Web Development

Re: the protocol 'net.pipe' is not supported-WCF

28-Nov-12 1:38

I can only suggest that you check if "Net.Pipe Listener Adapter" service is running in Services management console.

modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.

mallikharjuna22128-Nov-12 2:34

mallikharjuna221

28-Nov-12 2:34

Thanks Rechard,

I just started developing WCF Services,can we self host these service which are using named pipes binding?
Is this binding any way related to IIS version I have on the machine too(I have IIS 5.1 only)?
I read from Msdn saying(NamedPipe Activation require IIS 7.0).

so can't i use these bindings with IIS 5.1?

Regards,
Mallikharjun.

Re: the protocol 'net.pipe' is not supported-WCF

User 171649228-Nov-12 3:11

how to get data when using header('location:'.$url) ???

28-Nov-12 3:11

As far as I am aware, IIS5.1 is Windows XP and Windows XP does not support what you want to achieve. Your choice is to upgrade to an operating system that does support what you want to achieve.

modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.

aa_zz26-Nov-12 4:27

aa_zz

26-Nov-12 4:27

Hi all.
when I using header('location:'.$url) then it redirect to url another, cannot get message from this url. how to when to get data when use header('location:'.$url) ???
thanks

nothing

Re: how to get data when using header('location:'.$url) ???

Zamshed Farhan15-Jan-13 4:24

Zamshed Farhan

15-Jan-13 4:24

aa_zz. Please clear by your question, I can't understand it. Would you please elaborate it a little bit more Smile | :)

Web technologies

Junoli25-Nov-12 11:28

Junoli

25-Nov-12 11:28

Somebody can name TOP WEB technologies are using in USA? What gain fast positions on the WEB technology? What need to know at soon time?

Re: Web technologies

Jon Larborn29-Nov-12 10:21

29-Nov-12 10:21

I guess as the rest of the world HTML Smile | :)

What do you mean?

break-word CSS

Jon Larborn23-Nov-12 7:15

23-Nov-12 7:15

Hi,
I have struggled with word wrap for long file names in a table. I use a class where I now implemented everything I can think has something to do with word wrap. It works in chrome but neither in Firefox or IE. How to do this?

CSS

.wraptext
{
    word-wrap: break-word; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */
    max-width: 450px;
    mso-word-wrap: break-word;

    -ms-word-break: break-all;
    word-break: break-all;
    -ms-word-wrap: break-word;
    word-wrap: break-word; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */
    white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-3 */
    white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; /* Mozilla, since 1999 */
    white-space: -pre-wrap; /* Opera 4-6 */
    white-space: -o-pre-wrap; /* Opera 7 */
}

vbmike24-Nov-12 4:08

24-Nov-12 4:08

Not knowing what string you were using or what you expected to see, I just put some lorem ipsum within a table and changed the css class to:

CSS

.wraptext
{
    word-wrap: normal; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */
    width: 450px;
    mso-word-wrap: normal;
 
    -ms-word-break: normal;
    word-break: normal;
    -ms-word-wrap: normal;
    word-wrap: normal; /* Internet Explorer 5.5+ */

}

All major browsers made the table look the same for me after the changes. Notice I changed the values to "normal". This will make words break so they are readable and not between letters which looks weird to me. Leaving max-width in the class, browsers Opera and Safari did not care for and rendered the table at 100% regardless of max-width setting. If you need responsive design you will have to research the max-width thing. Removing the white space settings allowed for the text in the table cells to look better. Again, not knowing what exact result you were aiming at this is what I experimented with and found.

vbmike

Jon Larborn24-Nov-12 13:13

24-Nov-12 13:13

I always want a word to break when it exceeds the maximum width. The normal break did not work.

vbmike29-Nov-12 9:58

29-Nov-12 9:58

Give me an idea of the content you are trying to use and what you want it to look like.

vbmike

Jon Larborn29-Nov-12 10:04

29-Nov-12 10:04

any long word breaked in a table cell.

vbmike29-Nov-12 10:10

29-Nov-12 10:10

Just so I understand so I can experiment, you want the word within the cell to wrap when the word gets over 450 but the cell may be bigger?

vbmike

Jon Larborn29-Nov-12 10:14

29-Nov-12 10:14

I did som experiments my self. If you have an width on a table or cell in a table it wont word wrap. However, if you create a

paragraph in your cell it will wrap.
Strange behavior. especially when it works in chrome.

vbmike29-Nov-12 11:06

29-Nov-12 11:06

Well, I suppose that you will have to use paragraph tag for your text. I tried that with some text within a paragraph tag in a fixed width table and your css code above and it wraps the text at max-width specified when the table is wider regardless of browser for me. Opera, Safari, Chrome, Firefox and even IE9. I guess I am not much help, sorry. Maybe someone else can.

vbmike

User 171649229-Nov-12 12:00

29-Nov-12 12:00

Break word is understood by most, if not all, modern CSS3 enabled browsers. But to make it effective, use a div tag with or without an ID name, then reference that div or the div's ID with a width size, then when you use that break word to another element within the hierachy then it will do what you expect it to.

An example ... http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/word-wrap-force-text-to-wrap[^]

modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.

Jon Larborn29-Nov-12 19:33

29-Nov-12 19:33

That is not more efficient than any other solution.

The only conclusion that I can draw from this matter is that:
word-wrap: break-word; will break words when it enters its containers boundery.
However, for most browsers this do not work for a table cells boundary
The boundary is set either by "width: 100px;" or by "max-width:100px" (it does of course not matter if the width is set in a css class or in the html directly)

vbmike30-Nov-12 9:17

30-Nov-12 9:17

I neglected to ask poster but I don't think HTML5/CSS3 is being used. I find div's way more effective than table architecture. At least once I had the ah-ha moment. Wink | ;)

vbmike

User 171649230-Nov-12 9:37

30-Nov-12 9:37

They say that tables are "old hat". But I say, they still to this day serve a purpose. And CodeProject, the website you are using right now, is an example of their continued use.

But yes, you are right, div's are effective and most suitable for manipulation

From the OP's original posting, it appears he was targetting older browsers using -moz- or -ms- and so on

modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.

Jon Larborn29-Nov-12 10:17