your article, were you eventually successful?
Learn About Places (LAP)[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I have been trying to publish this article for AppInnovation. But everytime that I click on Publish it gives an error: "The content is either too short or default". The article looks fine when I Preview it. The article ID is: 640977
This error is thrown even though the lenght of the article is substantial. Any suggestions as to what should I do?
|
|
|
|
|
Could you provide a clickable link to the article so that I can take a look at it?
|
|
|
|
|
It's still in drafts. Can I still send a link?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you can. As an editor, I can take a look at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean is currently editing it. He should be able to sort it (including fixing the missing images in the draft).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
