|
if you have nothing to help. GET LOST! i dont need your comment
|
|
|
|
|
I've been active around here for 10 years.
The way you worded your question makes it seem like you want someone to write your code for you and supply you with exactly what would be required for a homework assignment.
The quality of the question directly dictates the quality of the answers you get.
|
|
|
|
|
Using the MD5 class is not that hard. There is even a sample in the MSDN documentation. Have a look here: MD5 Class[^].
Try to do this assignment on your own. You'll probably find that it really isn't all that hard to do.
Regards,
— Manfred
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
thanks though. i just figured it out at last! ^_^ . It's just my first time to encounter such kind of program 
|
|
|
|
|
paulpro109 wrote: must have an actual and expected output embedded in the program
What? As soon as you embed the hash value of a previous calculation, you change the program. And consequently, the hash value is no more the same.
|
|
|
|
|
What exactly did you mean by writing: "The program must have an actual and expected output embedded in the program." ?
You'll have to explain that a bit more.
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
their should be actual and expected output in the program. no need to input. btw nevermind. i just figured it out at last
|
|
|
|
|
Currently I have one table in the table with the column data type is Image, in addition to his success on the market, but when the GridControl and XtraReport is not displayed, you send your watch to help you with your Project. Thanks you very much.
I write on visual 2010, sql 2008, DevExpress 11.1.7
Link source:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/dt46y4k1w0021dd
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends. I have a database and people send some info into this db. But sending time is totally random. So now i check this db every 20 seconds and refresh my program according to new data. But as my user count increases, i need a more efficient approach. I mean how can my program know that somebody added something new into db.
|
|
|
|
|
Informing each client of each change in the database is a known anti-pattern; not only does it generate quite some traffic, it also moves the problem of concurrent edits to the UI.
leone wrote: i need a more efficient approach
Add a table that holds the "last" datetime that you "modified" your tables. Would consist of two columns; datetime and the name of the table that's changed.
Have the client query that table to see if there are any changes. Means fetching data from a table, and the last modification-datetime for that table 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Can someone help me with this.
I see the following error and I dont understand the reason behind this issue.
I browsed through different sites but I didnt get an appropriate answer for this
ERROR :
System.UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The format of the URI could not be determined.
at System.Uri.CreateThis(String uri, Boolean dontEscape, UriKind uriKind)
at SonarEngine.T.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)Engine Path = "*********"
|
|
|
|
|
You get this exception for any of the reasons listed in the appropriate exceptions item here[^]. If you showed us what your Uri looked like, we could help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's a whole mess of code to wade through. If you put breakpoints in place and step through your code (or look at the stack trace when the exception is thrown) you should get a better idea of which bit is breaking.
|
|
|
|
|
I have issues in hitting the debug points as well.
The main code is a webservice call where the webservice is a vb.net code and it is being invoked by a java application.
When I set the debug point on T_PAGELOAD and invoke the webservice, it doesnt even hit the breakpoint and I get the response of the webservice call.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay - put some logging in your code, and use try/catch blocks to see if you can narrow down the area that's causing the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I'm playing around with threading at the moment (self-directed learning) and what I would like to do is bounce balls around in a windows each with a thread of their own. I know this might not be the BEST way to do this, I want to do it purely for the learning.
My idea is that I'll have a ball object that will be updated by a timer Event. At regular intervals, on a separate thread, I'll get the positions off all my balls and Draw them to the window. I will probably attempt to get some collision detection between balls going eventually but for now, they'll just bounce if they hit the sides/top of the window.
Anyway, what I really would like to do is have the balls move around with fairly good physics. ie. gravity. But, my maths although good is inappropriate (I did maths & statistics at A level for my current career in biology). So, what equations can I use to give me x and y coordinates when I plug in an increasing value for time(t)? I realise I'll need to check if for x+radius>=rightWallX and x-radius<=leftWallX etc. it's just the movement in the presence of gravity I need.
Can anyone help me out with the maths? I did try google but I think I'm failing to provide the 'right' search terms to find what I want.
|
|
|
|
|
I would use two integer properties for the ball object, called DeltaX and DeltaY. These would represent the number of pixels for the ball to move along the X and Y axis. A good starting point would probably be 3 as a value for both of these variables. When DeltaX is positive, the ball is moving to the right; and when negative, the ball is moving to the left. When DeltaY is positive, the ball is moving down; and when negative, the ball is moving up. When you encounter the edge of the form, simply multiply the appropriate variable by -1 to change its direction.
