|
Some time I received email and some time I did not receive email and when the email received with password that password did not work for log on to codeproject.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see an option readily available and can't therefore confirm my e-mail account.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
You should have received an email from us when you signed up. Otherwise try this page[^]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In Quick Answers, I usually scroll down to C# and click to limit the results to a language I know a little about. Last Wee I did so, and got the humorous result:
Sorry, no entries were found matching tags C#, C#
I posted about it in the Lounge, we all got a good laugh about it, and moved on. But this morning I get the same message, so it apparently is not the momentary glitch I thought it was.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a load issue. We're working on redoing our caching level in the next couple of weeks to tackle this issue
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I also get the notification box on this forum.
It was working this morning, and I haven't changed email address or anything which should be causing CP to say I need to reverify.
|
|
|
|
|
Periodically you need to confirm that the account is active against an email account. I guess you are now due for this confirmation.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to reverify. The message should have a link to the send confirmation email[^] page that sends an email with a link. Click the link and you're gold.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, just seemed weird that I needed to do that when nothing's changed on my end, but if it's intentional then that's cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestingly, that author appears to have deleted all their articles.
|
|
|
|
|
That article has been removed. You're viewing an old version.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is just me:
I'm looking at Who's Who, ordered by reputation (& "All Types"). I noticed SAK's account [^] isn't there, it should be between Christian's & Sacha's. If I put "Sergey" in the search name, he still isn't on the first page. If I put his full name in the search box, there he is.
“Education is not the piling on of learning, information, data, facts, skills, or abilities - that's training or instruction - but is rather making visible what is hidden as a seed”
“One of the greatest problems of our time is that many are schooled but few are educated”
Sir Thomas More (1478 – 1535)
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed it has a tendency to leave a few people out, I suspect because their profile is busy being updated or is otherwise engaged but it could be something else. As a result I don't tend to look at the Who's who page if the site is busy.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
|
At present if you navigate to;
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/ - it obviously takes me to my membership profile
How about adding some more routes into the grand scheme of things such as;
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/articles
/tips
/messages
/comments
/questions
/answers
/reputation
/etc.
At the moment, if I do http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/articles[^] it still takes me to my profile.
It will help making links look a bit better etc. etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really want http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/reputation? I'm not sure the servers would be able to cope trying to figure that one out? 
|
|
|
|
|
Not particularly, I was in free flow typing mode, only really need the key items.
|
|
|
|
|
Got the draft through for the case study. I am surprised how well it has come out! I have sent back a couple of ammendments and basically authorised the release on the back of them.
For some amazing reason, you even get a mention
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on my own case study now. I potentially have two of them to do, and there's some other things I'm looking at for Intel. They are just so cool to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
I sometimes wish I had more hours in a day and didn't have my real job to be getting on with!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I never........ 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio 2012 and .NET 4.5 Expert Development Cookbook : A Review[^]
To me it is just pure advertising... The guys who validated the aricle should be banned from their home country forever !
 ok, maybe not but a reminder should be sent to them... Or, maybe, I am awfully wrong and such article make sense to the rest of the community....
Seulement, dans certains cas, n'est-ce pas, on n'entend guère que ce qu'on désire entendre et ce qui vous arrange le mieux... [^]
Joe never complained of anything but ever did his duty in his way of life, with a strong hand, a quiet tongue, and a gentle heart [^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