Something like this:
private bool BallHitBoundary(Ball ball)
{
if (ball.Top <= ClientRectangle.Top || ball.Bottom >= ClientRectangle.Bottom)
{
ball.ReverseDeltaY();
return true;
}
if (ball.Left <= ClientRectangle.Left || ball.Right >= ClientRectangle.Right)
{
ball.ReverseDeltaX();
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
and the ReverseDeltaY() and ReverseDeltaX() are methods for the ball object that simply multiply DeltaY/DeltaX by -1:
/// <summary>
/// Reverses DeltaX by multiplying by -1.
/// </summary>
internal void ReverseDeltaX()
{
DeltaX *= -1;
}
/// <summary>
/// Reverses DeltaY by multiplying by -1.
/// </summary>
internal void ReverseDeltaY()
{
DeltaY *= -1;
}
The above is actual code from a project I built to make a Breakout game just for the fun of it. The ball object inherits from a Panel object with a solid circle drawn inside of it. It works good for me.
-NP
Never underestimate the creativity of the end-user.
|
|
|
|
|
So you didn't attempt to model gravity in the motion of your ball?
Effectively your ball was in outer space? 
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose that's one way to look at it. Or in this case, gravity is pulling along the Z-axis keeping the balls on the playing field, like a pool table. 
If you want gravity to pull down on the Y-axis (towards the bottom of the form), I'm sure that could be incorporated by changing the value of the DeltaY property, but the math is beyond me too. Sorry.
-NP
Never underestimate the creativity of the end-user.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I might have found my own answers here actually. I'll have a play around and see what I come up with. But you were on the right track with what you said. Modify the DeltaY by adding a constant gravity component each iteration.
I guess I could also add a 'friction' component acting in the -Y and -X directions each iteration to have the ball slow due to air resistance too. Hmmm! This could be a fun experiment...
|
|
|
|
|
It seems at a first glance that it can only bounce once in one timestep, but it can in fact bounce multiple times in succession in one timestep. If you take any shortcuts there, balls can "escape", usually through the corners, and it will be uncommon enough that it could go undetected essentially forever (you can use that to decide that it's really OK, or that it's a very nasty bug, but it's good to be aware of it). If the speeds of the balls are reasonably low and the timestep is reasonably short, balls can still bounce twice, in the corners.
Also, the simple implementation of bouncing actually bounces off of a virtual surface some distance outside the box depending on how far the ball traveled outside in a step. A more correct way to implement it is calculating the intersection of the box with the half-line in the direction that the ball is traveling, then bouncing "some time in the past when it was at that position" (flipping a speed and, crucially, updating the balls position by mirroring it around the line it bounced into*), then looping until the ball is inside the box. Like the other problem, this effect gets worse and worse for higher speeds and longer time steps.
So yes, it's actually pretty complicated.
* that is why you calculate the intersection point - to get the line it first bounced into. There would otherwise be an ambiguity when the ball is in the "outside quadrant" of a corner.
modified 8-Jul-13 12:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As Harold mentioned you have to make a computation strategy for collisions e.g. ball vs ball and ball vs frame. Here are some terms that you can google.
You can go the variable time step way - good for getting the simulation right.
You can go fixed time step - good for having the simulation go fast.
One computation strategy could be as follows until no more collisions occur in a time step:
- within a time step calculate the next collision
- calculate the physics for involved objects
Collision checking is a discipline in itself - a moving ball within a time step can be looked at as a sweeping volume being a capsule. Collision checking results in a collision time within a time step and a set of contact points.
The physics can be as complicated as you want to. You can keep it very simple by sticking with kinematics (position, velocity) added some impulse calculation or go very exotic by adding lots of dynamics (gravity, friction, spin, energy loss, etc.).
About gravity:
If gravity is g (9.82[m/s^2]) downwards and you have a time step of deltaTime [s], all balls need to have their velocity changed by
velocity change due to gravity: deltaVg = deltaTime * g
In any case, have fun
Kind Regards,
Keld Ølykke
|
|
|
|
|
We are using a web service(asmx) to communicate with service provider.
Problem: We are getting a web exception while sending and receiving response.
Exception Details :
1) Exception Message : The request was aborted: The operation has timed out.
2) Exception Status : timeout
We are getting this timeout status within 40 seconds whereas we have set webrequests timeout property to 180 seconds.
Can anybody please suggest me the solution of this problem??
Vishal
|
|
|
|
|
vishalmudrale wrote: We are getting this timeout status within 40 seconds whereas we have set webrequests timeout property to 180 seconds.
Can you verify that it's the WebRequest that's actually timing out? Can you post the entire exception?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
